• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对基层医疗中军事人员数字健康治疗负担体验的系统评价。

A systematic review of the experience of treatment burden of digital health for military personnel in primary healthcare.

作者信息

Erhahiemen Paul, O'Donnell Catherine A, Gallacher Katie, Nicholl Barbara I

机构信息

General Practice & Primary Care, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, G12 8TB, UK.

出版信息

Health Open Res. 2024 Mar 8;6:9. doi: 10.12688/healthopenres.13599.1. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.12688/healthopenres.13599.1
PMID:39678097
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11638906/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital Health (DH) integrates digital technologies into healthcare to increase efficiency and improve patient experiences, benefiting both primary care and military healthcare systems. However, it raises concerns about the potential shift of healthcare responsibilities onto patients, creating workloads or treatment burdens that affect care, adherence, equity, and resource allocation. It is critical to assess this in the military context to enhance patient-centred care and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To understand military personnel's experience of treatment burden of DH in primary care, to understand the barriers and facilitators of the use of DH, and to map barriers identified to the Burden of Treatment Theory (BOTT).

DESIGN

A systematic literature review. MEDLINE, Psych INFO, EMBASE, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Google Scholar will be searched. Two independent reviewers will screen papers using inclusion and exclusion criteria, with conflicts decided by a third reviewer. Any retrieved study that meets the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be quality appraised using the appropriate Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist. The findings will be analysed using thematic synthesis and evaluated in the context of the Burden of Treatment Theory. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol (PRISMA) guidelines have been adhered to in the production of this protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the experience of treatment burden whilst using DH in the military has the potential to influence health policy, the commissioning of services and interventions, and most importantly, improve patient experience and health outcomes. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023494297.

摘要

背景

数字健康(DH)将数字技术融入医疗保健,以提高效率并改善患者体验,这对初级保健和军事医疗系统都有益处。然而,它引发了人们对医疗保健责任可能向患者转移的担忧,从而产生影响医疗、依从性、公平性和资源分配的工作量或治疗负担。在军事背景下评估这一点对于加强以患者为中心的护理和改善治疗结果至关重要。

目的

了解军事人员在初级保健中对数字健康治疗负担的体验,了解数字健康使用的障碍和促进因素,并将识别出的障碍映射到治疗负担理论(BOTT)。

设计

系统文献综述。将检索MEDLINE、心理信息数据库、EMBASE、护理及相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)和谷歌学术。两名独立评审员将使用纳入和排除标准筛选论文,如有冲突由第三名评审员决定。任何符合纳入和排除标准的检索到的研究将使用适当的批判性评估技能计划(CASP)清单进行质量评估。研究结果将采用主题综合法进行分析,并在治疗负担理论的背景下进行评估。本方案的制定遵循了系统评价和Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。

结论

了解在军事环境中使用数字健康时的治疗负担体验有可能影响卫生政策、服务和干预措施的委托,最重要的是,改善患者体验和健康结果。PROSPERO注册号:CRD42023494297。

相似文献

1
A systematic review of the experience of treatment burden of digital health for military personnel in primary healthcare.对基层医疗中军事人员数字健康治疗负担体验的系统评价。
Health Open Res. 2024 Mar 8;6:9. doi: 10.12688/healthopenres.13599.1. eCollection 2024.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Digital Education for the Management of Chronic Wounds in Health Care Professionals: Protocol for a Systematic Review by the Digital Health Education Collaboration.医疗保健专业人员慢性伤口管理的数字教育:数字健康教育合作组织的系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Mar 25;8(3):e12488. doi: 10.2196/12488.
5
Virtual Trauma-Focused Therapy for Military Members, Veterans, and Public Safety Personnel With Posttraumatic Stress Injury: Systematic Scoping Review.虚拟现实创伤聚焦疗法治疗创伤后应激障碍的军人、退伍军人和公共安全人员:系统范围综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Sep 21;8(9):e22079. doi: 10.2196/22079.
6
Adherence to tuberculosis (TB) treatment in high compared to low TB burden countries: study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis with a qualitative meta-synthesis of themes.与低结核病负担国家相比,高结核病负担国家的结核病治疗依从性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析的研究方案以及主题的定性元综合分析
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 25;15(1):e089507. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089507.
7
Strategies used for childhood chronic functional constipation: the SUCCESS evidence synthesis.用于儿童慢性功能性便秘的策略:SUCCESS 证据综合。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jan;28(5):1-266. doi: 10.3310/PLTR9622.
8
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
9
Impact of interventions to improve recovery of older adults following planned hospital admission on quality-of-life following discharge: linked-evidence synthesis.干预措施对改善计划住院的老年患者出院后生活质量的影响:综合证据分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Nov;11(23):1-164. doi: 10.3310/GHTY5117.
10
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of a Novel Patient-Reported Measure of The Burden of Digital Care in Diabetes.一种新型糖尿病患者报告的数字护理负担测量方法的验证
Res Sq. 2025 Aug 20:rs.3.rs-7265768. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7265768/v1.

本文引用的文献

1
Personalised digital technology for mental health in the armed forces: the potential, the hype and the dangers.军队心理健康的个性化数字技术:潜力、炒作和危险。
BMJ Mil Health. 2023 Feb;169(1):406-408. doi: 10.1136/military-2022-002279. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
2
The Promise of Digital Health: Then, Now, and the Future.数字健康的前景:过去、现在与未来。
NAM Perspect. 2022 Jun 27;2022. doi: 10.31478/202206e. eCollection 2022.
3
Discussing treatment burden.讨论治疗负担。
Breathe (Sheff). 2021 Mar;17(1):200284. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0284-2020.
4
Treatment burden for patients with multimorbidity: cross-sectional study with exploration of a single-item measure.多病共存患者的治疗负担:一项探索单一指标测量方法的横断面研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Apr 29;71(706):e381-e390. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2020.0883. Print 2021 May.
5
Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Research: A Scoping Review.人工智能与基层医疗研究:范围综述。
Ann Fam Med. 2020 May;18(3):250-258. doi: 10.1370/afm.2518.
6
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.系统评价和荟萃分析议定书的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015:详细说明和解释。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 2;350:g7647. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7647.
7
Rethinking the patient: using Burden of Treatment Theory to understand the changing dynamics of illness.重新审视患者:运用治疗负担理论理解疾病动态的变化
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jun 26;14:281. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-281.
8
Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review.测试系统混合研究综述的试点混合方法评估工具(MMAT)的可靠性和效率。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Jan;49(1):47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.07.002. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
9
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration.用于报告评估医疗保健干预措施的系统评价和荟萃分析的PRISMA声明:解释与详述
BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2700. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2700.
10
Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews.系统评价中定性研究的主题综合方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Jul 10;8:45. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45.