Sorola Samu, Hyrylä Vesa, Eronen Timo, Kupari Saana, Venojärvi Mika, Tikkanen Heikki, Tarvainen Mika, Lindholm Harri
Institute of Biomedicine, Sports and Exercise Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Department of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Clin Auton Res. 2024 Dec 17. doi: 10.1007/s10286-024-01094-5.
Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy remains underdiagnosed in type 1 diabetes mellitus, posing a risk for severe complications, particularly in patients with lowered V̇O, compared to controls. This study aimed to determine whether heart rate variability during cardiovascular autonomic reflex tests reveals early signs of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in patients with uncomplicated type 1 diabetes mellitus and normal cardiovascular fitness, compared to healthy controls.
A type 1 diabetes mellitus group (n = 14) with no other diagnosed diseases (diabetes duration 15 ± 7 years) and a control group (n = 31) underwent deep breathing test, passive orthostatic test, and cardiopulmonary exercise test. Participants were assessed for heart rate variability, heart rate, blood pressure, and V̇O (mL/min/kg).
Participant characteristics, including V̇O (mL/min/kg), showed no significant differences. The type 1 diabetes mellitus group had higher systolic blood pressure during the supine phase of the orthostatic test than healthy controls (131.6 ± 14.7 mmHg vs. 122.4 ± 10.8 mmHg, p = 0.022). After 5 mins in the upright position, systolic blood pressure (132.2 ± 20.6 mmHg vs. 118.7 ± 11.7 mmHg, p = 0.036), heart rate (85 (76; 89) bpm vs. 75 (72; 83) bpm, p = 0.013), and the root mean square of successive RR interval differences (20.22 (11.22; 27.42) vs. 27.11 (19.90; 35.52), p = 0.033) were significantly different compared to controls.
Patients with uncomplicated type 1 diabetes mellitus, despite having normal cardiorespiratory fitness, exhibited higher systolic pressure and greater sympathetic activation in orthostatic tests, suggesting subclinically altered cardiovascular autonomic function.
心血管自主神经病变在1型糖尿病中仍未得到充分诊断,这会带来严重并发症的风险,尤其是与对照组相比,在静息氧耗降低的患者中。本研究旨在确定与健康对照组相比,在无并发症的1型糖尿病且心血管健康正常的患者中,心血管自主神经反射测试期间的心率变异性是否能揭示心血管自主神经病变的早期迹象。
一个无其他诊断疾病(糖尿病病程15±7年)的1型糖尿病组(n = 14)和一个对照组(n = 31)进行了深呼吸测试、被动直立位测试和心肺运动测试。对参与者进行心率变异性、心率、血压和静息氧耗(毫升/分钟/千克)的评估。
参与者特征,包括静息氧耗(毫升/分钟/千克),无显著差异。1型糖尿病组在直立位测试仰卧期的收缩压高于健康对照组(131.6±14.7毫米汞柱对122.4±10.8毫米汞柱,p = 0.022)。直立位5分钟后,收缩压(132.2±20.6毫米汞柱对118.7±11.7毫米汞柱,p = 0.036)、心率(85(76;89)次/分钟对75(72;83)次/分钟,p = 0.013)以及连续RR间期差值的均方根(20.22(11.22;27.42)对27.11(19.90;35.52),p = 0.033)与对照组相比有显著差异。
无并发症的1型糖尿病患者,尽管心肺功能正常,但在直立位测试中表现出更高的收缩压和更强的交感神经激活,提示心血管自主神经功能存在亚临床改变。