Wang Yaodong, Song Weitao, Wang Qian, Yang Fafa, Yan Zhengang
College of Information Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China.
Animals (Basel). 2024 Nov 28;14(23):3452. doi: 10.3390/ani14233452.
The objective of this study was to develop linear and nonlinear statistical models for predicting enteric methane emissions from beef and dairy cattle (EME, MJ/day). Ration nutrient composition (g/kg), nutrient (kg/day), energy (MJ/day), and energy and organic matter (OM) digestibility (g/kg) were used as predictors of CH production. Three databases of beef cattle, dairy cattle, and their combinations were developed using 34 published experiments to model EME predictions. Linear and nonlinear regression models were developed using a mixed-model approach to predict CH production (MJ/day) of individual animals based on feed composition. For the beef cattle database, Equation methane (MJ/d) = 1.6063 (±0.757) + 0.4256 (±0.0745) × DMI + 1.2213 (±0.1715) × NDFI + -0.475 (±0.446) × ADFI had the smallest RMSPE (21.99%), with 83.51% of this coming from random error and a regression bias was 16.49%. For the dairy cattle database, the RMSPE was minimized (15.99%) for methane (MJ/d) = 0.3989 (±1.1073) + 0.8685 (±0.1585) × DMI + 0.6675 (±0.4264) × NDFI, of which 85.11% was from random error and the regression deviation was 14.89%. When the beef and dairy cattle databases were combined, the RMSPE was minimized (24.4%) for methane(MJ/d) = -0.3496 (±0.723) + 0.5941 (±0.0851) × DMI + 1.388 (±0.2203) × NDFI + -0.027 (±0.4223) × ADFI, of which 85.62% was from the random error and the regression bias was 14.38%. Among the nonlinear equations for the three databases, the DMI-based exponential model outperformed the other nonlinear models, but the predictability and goodness of fit of the equations did not improve compared to the linear model. The existing equations overestimate CH production with low accuracy and precision. Therefore, the equations developed in this study improve the preparation of methane inventories and thus improve the estimation of methane production in beef and dairy cattle.
本研究的目的是开发线性和非线性统计模型,用于预测肉牛和奶牛的肠道甲烷排放量(EME,兆焦耳/天)。日粮营养成分(克/千克)、营养素(千克/天)、能量(兆焦耳/天)以及能量和有机物质(OM)消化率(克/千克)被用作甲烷产生量的预测指标。利用34个已发表的实验建立了肉牛、奶牛及其组合的三个数据库,以对EME预测进行建模。采用混合模型方法开发线性和非线性回归模型,根据饲料组成预测个体动物的甲烷产生量(兆焦耳/天)。对于肉牛数据库,方程甲烷(兆焦耳/天)= 1.6063(±0.757)+ 0.4256(±0.0745)×干物质摄入量 + 1.2213(±0.1715)×中性洗涤纤维摄入量 + -0.475(±0.446)×酸性洗涤纤维摄入量的均方根预测误差(RMSPE)最小(21.99%),其中83.51%来自随机误差,回归偏差为16.49%。对于奶牛数据库,甲烷(兆焦耳/天)= 0.3989(±1.1073)+ 0.8685(±0.1585)×干物质摄入量 + 0.6675(±0.4264)×中性洗涤纤维摄入量的RMSPE最小(15.99%),其中85.11%来自随机误差,回归偏差为14.89%。当肉牛和奶牛数据库合并时,甲烷(兆焦耳/天)= -0.3496(±0.723)+ 0.5941(±0.0851)×干物质摄入量 + 1.388(±0.2203)×中性洗涤纤维摄入量 + -0.027(±0.4223)×酸性洗涤纤维摄入量的RMSPE最小(24.4%),其中85.62%来自随机误差,回归偏差为14.38%。在三个数据库的非线性方程中,基于干物质摄入量的指数模型优于其他非线性模型,但与线性模型相比,方程的可预测性和拟合优度并未提高。现有方程对甲烷产生量的高估精度较低。因此,本研究开发的方程改进了甲烷清单的编制,从而提高了肉牛和奶牛甲烷产生量的估计。