Pagliari Gabriele Giuseppe, Colonese Francesca, Canova Stefania, Abbate Maria Ida, Sala Luca, Petrella Francesco, Clementi Thoma Dario, Cortinovis Diego Luigi
Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy.
Medicine and Surgery Department, Milano Bicocca University, 20126 Milan, Italy.
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Nov 21;16(23):3892. doi: 10.3390/cancers16233892.
According to a modern view, cancer no longer follows a purely mechanistic model. Rather, a tumor is conceived as a more complex structure, composed of cancer cells, the activities of which may interact and reshape the so-called tumor microenvironment (TME), leading to preservation of specific tumoral niches and promoting the survival of tumoral stem cells. : Therapeutic strategies must deal with this unique cancer architecture in the near future by widening their range of activities outside the cancer cells and rewiring a TME to ensure it is hostile to cancer growth. Therefore, an intratumoral therapeutic strategy may open the door to a new type of anticancer activity, one that directly injures the tumoral structure while also eliciting an influence on the TME through local and systemic immunomodulation. This review would like to assess the current situation of intratumoral strategies and their clinical implications. We analyzed data from phase I, II, and III trials, comprehensive reviews and relevant clinical and preclinical research, from robust databases, like PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov. Intratumoral strategies can be quite variable. It is possible the injection and inhalation of traditional antiblastic agents or immunomodulant agents, or intrapleural administration. Ablation strategy is available, both thermal and photodynamic method. Moreover, TTfields and NPs are analyzed and also brachytherapy is mentioned. Intratumoral therapy can find space in "adjuvant"/perioperative or metastatic settings. Finally, intratumoral strategies allow to synergize their activities with systemic therapies, guaranteeing better local and systemic disease control. Intratumoral strategies are overall promising. Antiblastic/immunomodulant injection and NPs use are especially interesting and intriguing. But, there is generally a lack of phase II and III trials, in particular NPs use need additional experimentation and clinical studies.
根据现代观点,癌症不再遵循纯粹的机械模型。相反,肿瘤被认为是一种更复杂的结构,由癌细胞组成,癌细胞的活动可能相互作用并重塑所谓的肿瘤微环境(TME),从而导致特定肿瘤龛的保留并促进肿瘤干细胞的存活。治疗策略必须在不久的将来通过扩大其在癌细胞外的活动范围并重新调整肿瘤微环境以确保其对癌症生长不利,来应对这种独特的癌症结构。因此,瘤内治疗策略可能为一种新型抗癌活性打开大门,这种活性直接损伤肿瘤结构,同时还通过局部和全身免疫调节对肿瘤微环境产生影响。本综述旨在评估瘤内治疗策略的现状及其临床意义。我们分析了来自I期、II期和III期试验、全面综述以及相关临床和临床前研究的数据,这些数据来自强大的数据库,如PUBMED、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆和clinicaltrials.gov。瘤内治疗策略可能多种多样。可以注射和吸入传统的抗增殖药物或免疫调节药物,或进行胸膜内给药。消融策略也可行,包括热消融和光动力方法。此外,还分析了肿瘤治疗电场(TTfields)和纳米颗粒(NPs),并提及了近距离放射治疗。瘤内治疗可以在“辅助”/围手术期或转移性环境中发挥作用。最后,瘤内治疗策略能够使其活性与全身治疗协同作用,保证更好地控制局部和全身疾病。瘤内治疗策略总体上很有前景。抗增殖/免疫调节注射和纳米颗粒的使用尤其有趣且引人关注。但是,通常缺乏II期和III期试验,特别是纳米颗粒的使用需要更多的实验和临床研究。