• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过专用路径和问卷在经导管主动脉瓣植入术前实施和评估共同决策。

Implementing and evaluating shared decision-making before transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a dedicated pathway and questionnaire.

作者信息

Carulli Ermes, Browne Suzy, Woolley Sara, Tindale Alexander, Pottle Alison, Nagle Kate, Lane Rebecca, Chandra Navin, Patel Niket, De Palma Rodney, Barnes Gareth, Kabir Tito, Panoulas Vasileios, Smith David, Smith Robert, Clernon Sharon, Heng Ee Ling, Akhtar Mohammed, Bowers Mark, McGovern Ian, Lüscher Thomas, Dalby Miles

机构信息

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Harefield Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Hill End Rd, Harefield, Uxbridge UB9 6JH, UK.

Doctoral School in Translational Medicine, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Open. 2024 Nov 4;4(6):oeae095. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeae095. eCollection 2024 Nov.

DOI:10.1093/ehjopen/oeae095
PMID:39678759
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11643346/
Abstract

AIMS

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement for patients with aortic valve stenosis. The choice between TAVI, surgery, or a conservative approach should be based upon multiple factors including clinical considerations, technical feasibility, and informed patient preference. In this context, engaging patients in a shared decision-making (SDM) process becomes essential, but this practice is generally underused.

METHODS AND RESULTS

To comply with the European and UK national guidelines, in January 2023 we established a structured SDM pathway in which patients are offered virtual/physical decision aids and after 1 week are invited to a meeting to reach a shared decision. From December 2022 to June 2023, a custom-developed questionnaire was prospectively administered to 23 patients prior to, and 38 patients after, the implementation of the SDM pathway. The answers to 12 core questions were recorded on a Likert scale (1-5). Global satisfaction, as measured by mean Likert score, was significantly higher for the post-SDM group than for the pre-SDM group (4.46 ± 0.14 vs. 3.78 ± 0.30, < 0.001). The percentage of positive (Likert 4-5) responses was significantly higher in the post-SDM group (289/312, 92.6% vs. 155/234, 66.2%, < 0.001). The percentage of negative (Likert 1-2) responses was significantly lower in the post-SDM group (5/312, 1.6% vs. 53/234, 22.6%, < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The SDM pathway proved effective in delivering SDM in compliance with national and international guidance. A similar approach leveraging digital technology to minimize cost and enhance patient convenience could be implemented for other treatments and across other institutions.

摘要

目的

经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)是主动脉瓣狭窄患者外科主动脉瓣置换术的替代方案。TAVI、手术或保守治疗方法的选择应基于多种因素,包括临床考量、技术可行性以及患者的明智偏好。在此背景下,让患者参与共同决策(SDM)过程变得至关重要,但这种做法普遍未得到充分利用。

方法与结果

为遵循欧洲和英国国家指南,2023年1月我们建立了一个结构化的SDM路径,为患者提供虚拟/实体决策辅助工具,并在1周后邀请他们参加会议以达成共同决策。从2022年12月到2023年6月,在SDM路径实施前对23名患者、实施后对38名患者前瞻性地发放了一份定制问卷。12个核心问题的答案采用李克特量表(1 - 5)记录。通过平均李克特评分衡量的总体满意度,SDM后组显著高于SDM前组(4.46±0.14对3.78±0.30,<0.001)。SDM后组积极(李克特4 - 5)回答的百分比显著更高(289/312,92.6%对155/234,66.2%,<0.001)。SDM后组消极(李克特1 - 2)回答的百分比显著更低(5/312,1.6%对53/234,22.6%,<0.001)。

结论

SDM路径被证明在按照国家和国际指南提供SDM方面是有效的。一种利用数字技术以最小化成本并提高患者便利性的类似方法可用于其他治疗并在其他机构实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f797/11643346/c67fe69feb87/oeae095f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f797/11643346/953852d9d73d/oeae095_ga.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f797/11643346/a7c62f3c0f3f/oeae095f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f797/11643346/1ede8f3c9061/oeae095f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f797/11643346/5affb554d08c/oeae095f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f797/11643346/c67fe69feb87/oeae095f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f797/11643346/953852d9d73d/oeae095_ga.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f797/11643346/a7c62f3c0f3f/oeae095f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f797/11643346/1ede8f3c9061/oeae095f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f797/11643346/5affb554d08c/oeae095f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f797/11643346/c67fe69feb87/oeae095f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementing and evaluating shared decision-making before transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a dedicated pathway and questionnaire.通过专用路径和问卷在经导管主动脉瓣植入术前实施和评估共同决策。
Eur Heart J Open. 2024 Nov 4;4(6):oeae095. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeae095. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
The IMproving treatment decisions for Patients with AortiC stenosis Through Shared Decision Making (IMPACT SDM) Study: study protocol for a cluster randomized stepped wedge trial.通过共享决策改善主动脉瓣狭窄患者治疗决策(IMPACT SDM)研究:一项整群随机阶梯楔形试验的研究方案
Trials. 2024 Dec 18;25(1):820. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08640-6.
3
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的疗效比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 6;11(12):e054222. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054222.
4
The Learning Curve for Shared Decision-making in Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis.症状性主动脉瓣狭窄的共享决策学习曲线。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Apr 1;5(4):442-448. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.5719.
5
Impact of Decision Aid on Decision-making of Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: Randomized Pilot Study.决策辅助工具对重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者决策的影响:随机试点研究
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Apr 11;1(2):100025. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100025. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr.
6
Professionals' views on shared decision-making in severe aortic stenosis.专业人士对重度主动脉瓣狭窄共同决策的看法。
Heart. 2022 Apr;108(7):558-564. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2021-320194. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
7
A Case Study on Reviewing Specialist Services Commissioning in Wales: TAVI for Severe Aortic Stenosis.威尔士专科服务采购案例研究:经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2022 Jul;20(4):487-499. doi: 10.1007/s40258-021-00692-y. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
8
Shared decision making in older patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review.老年有症状性重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的共同决策:系统评价。
Heart. 2020 May;106(9):647-655. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-316055. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
9
Minimalistic Approach for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI): Open Vascular Vs. Fully Percutaneous Approach.经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)的极简方法:开放血管法与完全经皮法
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2019 Oct 1;40(2):5-14. doi: 10.2478/prilozi-2019-0009.
10
Postoperative delirium and quality of life after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement: A prospective observational study.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术后谵妄与生活质量:一项前瞻性观察研究。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Jul;166(1):156-166.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.11.023. Epub 2021 Nov 17.

本文引用的文献

1
2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes.2024年欧洲心脏病学会慢性冠状动脉综合征管理指南
Eur Heart J. 2024 Sep 29;45(36):3415-3537. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae177.
2
Shared Decision-Making and Cardiovascular Health: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.共同决策与心血管健康:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circulation. 2023 Sep 12;148(11):912-931. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001162. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
3
Transcatheter aortic valve durability: a contemporary clinical review.经导管主动脉瓣耐久性:当代临床综述
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 May 9;10:1195397. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1195397. eCollection 2023.
4
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Long-Term Outcomes and Durability.经导管主动脉瓣植入术:长期结果和耐久性。
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2023 May 16;19(3):15-25. doi: 10.14797/mdcvj.1201. eCollection 2023.
5
2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease: Developed by the Task Force for the management of valvular heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS).2021年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心脏瓣膜病管理指南:由欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)心脏瓣膜病管理特别工作组和欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)制定。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2022 Jun;75(6):524. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2022.05.006.
6
Producing personalized statin treatment plans to optimize clinical outcomes using big data and machine learning.利用大数据和机器学习制定个性化他汀类药物治疗方案,以优化临床结果。
J Biomed Inform. 2022 Apr;128:104029. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104029. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
7
2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: Developed by the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). With the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.2021 ESC 急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断和治疗指南:由欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断和治疗工作组制定。特别感谢欧洲心脏病学会心力衰竭协会(HFA)的贡献。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2022 Jan;24(1):4-131. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2333.
8
Shared decision making and patient reported outcomes among adults with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, medical expenditure panel survey 2006-2015.2006 - 2015年医疗支出小组调查中,动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病成年患者的共同决策与患者报告结局
Am J Prev Cardiol. 2021 Nov 10;8:100281. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2021.100281. eCollection 2021 Dec.
9
"What Is the Right Decision for Me?" Integrating Patient Perspectives Through Shared Decision-Making for Valvular Heart Disease Therapy.“什么是对我正确的决定?” 通过共同决策为心脏瓣膜病治疗整合患者观点。
Can J Cardiol. 2021 Jul;37(7):1054-1063. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2021.02.022. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
10
New-onset left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement is associated with adverse long-term clinical outcomes in intermediate-risk patients: an analysis from the PARTNER II trial.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后新发左束支传导阻滞与中危患者不良长期临床结局相关:来自 PARTNER II 试验的分析。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jul 14;40(27):2218-2227. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz227.