Kudou Kousei, Okura Kazuki, Satoh Kasumi
Department of Nursing, Akita University Hospital, Akita, JPN.
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Akita University Hospital, Akita, JPN.
Cureus. 2024 Nov 12;16(11):e73513. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73513. eCollection 2024 Nov.
Introduction Delirium in the intensive care unit (ICU) significantly impacts patient outcomes. While family involvement may help prevent delirium in ICU patients, its effect during mechanical ventilation remains unclear. This study investigated the association between verbal communication during family visits and early post-extubation delirium in mechanically ventilated ICU patients. Materials and methods This retrospective, analytical observational study used data from the hospital's standard electronic health record (EHR) system, which includes routine medical and nursing documentation. We conducted this study in a 10-bed emergency ICU at an academic hospital in rural Japan from April 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020. We included patients aged ≥18 years who received invasive positive pressure ventilation for >48 hours. We excluded patients who were discharged while intubated, required a tracheostomy, or were unable to be assessed using the intensive care delirium screening checklist (ICDSC). The primary outcome was the maximum ICDSC score within 24 hours post-extubation. We conducted multiple regression analyses with ICDSC as the outcome. Results A total of 110 patients were analyzed. The mean age was 64.7 years (standard deviation ± 14.3), and 73 patients were male (66.4%). The median duration of intubation was five days (interquartile range (IQR), 4-8), and the median sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score was 8 (IQR, 6-11). The median ICDSC within 24 hours post-extubation was 3 (IQR, 2-5). Of the total 110 patients, 28 (25.5%) could communicate verbally. Patients who could communicate verbally had lower SOFA scores, longer duration of intubation, more frequent family visits, and higher intensive care mobility scale (IMS) scores during intubation. Neither single nor multiple regression showed a significant association between verbal communication and post-extubation ICDSC. Conclusions We did not find a statistically significant association between verbal communication during family visits with patients and ICDSC within 24 hours post-extubation. Potential confounders and variations in care practices may have influenced the results. Further studies are needed to address these limitations.
引言 重症监护病房(ICU)中的谵妄会对患者的预后产生重大影响。虽然家属参与可能有助于预防ICU患者发生谵妄,但其在机械通气期间的作用仍不明确。本研究调查了家属探视期间的言语交流与机械通气的ICU患者拔管后早期谵妄之间的关联。
材料与方法 这项回顾性分析观察性研究使用了医院标准电子健康记录(EHR)系统中的数据,该系统包括常规医疗和护理记录。我们于2019年4月1日至2020年12月31日在日本农村地区一家学术医院的一间拥有10张床位的急诊ICU中开展了本研究。我们纳入了年龄≥18岁且接受有创正压通气超过48小时的患者。我们排除了插管期间出院、需要气管切开术或无法使用重症监护谵妄筛查检查表(ICDSC)进行评估的患者。主要结局是拔管后24小时内的最高ICDSC评分。我们以ICDSC作为结局进行了多元回归分析。
结果 共分析了110例患者。平均年龄为64.7岁(标准差±14.3),73例患者为男性(66.4%)。插管的中位持续时间为5天(四分位间距(IQR),4 - 8),序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分的中位数为8(IQR,6 - 11)。拔管后24小时内ICDSC的中位数为3(IQR,2 - 5)。在总共110例患者中,28例(25.5%)能够进行言语交流。能够进行言语交流的患者SOFA评分较低、插管持续时间较长、家属探视更频繁且插管期间重症监护活动量表(IMS)评分较高。单因素和多因素回归均未显示言语交流与拔管后ICDSC之间存在显著关联。
结论 我们未发现患者家属探视期间的言语交流与拔管后24小时内的ICDSC之间存在统计学上的显著关联。潜在的混杂因素和护理实践的差异可能影响了结果。需要进一步的研究来解决这些局限性。