Suppr超能文献

在机械通气和撤机试验期间,空气饥饿感远远超过呼吸困难和用力感觉。

Air Hunger Far Exceeds Dyspnea Sense of Effort during Mechanical Ventilation and a Weaning Trial.

作者信息

Jubran Amal, Laghi Franco, Grant Brydon J B, Tobin Martin J

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Hines Veterans Affairs Hospital, Hines, Illinois.

Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University of Chicago, Maywood, Illinois.

出版信息

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2025 Mar;211(3):323-330. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202406-1243OC.

Abstract

No systematic investigation into dyspnea in patients receiving prolonged ventilation (>21 d) after recovering from critical illness has been published. We sought to determine the magnitude, nature, and pathophysiological basis of dyspnea during an unassisted-breathing trial in patients receiving prolonged ventilation. Dyspnea intensity and descriptor selection were investigated in 27 patients receiving prolonged ventilation during a 60-minute unassisted-breathing trial. Pressure-time product, respiratory mechanics, and Ptc were also measured. Of 10 patients who reported dyspnea during assist-control ventilation, 9 (90.0%) selected "Not getting enough air" to characterize dyspnea. Vt setting was lower in dyspneic than in nondyspneic patients (480.0 vs. 559.4 ml),  < 0.046. During the unassisted-breathing trial ( = 26), patients developed increases in dyspnea ( < 0.01) and Ptc ( < 0.01) but no change in [Formula: see text]e. Dyspnea score was strongly linked to Ptc ( < 0.012) and airway resistance ( < 0.013) but not respiratory work (although pressure-time product was almost three times higher than normal). At 60 minutes into the trial, 83.3% of patients selected "Not getting enough air" on its own or in combination with "Too much effort" to describe discomfort, whereas only 16.7% selected "Too much effort" on its own ( < 0.001). Across the dyspnea spectrum, patients chose "Not getting enough air" overwhelmingly over other descriptor options ( < 0.001). Patients developed increases in dyspnea and Ptc but unchanged [Formula: see text]e and work of breathing during an unassisted-breathing trial; patients selected air-hunger descriptors overwhelmingly over excessive effort. The observations support the belief that air hunger results from heightened respiratory center stimulation combined with the incapacity to increase [Formula: see text]e.

摘要

目前尚未发表对危重症康复后接受长时间通气(>21天)患者的呼吸困难情况进行的系统研究。我们试图确定长时间通气患者在自主呼吸试验期间呼吸困难的程度、性质和病理生理基础。在27例接受长时间通气的患者进行60分钟自主呼吸试验期间,对呼吸困难强度和描述词选择进行了研究。同时还测量了压力-时间乘积、呼吸力学和经皮二氧化碳分压(Ptc)。在辅助控制通气期间报告有呼吸困难的10例患者中,9例(90.0%)选择“空气不足”来描述呼吸困难。有呼吸困难的患者潮气量(Vt)设置低于无呼吸困难的患者(480.0 vs. 559.4 ml),P<0.046。在自主呼吸试验期间(n = 26),患者的呼吸困难(P<0.01)和Ptc(P<0.01)增加,但每分通气量([公式:见正文]e)无变化。呼吸困难评分与Ptc(P<0.012)和气道阻力(P<0.013)密切相关,但与呼吸功无关(尽管压力-时间乘积几乎比正常高3倍)。在试验进行到60分钟时,83.3%的患者单独或联合选择“空气不足”来描述不适,而只有16.7%的患者单独选择“用力过度”(P<0.001)。在整个呼吸困难范围内,患者压倒性地选择“空气不足”而非其他描述词选项(P<0.001)。在自主呼吸试验期间,患者的呼吸困难和Ptc增加,但每分通气量和呼吸功无变化;患者压倒性地选择气促描述词而非用力过度。这些观察结果支持这样一种观点,即气促是由于呼吸中枢刺激增强以及无法增加每分通气量所致。

相似文献

2
Non-invasive ventilation for cystic fibrosis.囊性纤维化的无创通气
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 20;2(2):CD002769. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002769.pub5.
8
Synchronized mechanical ventilation for respiratory support in newborn infants.新生儿呼吸支持的同步机械通气
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23(1):CD000456. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000456.pub3.
10
Neuromuscular paralysis for newborn infants receiving mechanical ventilation.接受机械通气的新生儿的神经肌肉麻痹
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;2005(2):CD002773. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002773.pub2.

本文引用的文献

4
Dyspnea and Mechanical Ventilation: The Emperor Has No Clothes.呼吸困难与机械通气:皇帝没穿衣服。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Apr 15;205(8):864-865. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202201-0078ED.
8
Why COVID-19 Silent Hypoxemia Is Baffling to Physicians.为什么 COVID-19 静默性低氧血症让医生感到困惑。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Aug 1;202(3):356-360. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202006-2157CP.
9
Low Tidal Volumes for Everyone?低潮气量通气策略适合所有人吗?
Chest. 2019 Oct;156(4):783-791. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
10
A Multidimensional Profile of Dyspnea in Hospitalized Patients.住院患者呼吸困难的多维特征。
Chest. 2019 Sep;156(3):507-517. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.04.128. Epub 2019 May 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验