Neurocritical Care and Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Neurocrit Care. 2020 Dec;33(3):708-717. doi: 10.1007/s12028-020-00938-y.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Delirium is a common complication in critically ill patients with a negative impact on hospital length of stay, morbidity, and mortality. Little is known on how neurological deficits affect the outcome of commonly used delirium screening tools such as the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) and the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) in neurocritical care patients.
Over a period of 1 month, all patients admitted to a neurocritical care and stroke unit at a single academic center were prospectively screened for delirium using both CAM-ICU and ICDSC. Tool-based delirium screening was compared with delirium evaluation by the treating clinical team. Additionally, ICD-10 delirium criteria were assessed.
One hundred twenty-three patients with a total of 644 daily screenings were included. Twenty-three patients (18.7%) were diagnosed with delirium according to the clinical evaluation. Delirium incidence amounted to 23.6% (CAM-ICU) and 26.8% (ICDSC). Sensitivity and specificity of both screening tools were 66.9% and 93.3% for CAM-ICU and 69.9% and 93.9% for ICDSC, respectively. Patients identified with delirium by either CAM-ICU or ICDSC presented a higher proportion of neurological deficits such as impaired consciousness, expressive aphasia, impaired language comprehension, and hemineglect. Subsequently, generalized estimating equations identified a significant association between impaired consciousness (as indexed by Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale) and a positive delirium assessment with both CAM-ICU and ICDSC, while impaired language comprehension and hemineglect were only associated with a positive CAM-ICU result.
A positive delirium screening with both CAM-ICU and ICDSC in neurocritical care and stroke unit patients was found to be significantly associated with the presence of neurological deficits. These findings underline the need for a more specific delirium screening tool in neurocritical care patients.
背景/目的:谵妄是危重症患者的常见并发症,对住院时间、发病率和死亡率有负面影响。在神经危重症患者中,神经功能缺损如何影响常用谵妄筛查工具(如重症监护谵妄评估方法(CAM-ICU)和重症监护谵妄筛查检查表(ICDSC))的结果知之甚少。
在一个月的时间内,对一家学术中心的神经重症监护病房和卒中病房的所有患者进行前瞻性筛查,使用 CAM-ICU 和 ICDSC 进行谵妄筛查。基于工具的谵妄筛查与治疗临床团队的谵妄评估进行比较。此外,还评估了 ICD-10 谵妄标准。
共纳入 123 例患者,共进行了 644 次每日筛查。根据临床评估,23 例(18.7%)患者被诊断为谵妄。谵妄发生率为 23.6%(CAM-ICU)和 26.8%(ICDSC)。CAM-ICU 和 ICDSC 的敏感性和特异性分别为 66.9%和 93.3%和 69.9%和 93.9%。通过 CAM-ICU 或 ICDSC 识别为谵妄的患者表现出更高比例的神经功能缺损,如意识障碍、表达性失语、语言理解受损和偏侧忽略。随后,广义估计方程确定了意识障碍(如 Richmond 躁动和镇静量表所测)与 CAM-ICU 和 ICDSC 均为阳性的谵妄评估之间存在显著关联,而语言理解受损和偏侧忽略仅与 CAM-ICU 结果阳性相关。
在神经重症监护病房和卒中病房患者中,CAM-ICU 和 ICDSC 的阳性谵妄筛查与神经功能缺损的存在显著相关。这些发现强调了在神经危重症患者中需要更特异的谵妄筛查工具。