Suppr超能文献

调查老年人对用于药物决策的人工智能工具的看法:基于 vignette 的实验性调查。

Investigating Older Adults' Perceptions of AI Tools for Medication Decisions: Vignette-Based Experimental Survey.

作者信息

Vordenberg Sarah E, Nichols Julianna, Marshall Vincent D, Weir Kristie Rebecca, Dorsch Michael P

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 16;26:e60794. doi: 10.2196/60794.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Given the public release of large language models, research is needed to explore whether older adults would be receptive to personalized medication advice given by artificial intelligence (AI) tools.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to identify predictors of the likelihood of older adults stopping a medication and the influence of the source of the information.

METHODS

We conducted a web-based experimental survey in which US participants aged ≥65 years were asked to report their likelihood of stopping a medication based on the source of information using a 6-point Likert scale (scale anchors: 1=not at all likely; 6=extremely likely). In total, 3 medications were presented in a randomized order: aspirin (risk of bleeding), ranitidine (cancer-causing chemical), or simvastatin (lack of benefit with age). In total, 5 sources of information were presented: primary care provider (PCP), pharmacist, AI that connects with the electronic health record (EHR) and provides advice to the PCP ("EHR-PCP"), AI with EHR access that directly provides advice ("EHR-Direct"), and AI that asks questions to provide advice ("Questions-Direct") directly. We calculated descriptive statistics to identify participants who were extremely likely (score 6) to stop the medication and used logistic regression to identify demographic predictors of being likely (scores 4-6) as opposed to unlikely (scores 1-3) to stop a medication.

RESULTS

Older adults (n=1245) reported being extremely likely to stop a medication based on a PCP's recommendation (n=748, 60.1% [aspirin] to n=858, 68.9% [ranitidine]) compared to a pharmacist (n=227, 18.2% [simvastatin] to n=361, 29% [ranitidine]). They were infrequently extremely likely to stop a medication when recommended by AI (EHR-PCP: n=182, 14.6% [aspirin] to n=289, 23.2% [ranitidine]; EHR-Direct: n=118, 9.5% [simvastatin] to n=212, 17% [ranitidine]; Questions-Direct: n=121, 9.7% [aspirin] to n=204, 16.4% [ranitidine]). In adjusted analyses, characteristics that increased the likelihood of following an AI recommendation included being Black or African American as compared to White (Questions-Direct: odds ratio [OR] 1.28, 95% CI 1.06-1.54 to EHR-PCP: OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.17-1.73), having higher self-reported health (EHR-PCP: OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.18 to EHR-Direct: OR 1.13 95%, CI 1.05-1.23), having higher confidence in using an EHR (Questions-Direct: OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.16-1.58 to EHR-PCP: OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.33-1.80), and having higher confidence using apps (EHR-Direct: OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.18-1.62 to EHR-PCP: OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.27-1.74). Older adults with higher health literacy were less likely to stop a medication when recommended by AI (EHR-PCP: OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.75-0.88 to EHR-Direct: OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

Older adults have reservations about following an AI recommendation to stop a medication. However, individuals who are Black or African American, have higher self-reported health, or have higher confidence in using an EHR or apps may be receptive to AI-based medication recommendations.

摘要

背景

鉴于大语言模型已向公众发布,需要开展研究以探讨老年人是否会接受人工智能(AI)工具给出的个性化用药建议。

目的

本研究旨在确定老年人停药可能性的预测因素以及信息来源的影响。

方法

我们进行了一项基于网络的实验性调查,邀请年龄≥65岁的美国参与者使用6点李克特量表(量表锚点:1 = 完全不可能;6 = 极有可能),根据信息来源报告他们停药的可能性。总共以随机顺序呈现了3种药物:阿司匹林(出血风险)、雷尼替丁(致癌化学物质)或辛伐他汀(随年龄增长无益处)。总共呈现了5种信息来源:初级保健提供者(PCP)、药剂师、与电子健康记录(EHR)连接并向PCP提供建议的AI(“EHR - PCP”)、可访问EHR并直接提供建议的AI(“EHR - 直接”)以及通过提问提供建议的AI(“提问 - 直接”)。我们计算了描述性统计数据,以确定极有可能(得分为6)停药的参与者,并使用逻辑回归来确定与不太可能(得分为1 - 3)停药相比,可能(得分为4 - 6)停药的人口统计学预测因素。

结果

与药剂师相比(辛伐他汀:n = 227,18.2% [辛伐他汀] 至雷尼替丁:n = 361,29% [雷尼替丁]),老年人(n = 1245)报告称基于PCP的建议极有可能停药(阿司匹林:n = 748,60.1% [阿司匹林] 至雷尼替丁:n = 858,68.9% [雷尼替丁])。当由AI推荐时,他们很少极有可能停药(EHR - PCP:阿司匹林:n = 182,14.6% [阿司匹林] 至雷尼替丁:n = 289,23.2% [雷尼替丁];EHR - 直接:辛伐他汀:n = 118,9.5% [辛伐他汀] 至雷尼替丁:n = 212,17% [雷尼替丁];提问 - 直接:阿司匹林:n = 121,9.7% [阿司匹林] 至雷尼替丁:n = 204,16.4% [雷尼替丁])。在调整分析中,与白人相比,增加遵循AI建议可能性的特征包括为黑人或非裔美国人(提问 - 直接:优势比 [OR] 1.28,95% CI 1.06 - 1.54 至 EHR - PCP:OR 1.42,95% CI 1.17 - 1.73)、自我报告健康状况较高(EHR - PCP:OR 1.09,95% CI 1.01 - 1.18 至 EHR - 直接:OR 1.13 95%,CI 1.05 - 1.23)、对使用EHR有更高信心(提问 - 直接:OR 1.36,95% CI 1.16 -

相似文献

10
Diverse patients' attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence (AI) in diagnosis.不同患者对人工智能在诊断中的态度。
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 May 19;2(5):e0000237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000237. eCollection 2023 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Interest in Medication Deprescribing Among US Adults Aged 50-80.美国50至80岁成年人对减药的关注
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Oct;39(13):2631-2633. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08945-x. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
6
Digital literacy as a new determinant of health: A scoping review.数字素养作为健康的新决定因素:一项范围综述。
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Oct 12;2(10):e0000279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000279. eCollection 2023 Oct.
8
Patterns in Physician Burnout in a Stable-Linked Cohort.稳定关联队列中医生倦怠的模式。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2336745. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.36745.
10
Utility of ChatGPT in Clinical Practice.ChatGPT 在临床实践中的应用。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 28;25:e48568. doi: 10.2196/48568.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验