Evidence-based recommendations for the prophylactic use of antiseizure medications (ASMs) in neurosurgery: a systematic review of guidelines.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the methodological quality of guidelines concerning the prophylactic use of antiseizure medications (ASMs) in neurosurgery and to summarize relevant recommendations.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), Guidelines International Network (GIN), and other guideline repositories and official organizations were searched from 2004 to 2023 (20 years). The extracted information consisted of the guideline characteristics, relevant recommendations, levels of evidence, and strength of recommendations. Using the Guideline Research and Evaluation Tool II (AGREE II), five reviewers assessed the methodological quality of the guidelines, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) is used to assess the inter-reviewer consistency.

RESULTS

Of 27 eligible guidelines, AGREE II scores varied with higher scores in Clarity of Presentation (88.89%), Scope and Purpose (83.33%), and Editorial Independence (72.92%), but lower in Rigor of Development (59.17%), Stakeholder Involvement (46.67%), and Applicability (41.67%). ICC ranged from 0.51 to 0.92. Nine guidelines were recommended, eight with modifications, and ten not recommended. ASMs prophylaxis are recommended for patients with a seizure history, which means secondary prophylaxis, and specific high-risk groups, but not recommended for primary prophylaxis routinely for those without a history of seizure.

CONCLUSIONS

Guidelines in neurosurgical perioperative prophylactic use of ASMs are of moderate quality with domains for enhancement. Guidelines lack detailed guidance on medication initiation, dosage, and duration, highlighting the need for more high-quality clinical trials comparing newer and classical ASMs.