Rowe Stephanie J, Bekhuis Youri, Mitchell Amy, Janssens Kristel, D'Ambrosio Paolo, Spencer Luke W, Paratz Elizabeth D, Claessen Guido, Fatkin Diane, La Gerche Andre
Heart, Exercise and Research Trials, St Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia; Cardiology Department, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/_sjrowe.
Department of Cardiology and Jessa & Science, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences/LCRC, UHasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium; Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/YouriBekhuis.
Can J Cardiol. 2025 Mar;41(3):364-374. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2024.12.017. Epub 2024 Dec 15.
Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) exists on a spectrum and is driven by a constellation of factors, including genetic and environmental differences. This results in wide interindividual variation in baseline CRF and the ability to improve CRF with regular endurance exercise training. As opposed to monogenic conditions, CRF is described as a complex genetic trait as it is believed to be influenced by multiple common genetic variants in addition to exogenous factors. Importantly, CRF is an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality, and so understanding the impact of genetic variation on CRF may provide insights into both human athletic performance and personalized risk assessment and prevention. Despite rapidly advancing technology, progress in this field has been restricted by small sample sizes and the limited number of genetic studies using the "gold standard" objective measure of peak oxygen consumption (VOpeak) for CRF assessment. In recent years, there has been increasing interest in the heritability of numerous parameters of cardiac structure and function and how this may relate to both normal cardiac physiology and disease pathology. Regular endurance training can result in exercise-induced cardiac remodelling, which manifests as balanced dilation of cardiac chambers and is associated with superior CRF. This results in a complex relationship between CRF, cardiac size, and exercise, and whether shared genetic pathways may influence this remains unknown. In this review we highlight recent and relevant studies into the genomic predictors of CRF with a unique emphasis on how this may relate to cardiac remodelling and human adaptation to endurance exercise.
心肺适能(CRF)存在一个连续谱,由一系列因素驱动,包括遗传和环境差异。这导致个体间在基线CRF以及通过定期耐力运动训练改善CRF的能力方面存在很大差异。与单基因疾病不同,CRF被描述为一种复杂的遗传性状,因为除了外部因素外,它还被认为受多种常见基因变异的影响。重要的是,CRF是发病率和死亡率的独立预测指标,因此了解基因变异对CRF的影响可能有助于深入了解人类运动表现以及个性化风险评估和预防。尽管技术发展迅速,但该领域的进展受到样本量小以及使用“金标准”客观指标——峰值耗氧量(VOpeak)进行CRF评估的基因研究数量有限的限制。近年来,人们对心脏结构和功能的众多参数的遗传性以及这与正常心脏生理学和疾病病理学的关系越来越感兴趣。定期耐力训练可导致运动诱导的心脏重塑,表现为心腔的平衡扩张,并与更高的CRF相关。这导致CRF、心脏大小和运动之间存在复杂的关系,共享的基因途径是否会影响这一点仍然未知。在这篇综述中,我们重点介绍了关于CRF基因组预测指标的最新相关研究,特别强调了这与心脏重塑以及人类对耐力运动的适应之间的关系。