Canonical coupled cluster binding benchmark for nanoscale noncovalent complexes at the hundred-atom scale.

In this study, we introduce two datasets for nanoscale noncovalent binding, featuring complexes at the hundred-atom scale, benchmarked using coupled cluster with single, double, and perturbative triple [CCSD(T)] excitations extrapolated to the complete basis set (CBS) limit. The first dataset, L14, comprises 14 complexes with canonical CCSD(T)/CBS benchmarks, extending the applicability of CCSD(T)/CBS binding benchmarks to systems as large as 113 atoms. The second dataset, vL11, consists of 11 even larger complexes, evaluated using the local CCSD(T)/CBS method with stringent thresholds, covering systems up to 174 atoms. We compare binding energies obtained from local CCSD(T) and fixed-node diffusion Monte Carlo (FN-DMC), which have previously shown discrepancies exceeding the chemical accuracy threshold of 1 kcal/mol in large complexes, with the new canonical CCSD(T)/CBS results. While local CCSD(T)/CBS agrees with canonical CCSD(T)/CBS within binding uncertainties, FN-DMC consistently underestimates binding energies in π-π complexes by over 1 kcal/mol. Potential sources of error in canonical CCSD(T)/CBS are discussed, and we argue that the observed discrepancies are unlikely to originate from CCSD(T) itself. Instead, the fixed-node approximation in FN-DMC warrants further investigation to elucidate these binding discrepancies. Using these datasets as reference, we evaluate the performance of various electronic structure methods, semi-empirical approaches, and machine learning potentials for nanoscale complexes. Based on computational accuracy and stability across system sizes, we recommend MP2+aiD(CCD), PBE0+D4, and ωB97X-3c as reliable methods for investigating noncovalent interactions in nanoscale complexes, maintaining their promising performance observed in smaller systems.