Luo Yang, Zhang Junshuai, Jia Haichang, Mu Xintong, Huang Jing
College of Physical Education, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 29;12:1487789. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1487789. eCollection 2024.
High-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) have demonstrated significant potential for enhancing physical and mental health. However, their respective effects on enjoyment and affective responses remain contentious.
The objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of HIIT and MICT on enjoyment and affective responses in overweight or obese people, and to find the most appropriate exercise mode for overweight or obese people.
This study was conducted following PRISMA guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. A comprehensive search was performed across databases including Cochrane, EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science, with a cutoff date of August 2024. Data extraction and organization were carried out using Excel, and Review manager was used to evaluate the quality of the literature and to analyze and process the data. The Stata was used to test publication bias.
A total of 16 articles were included in the literature, and a total of 537 participants met the inclusion criteria, including 213 participants in HIIT, 183 participants in MICT, 84 participants in alternating HIIT and MICT, and 57 participants in other forms of intervention (self-selected intensity exercise, very-high-intensity interval exercise, repetitive sprint training, and blank control). All study participants were between the ages of 18-70 years old, and the duration of the intervention ranged from 1 to 16 weeks. Enjoyment and affective effects of HIIT and MICT were analyzed using the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale, Feeling Scale and Felt Arousal Scale.
Both HIIT and MICT can bring about similar enjoyable and positive affective responses in overweight and obese people, HIIT caused participants to experience higher enjoyment and similar affect responses compared to MICT.
高强度间歇训练（HIIT）和中等强度持续训练（MICT）已显示出对增强身心健康具有显著潜力。然而，它们对愉悦感和情感反应的各自影响仍存在争议。
本荟萃分析的目的是评估和比较HIIT和MICT对超重或肥胖人群愉悦感和情感反应的有效性，并为超重或肥胖人群找到最合适的运动模式。
本研究按照PRISMA指南和《Cochrane干预措施系统评价手册》进行。对包括Cochrane、EMBASE、PubMed和Web of Science在内的数据库进行了全面检索，截止日期为2024年8月。使用Excel进行数据提取和整理，并使用Review manager评估文献质量以及分析和处理数据。使用Stata检验发表偏倚。
文献共纳入16篇文章，共有537名参与者符合纳入标准，其中HIIT组213名参与者，MICT组183名参与者，HIIT与MICT交替组84名参与者，其他形式干预组（自选强度运动、极高强度间歇运动、重复冲刺训练和空白对照）57名参与者。所有研究参与者年龄在18 - 70岁之间，干预持续时间为1至16周。使用身体活动愉悦量表、情感量表和唤醒感量表分析HIIT和MICT的愉悦感和情感效应。
HIIT和MICT均可在超重和肥胖人群中带来相似的愉悦和积极情感反应，与MICT相比，HIIT使参与者体验到更高的愉悦感和相似的情感反应。
