Munir Riffat, Schapkaitz Elise, Noble Lara, Loonat Sakina, McCree Melanie, Ali Nazeer, Jacobson Barry, Stevens Wendy Susan, Scott Lesley Erica
Wits Diagnostic Innovation Hub, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa.
Haematology Department, University of the Witwatersrand and the National Health Laboratory Services, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Nov 28;14(23):2683. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14232683.
The International Normalized Ratio (INR) monitors anticoagulant treatment but relies on laboratory-based services. This could limit access to rapid monitoring and increase the diagnostic delay, both of which may be addressed by point-of-care testing (POCT). This study investigated the LumiraDx POC platform for INR monitoring.
INR was measured on recalcified residual venous ( = 94) specimens from Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital and capillary blood specimens ( = 254) from consenting enrolled participants at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital Anticoagulation clinic, Johannesburg, South Africa. Standard-of-care (SOC) INR was measured on sodium-citrated venous blood using the Sysmex-CS2500 platform (Siemens Healthcare) and Neoplastin-R (Roche Diagnostics and Diagnostica Stago, Paris, France) within 2 h post-venipuncture. Within run, precision was measured using 2 LumiraDx control levels. The statistical agreement of paired INR measurements was also stratified by dosing decision.
The precision was within the manufacturer's claim for controls (level 1%CV: 3.63, level 2%CV: 2.24). Accuracy analysis showed a moderate overall agreement compared to the SOC INR results with a correlation coefficient of 0.94 (95% Cl, (0.9267 to 0.9497)). The overall precision (ρ > 0.9) and accuracy (C = 0.9842) were good with an absolute bias of 0.07. The 95% confidence intervals for the slope and intercept did not include 1.00 and 0.00, respectively; however, the total calculated error was within the minimal acceptable limits.
The LumiraDx INR Test showed a good performance compared to laboratory-based testing and provided opportunity for rapid and patient-centric care. Owing to an increasing positive bias for INR > 3.5, confirmation with laboratory INR measurements may be required.
国际标准化比值(INR)用于监测抗凝治疗,但依赖实验室检测服务。这可能会限制快速监测的可及性并增加诊断延迟,而即时检验(POCT)或许可以解决这两个问题。本研究调查了用于INR监测的LumiraDx即时检验平台。
在南非约翰内斯堡夏洛特·马克西克学术医院抗凝门诊,对来自克里斯·哈尼·巴拉干纳特医院的再钙化残余静脉血标本(n = 94)以及来自同意参与研究的受试者的毛细血管血标本(n = 254)进行INR检测。在静脉穿刺后2小时内,使用Sysmex-CS2500平台(西门子医疗)和Neoplastin-R(罗氏诊断和法国巴黎Diagnostica Stago公司)对枸橼酸钠抗凝静脉血进行标准护理(SOC)INR检测。在检测过程中,使用2个LumiraDx质控水平测量精密度。配对INR测量值的统计一致性也根据给药决策进行分层。
精密度在制造商对质控品的规定范围内(水平1%CV:3.63,水平2%CV:2.24)。准确性分析显示,与SOC INR结果相比总体一致性中等,相关系数为0.94(95%CI,(0.9267至0.9497))。总体精密度(ρ>0.9)和准确性(C = 0.9842)良好,绝对偏差为0.07。斜率和截距的95%置信区间分别不包括1.00和0.00;然而,计算出的总误差在可接受的最小范围内。
与基于实验室的检测相比,LumiraDx INR检测表现良好,并为快速且以患者为中心的护理提供了机会。由于INR>3.5时正偏差增加,可能需要用实验室INR测量结果进行确认。