Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2337281. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.37281.
Little is known about why older adults decline deprescribing recommendations, primarily because interventional studies rarely capture the reasons.
To examine factors important to older adults who disagree with a deprescribing recommendation given by a primary care physician to a hypothetical patient experiencing polypharmacy.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This online, vignette-based survey study was conducted from December 1, 2020, to March 31, 2021, with participants 65 years or older in the United Kingdom, the US, Australia, and the Netherlands. The primary outcome of the main study was disagreement with a deprescribing recommendation. A content analysis was subsequently conducted of the free-text reasons provided by participants who strongly disagreed or disagreed with deprescribing. Data were analyzed from August 22, 2022, to February 12, 2023.
Attitudes, beliefs, fears, and recommended actions of older adults in response to deprescribing recommendations.
Of the 899 participants included in the analysis, the mean (SD) age was 71.5 (4.9) years; 456 participants (50.7%) were men. Attitudes, beliefs, and fears reported by participants included doubts about deprescribing (361 [40.2%]), valuing medications (139 [15.5%]), and a preference to avoid change (132 [14.7%]). Valuing medications was reported more commonly among participants who strongly disagreed compared with those who disagreed with deprescribing (48 of 205 [23.4%] vs 91 of 694 [13.1%], respectively; P < .001) or had personal experience with the same medication class as the vignette compared with no experience (93 of 517 [18.0%] vs 46 of 318 [12.1%], respectively; P = .02). Participants shared that improved communication (225 [25.0%]), alternative strategies (138 [15.4%]), and consideration of medication preferences (137 [15.2%]) may increase their agreement with deprescribing. Participants who disagreed compared with those who strongly disagreed were more interested in additional communication (196 [28.2%] vs 29 [14.2%], respectively; P < .001), alternative strategies (117 [16.9%] vs 21 [10.2%], respectively; P = .02), or consideration of medication preferences (122 [17.6%] vs 15 [7.3%], respectively; P < .001).
In this survey study, older adults who disagreed with a deprescribing recommendation were more interested in additional communication, alternative strategies, or consideration of medication preferences compared with those who strongly disagreed. These findings suggest that identifying the degree of disagreement with deprescribing could be used to tailor patient-centered communication about deprescribing in older adults.
人们对老年人为何拒绝接受减药建议知之甚少,主要是因为干预性研究很少能捕捉到这些原因。
研究对主要照顾者不同意初级保健医生为一名正在接受多种药物治疗的假设患者开出的减药建议的原因。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项基于在线情景的调查研究,于 2020 年 12 月 1 日至 2021 年 3 月 31 日期间在美国、英国、澳大利亚和荷兰进行,参与者为 65 岁及以上的老年人。主要研究的主要结局是对减药建议存在分歧。随后对参与者提供的强烈不同意或不同意减药的自由文本理由进行了内容分析。数据分析于 2023 年 2 月 12 日进行。
老年人对减药建议的态度、信念、恐惧和建议的行动。
在 899 名纳入分析的参与者中,平均(SD)年龄为 71.5(4.9)岁;456 名参与者(50.7%)为男性。参与者报告的态度、信念和恐惧包括对减药的怀疑(361 名[40.2%])、重视药物(139 名[15.5%])和避免改变的偏好(132 名[14.7%])。与不同意减药的参与者相比,强烈不同意减药的参与者更有可能重视药物(48 名[23.4%]与 91 名[13.1%],分别;P<0.001)或与自己正在服用的药物类别有个人经验(93 名[18.0%]与 46 名[12.1%],分别;P=0.02)。参与者认为,改善沟通(225 名[25.0%])、替代策略(138 名[15.4%])和考虑药物偏好(137 名[15.2%])可能会增加他们对减药的同意。与强烈不同意减药的参与者相比,不同意减药的参与者对额外的沟通(196 名[28.2%]与 29 名[14.2%],分别;P<0.001)、替代策略(117 名[16.9%]与 21 名[10.2%],分别;P=0.02)或考虑药物偏好(122 名[17.6%]与 15 名[7.3%],分别;P<0.001)更感兴趣。
在这项调查研究中,与强烈不同意减药的参与者相比,不同意减药建议的老年人对额外的沟通、替代策略或考虑药物偏好更感兴趣。这些发现表明,确定对减药的不同程度的反对意见,可以用于调整针对老年人的以患者为中心的减药沟通。