Chen Weihai, Wang Linquan, Zheng Ju, Wu Yanming, You Hua, Qiao Zhenguo
Department of Cardiology, Suzhou Ninth People's Hospital, Suzhou Ninth Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University Suzhou 215200, Jiangsu, China.
Department of Gastroenterology, Suzhou Ninth People's Hospital, Suzhou Ninth Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University Suzhou 215200, Jiangsu, China.
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Nov 15;16(11):7176-7185. doi: 10.62347/OIUI2017. eCollection 2024.
The randomized controlled study explored whether physiological ischemia training (PIT) can inhibit ventricular remodeling and reduce ventricular arrhythmias in the early period of acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
AMI patients with hypotension or bradycardia were randomly divided into PIT (n = 21) and control (n = 20) groups. Meanwhile, patients with normal blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were randomly divided into PIT+angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and/or β-blocker (AB) (n = 30) and AB (n = 30) groups. PIT was performed in the PIT and PIT+AB groups. Finally, indicators of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) activity, ventricular remodeling, cardiac function, vascular neovascularization, and ventricular arrhythmias were compared among the groups after 3 months of intervention.
Indicators of RAAS activity, ventricular remodeling, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and QT dispersion (QTd) were improved in the PIT, PIT+AB and AB groups after 3 months of intervention (P < 0.05). Improvements in the indicators of RAAS activity, ventricular remodeling, LVEF and QTd in the PIT+AB group were superior to those in the AB group by the end of training (P < 0.05). The levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and nitric oxide (NO) in circulating blood were higher significantly in the PIT and PIT+AB groups after 3 months of intervention (P < 0.05). The Lown classification in the PIT+AB group decreased more than in other groups, and there was a significant difference compared with the control group (P < 0.05). Diastolic BP increased to some extent during PIT, whereas systolic BP or HR showed no significant effects.
These findings suggest that PIT can effectively inhibit early ventricular remodeling, thereby reducing the risk of ventricular arrhythmias after myocardial infarction, and patients can further benefit from a combination of PIT and ACEIs/angiotensin receptor blockers and beta-blockers.
本随机对照研究探讨生理性缺血训练(PIT)是否能在急性心肌梗死(AMI)早期抑制心室重构并减少室性心律失常。
将伴有低血压或心动过缓的AMI患者随机分为PIT组(n = 21)和对照组(n = 20)。同时,将血压(BP)和心率(HR)正常的患者随机分为PIT+血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)和/或β受体阻滞剂(AB)组(n = 30)和AB组(n = 30)。PIT组和PIT+AB组进行生理性缺血训练。最后,在干预3个月后比较各组肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统(RAAS)活性、心室重构、心功能、血管新生血管化和室性心律失常的指标。
干预3个月后,PIT组、PIT+AB组和AB组的RAAS活性、心室重构、左心室射血分数(LVEF)和QT离散度(QTd)指标均得到改善(P < 0.05)。训练结束时,PIT+AB组RAAS活性、心室重构、LVEF和QTd指标的改善优于AB组(P < 0.05)。干预3个月后,PIT组和PIT+AB组循环血中血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)和一氧化氮(NO)水平显著升高(P < 0.05)。PIT+AB组的Lown分级下降幅度大于其他组,与对照组相比有显著差异(P < 0.05)。生理性缺血训练期间舒张压有一定程度升高,而收缩压或心率无显著影响。
这些研究结果表明,生理性缺血训练可有效抑制早期心室重构,从而降低心肌梗死后室性心律失常的风险,患者联合使用ACEI/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂和β受体阻滞剂可进一步获益。