Suppr超能文献

从经腹腔腹腔镜肾上腺切除术过渡到后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的益处——单中心经验

Benefits of transitioning from transperitoneal laparoscopic to retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy-a single center experience.

作者信息

Feka Joy, Soliman Barbara, Arikan Melisa, Binter Teresa, Hargitai Lindsay, Scheuba Christian, Riss Philipp

机构信息

Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Gland Surg. 2024 Nov 30;13(11):1977-1985. doi: 10.21037/gs-24-286. Epub 2024 Nov 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since 2017, switching from laparoscopic transabdominal adrenalectomy (LTA), posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (RPA) is used as standard procedure in this institution. Aim of this retrospective study was to compare both techniques regarding operative time, length of stay and safety of the procedures.

METHODS

All patients operated in our institution for adrenal tumors were prospectively documented in the EUROCRINE-database and retrospectively analyzed. Sex, age, body mass index (BMI), indication, operative time, conversion and complication rates, hospital stay and tumor-size were analyzed by Z-score, chi-square test, -test, Mann-Whitney test and Pearson correlation.

RESULTS

A total of 105 RPAs and 132 LTAs were performed in an 8-year period. No difference was seen in age, sex and tumor localization. Adenoma (n=113) and pheochromocytoma (n=64) were the most common histopathological findings. Compared to the LTA group, the RPA group had significantly shorter operative time with a median of 50 (15-380) 125 (25-420) min (P<0.001) and shorter hospital stay with a median of 3 9 days (P<0.001). The decrease of the median operative time in RPA group, visualizing the learning curve of the procedure, was from 60 min (2017) to 45 min (2020). Four conversions from RPA to open adrenalectomy had to be performed due to bleeding or adhesions, whereas 9 LTA procedures had to be converted due to bleeding (n=2), unclear anatomy (n=1), adhesions (n=1), difficult access (n=1) or planned conversion (n=4).

CONCLUSIONS

RPA could be safely introduced with reduced operative times and shorter length of hospital stay compared to LTA.

摘要

背景

自2017年起,本机构将腹腔镜经腹肾上腺切除术(LTA)改为后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术(RPA)作为标准术式。本回顾性研究的目的是比较这两种技术在手术时间、住院时间和手术安全性方面的差异。

方法

对在本机构接受肾上腺肿瘤手术的所有患者进行前瞻性记录,并录入EUROCRINE数据库进行回顾性分析。通过Z分数、卡方检验、t检验、曼-惠特尼检验和皮尔逊相关性分析患者的性别、年龄、体重指数(BMI)、手术指征、手术时间、中转率和并发症发生率、住院时间及肿瘤大小。

结果

在8年时间里,共进行了105例RPA手术和132例LTA手术。患者的年龄、性别和肿瘤位置无差异。最常见的组织病理学结果为腺瘤(n=113)和嗜铬细胞瘤(n=64)。与LTA组相比,RPA组的手术时间显著缩短,中位数为50(15-380)分钟对125(25-420)分钟(P<0.001),住院时间也更短,中位数为3天对9天(P<0.001)。RPA组手术时间中位数的下降体现了该手术的学习曲线,从2017年的60分钟降至2020年的45分钟。由于出血或粘连,4例RPA手术不得不中转至开放肾上腺切除术,而9例LTA手术因出血(n=2)、解剖结构不清(n=1)、粘连(n=1)、入路困难(n=1)或计划中转(n=4)而中转。

结论

与LTA相比,RPA手术时间缩短,住院时间更短,可安全开展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2a8/11635560/efb793c08a7d/gs-13-11-1977-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验