Suppr超能文献

基于社区的结核病主动病例发现:穿越复杂雷区

Community-based active-case finding for tuberculosis: navigating a complex minefield.

作者信息

MacPherson Peter, Shanaube Kwame, Phiri Mphatso D, Rickman Hannah M, Horton Katherine C, Feasey Helena R A, Corbett Elizabeth L, Burke Rachael M, Rangaka Molebogeng X

机构信息

School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

出版信息

BMC Glob Public Health. 2024 Feb 8;2(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s44263-024-00042-9.

Abstract

Community-based active case finding (ACF) for tuberculosis (TB) involves an offer of screening to populations at risk of TB, oftentimes with additional health promotion, community engagement and health service strengthening. Recently updated World Health Organization TB screening guidelines conditionally recommend expanded offer of ACF for communities where the prevalence of undiagnosed pulmonary TB is greater than 0.5% among adults, or with other structural risk factors for TB. Subclinical TB is thought to be a major contributor to TB transmission, and ACF, particularly with chest X-ray screening, could lead to earlier diagnosis. However, the evidence base for the population-level impact of ACF is mixed, with effectiveness likely highly dependent on the screening approach used, the intensity with which ACF is delivered, and the success of community- and health-system participation. With recent changes in TB epidemiology due to the effective scale-up of treatment for HIV in Africa, the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the importance of subclinical TB, researchers and public health practitioners planning to implement ACF programmes must carefully and repeatedly consider the potential population and individual benefits and harms from these programmes. Here we synthesise evidence and experience from implementing ACF programmes to provide practical guidance, focusing on the selection of populations, screening algorithms, selecting outcomes, and monitoring and evaluation. With careful planning and substantial investment, community-based ACF for TB can be an impactful approach to accelerating progress towards elimination of TB in high-burden countries. However, ACF cannot and should not be a substitute for equitable access to responsive, affordable, accessible primary care services for all.

摘要

基于社区的结核病主动病例发现(ACF)是指为结核病高危人群提供筛查,通常还会附加健康促进、社区参与和加强卫生服务等内容。世界卫生组织最近更新的结核病筛查指南有条件地建议,对于成人中未诊断肺结核患病率高于0.5%或存在其他结核病结构性风险因素的社区,扩大ACF的实施范围。亚临床结核病被认为是结核病传播的主要因素,而ACF,尤其是胸部X光筛查,可能会导致更早的诊断。然而,ACF对人群层面影响的证据基础并不一致,其有效性可能高度依赖于所采用的筛查方法、ACF的实施强度以及社区和卫生系统参与的成功程度。由于非洲有效扩大了艾滋病毒治疗规模、COVID-19大流行的影响以及亚临床结核病的重要性,结核病流行病学最近发生了变化,计划实施ACF项目的研究人员和公共卫生从业人员必须仔细且反复地考虑这些项目可能给人群和个体带来的益处和危害。在此,我们综合了实施ACF项目的证据和经验,以提供实用指导,重点关注人群选择、筛查算法、结果选择以及监测和评估。通过精心规划和大量投入,基于社区的结核病ACF可以成为高负担国家加速实现结核病消除目标的一种有效方法。然而,ACF不能也不应该替代为所有人提供公平的、反应迅速的、负担得起的和可及的初级保健服务。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fc9/11622870/075465f07779/44263_2024_42_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验