• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

调查老年人对用于药物决策的人工智能工具的看法:基于 vignette 的实验性调查。

Investigating Older Adults' Perceptions of AI Tools for Medication Decisions: Vignette-Based Experimental Survey.

作者信息

Vordenberg Sarah E, Nichols Julianna, Marshall Vincent D, Weir Kristie Rebecca, Dorsch Michael P

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 16;26:e60794. doi: 10.2196/60794.

DOI:10.2196/60794
PMID:39680885
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11686026/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Given the public release of large language models, research is needed to explore whether older adults would be receptive to personalized medication advice given by artificial intelligence (AI) tools.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to identify predictors of the likelihood of older adults stopping a medication and the influence of the source of the information.

METHODS

We conducted a web-based experimental survey in which US participants aged ≥65 years were asked to report their likelihood of stopping a medication based on the source of information using a 6-point Likert scale (scale anchors: 1=not at all likely; 6=extremely likely). In total, 3 medications were presented in a randomized order: aspirin (risk of bleeding), ranitidine (cancer-causing chemical), or simvastatin (lack of benefit with age). In total, 5 sources of information were presented: primary care provider (PCP), pharmacist, AI that connects with the electronic health record (EHR) and provides advice to the PCP ("EHR-PCP"), AI with EHR access that directly provides advice ("EHR-Direct"), and AI that asks questions to provide advice ("Questions-Direct") directly. We calculated descriptive statistics to identify participants who were extremely likely (score 6) to stop the medication and used logistic regression to identify demographic predictors of being likely (scores 4-6) as opposed to unlikely (scores 1-3) to stop a medication.

RESULTS

Older adults (n=1245) reported being extremely likely to stop a medication based on a PCP's recommendation (n=748, 60.1% [aspirin] to n=858, 68.9% [ranitidine]) compared to a pharmacist (n=227, 18.2% [simvastatin] to n=361, 29% [ranitidine]). They were infrequently extremely likely to stop a medication when recommended by AI (EHR-PCP: n=182, 14.6% [aspirin] to n=289, 23.2% [ranitidine]; EHR-Direct: n=118, 9.5% [simvastatin] to n=212, 17% [ranitidine]; Questions-Direct: n=121, 9.7% [aspirin] to n=204, 16.4% [ranitidine]). In adjusted analyses, characteristics that increased the likelihood of following an AI recommendation included being Black or African American as compared to White (Questions-Direct: odds ratio [OR] 1.28, 95% CI 1.06-1.54 to EHR-PCP: OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.17-1.73), having higher self-reported health (EHR-PCP: OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.18 to EHR-Direct: OR 1.13 95%, CI 1.05-1.23), having higher confidence in using an EHR (Questions-Direct: OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.16-1.58 to EHR-PCP: OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.33-1.80), and having higher confidence using apps (EHR-Direct: OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.18-1.62 to EHR-PCP: OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.27-1.74). Older adults with higher health literacy were less likely to stop a medication when recommended by AI (EHR-PCP: OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.75-0.88 to EHR-Direct: OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

Older adults have reservations about following an AI recommendation to stop a medication. However, individuals who are Black or African American, have higher self-reported health, or have higher confidence in using an EHR or apps may be receptive to AI-based medication recommendations.

摘要

背景

鉴于大语言模型已向公众发布,需要开展研究以探讨老年人是否会接受人工智能(AI)工具给出的个性化用药建议。

目的

本研究旨在确定老年人停药可能性的预测因素以及信息来源的影响。

方法

我们进行了一项基于网络的实验性调查,邀请年龄≥65岁的美国参与者使用6点李克特量表(量表锚点:1 = 完全不可能;6 = 极有可能),根据信息来源报告他们停药的可能性。总共以随机顺序呈现了3种药物:阿司匹林(出血风险)、雷尼替丁(致癌化学物质)或辛伐他汀(随年龄增长无益处)。总共呈现了5种信息来源:初级保健提供者(PCP)、药剂师、与电子健康记录(EHR)连接并向PCP提供建议的AI(“EHR - PCP”)、可访问EHR并直接提供建议的AI(“EHR - 直接”)以及通过提问提供建议的AI(“提问 - 直接”)。我们计算了描述性统计数据,以确定极有可能(得分为6)停药的参与者,并使用逻辑回归来确定与不太可能(得分为1 - 3)停药相比,可能(得分为4 - 6)停药的人口统计学预测因素。

结果

与药剂师相比(辛伐他汀:n = 227,18.2% [辛伐他汀] 至雷尼替丁:n = 361,29% [雷尼替丁]),老年人(n = 1245)报告称基于PCP的建议极有可能停药(阿司匹林:n = 748,60.1% [阿司匹林] 至雷尼替丁:n = 858,68.9% [雷尼替丁])。当由AI推荐时,他们很少极有可能停药(EHR - PCP:阿司匹林:n = 182,14.6% [阿司匹林] 至雷尼替丁:n = 289,23.2% [雷尼替丁];EHR - 直接:辛伐他汀:n = 118,9.5% [辛伐他汀] 至雷尼替丁:n = 212,17% [雷尼替丁];提问 - 直接:阿司匹林:n = 121,9.7% [阿司匹林] 至雷尼替丁:n = 204,16.4% [雷尼替丁])。在调整分析中,与白人相比,增加遵循AI建议可能性的特征包括为黑人或非裔美国人(提问 - 直接:优势比 [OR] 1.28,95% CI 1.06 - 1.54 至 EHR - PCP:OR 1.42,95% CI 1.17 - 1.73)、自我报告健康状况较高(EHR - PCP:OR 1.09,95% CI 1.01 - 1.18 至 EHR - 直接:OR 1.13 95%,CI 1.05 - 1.23)、对使用EHR有更高信心(提问 - 直接:OR 1.36,95% CI 1.16 -

相似文献

1
Investigating Older Adults' Perceptions of AI Tools for Medication Decisions: Vignette-Based Experimental Survey.调查老年人对用于药物决策的人工智能工具的看法:基于 vignette 的实验性调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 16;26:e60794. doi: 10.2196/60794.
2
Use of Electronic Health Record Access and Audit Logs to Identify Physician Actions Following Noninterruptive Alert Opening: Descriptive Study.利用电子健康记录访问和审计日志识别非中断性警报打开后医生的行为:描述性研究。
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Feb 7;7(1):e12650. doi: 10.2196/12650.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Effect of Uncertainty-Aware AI Models on Pharmacists' Reaction Time and Decision-Making in a Web-Based Mock Medication Verification Task: Randomized Controlled Trial.不确定性感知人工智能模型对药剂师在基于网络的模拟药物验证任务中的反应时间和决策的影响:随机对照试验
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Apr 18;13:e64902. doi: 10.2196/64902.
5
Deprescribing in the context of multiple providers: understanding patient preferences.多提供者环境下的减药:了解患者偏好。
Am J Manag Care. 2019 Apr;25(4):192-198.
6
Harm and Medication-Type Impact Agreement with Hypothetical Deprescribing Recommendations: a Vignette-Based Experiment with Older Adults Across Four Countries.与假设的减药建议相关的危害和药物类型影响协议:基于四个国家的老年人案例的实验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 May;38(6):1439-1448. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07850-5. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
7
Emergency physicians' knowledge and attitudes of clinical decision support in the electronic health record: a survey-based study.急诊医师对电子健康记录中临床决策支持的知识和态度:一项基于调查的研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;20(4):352-60. doi: 10.1111/acem.12109.
8
Patient and provider determinants of nephrology referral in older adults with severe chronic kidney disease: a survey of provider decision making.老年慢性肾脏病重度患者接受肾脏病转科治疗的患者和医疗服务提供者决定因素:对医疗服务提供者决策的调查。
BMC Nephrol. 2011 Sep 26;12:47. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-12-47.
9
Effects of warning information at medication initiation on deprescribing intentions in older adults: A hypothetical vignette.药物起始治疗时的警示信息对老年人减药意愿的影响:一项假设性 vignette 研究
Patient Educ Couns. 2025 Apr;133:108654. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2025.108654. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
10
Diverse patients' attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence (AI) in diagnosis.不同患者对人工智能在诊断中的态度。
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 May 19;2(5):e0000237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000237. eCollection 2023 May.

引用本文的文献

1
A Portal-Based Intervention (PATTERN) Designed to Support Medication Use Among Older Adults: Feasibility and Acceptability Study.一项旨在支持老年人用药的基于门户网站的干预措施(PATTERN):可行性和可接受性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Apr 24;9:e71676. doi: 10.2196/71676.
2
Enhancing the Clinical Relevance of Al Research for Medication Decision-Making.增强人工智能研究在药物决策中的临床相关性。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 18;27:e70657. doi: 10.2196/70657.
3
Authors' Reply: Enhancing the Clinical Relevance of Al Research for Medication Decision-Making.作者回复:提高人工智能研究在用药决策中的临床相关性。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 18;27:e72007. doi: 10.2196/72007.

本文引用的文献

1
Interest in Medication Deprescribing Among US Adults Aged 50-80.美国50至80岁成年人对减药的关注
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Oct;39(13):2631-2633. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08945-x. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
2
Aspirin Use Prevalence for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Among U.S. Adults From 2012 to 2021.2012年至2021年美国成年人中用于预防心血管疾病的阿司匹林使用 prevalence。 注:原文中“prevalence”直接翻译为“流行率”“患病率”等,在这里结合语境,似乎表述不太完整准确,推测可能是想表达“使用率”之类的意思,但按照要求不能添加解释说明,所以直接保留英文。
Ann Intern Med. 2024 Aug;177(8):1139-1141. doi: 10.7326/M24-0427. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
3
Proactive Polypharmacy Management Using Large Language Models: Opportunities to Enhance Geriatric Care.使用大型语言模型进行主动药物治疗管理:改善老年护理的机会。
J Med Syst. 2024 Apr 18;48(1):41. doi: 10.1007/s10916-024-02058-y.
4
Exploring Different Contexts of Statin Deprescribing: A Vignette-Based Experiment with Older Adults Across Four Countries.探索停用他汀类药物的不同情境:一项针对四个国家老年人的基于 vignette 的实验
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Jul;39(9):1773-1776. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08698-7. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
5
Artificial Intelligence and Decision-Making in Healthcare: A Thematic Analysis of a Systematic Review of Reviews.人工智能与医疗保健中的决策:对综述的系统评价的主题分析
Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2024 Mar 5;11:23333928241234863. doi: 10.1177/23333928241234863. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
6
Digital literacy as a new determinant of health: A scoping review.数字素养作为健康的新决定因素:一项范围综述。
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Oct 12;2(10):e0000279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000279. eCollection 2023 Oct.
7
Factors Important to Older Adults Who Disagree With a Deprescribing Recommendation.对不同意药物减量建议的老年人来说很重要的因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2337281. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.37281.
8
Patterns in Physician Burnout in a Stable-Linked Cohort.稳定关联队列中医生倦怠的模式。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2336745. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.36745.
9
Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice.人工智能在临床实践中的应用:医疗保健的革命。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Sep 22;23(1):689. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04698-z.
10
Utility of ChatGPT in Clinical Practice.ChatGPT 在临床实践中的应用。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 28;25:e48568. doi: 10.2196/48568.