• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住院老年受试者膳食回顾法的比较

Dietary recall method comparison for hospitalized elderly subjects.

作者信息

Evans H K, Gines D J

出版信息

J Am Diet Assoc. 1985 Feb;85(2):202-5.

PMID:3968357
Abstract

A study was made to compare accuracy of the 24-hour recall, including both number of items recalled and amounts of food eaten, for elderly subjects using three methods: I, unaided oral recall, II, printed questionnaire, and III, interview with actual-size color pictures of foods. Sixty hospitalized patients, age 65 to 94, were interviewed. Factors studied for influence on scores were age, sex, educational level, obesity, place of residence, and food preparer. Results showed no significant difference in scores owing to method used, except that 30 subjects above the median age of 76 scored higher on number of items recalled and amounts of food eaten when using the printed questionnaire. None of the demographic factors studied made a significant difference in scores.

摘要

一项研究旨在比较三种方法用于老年受试者时24小时回忆的准确性,包括回忆的食物种类数量和进食量:方法一,无辅助口头回忆;方法二,纸质问卷;方法三,使用食物实际大小彩色图片进行访谈。研究对60名年龄在65至94岁的住院患者进行了访谈。研究探讨了年龄、性别、教育程度、肥胖、居住地点和食物制备者等因素对得分的影响。结果显示,因使用方法不同,得分无显著差异,但76岁中位数年龄以上的30名受试者在使用纸质问卷时,回忆的食物种类数量和进食量得分更高。所研究的人口统计学因素在得分上均无显著差异。

相似文献

1
Dietary recall method comparison for hospitalized elderly subjects.住院老年受试者膳食回顾法的比较
J Am Diet Assoc. 1985 Feb;85(2):202-5.
2
Validity of the 24-hour dietary recall.
J Am Diet Assoc. 1985 Nov;85(11):1437-42.
3
Long-term (24-year) recall reliability in cancer cases and controls using a 21-item food frequency questionnaire.
Nutr Cancer. 1989;12(2):135-49. doi: 10.1080/01635588909514012.
4
Prompting methods affect the accuracy of children's school lunch recalls.提示方法会影响儿童对学校午餐回忆的准确性。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2000 Aug;100(8):911-8. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(00)00264-9.
5
Telephone vs face-to-face interviews for quantitative food frequency assessment.用于定量食物频率评估的电话访谈与面对面访谈
J Am Diet Assoc. 1998 Jan;98(1):44-8. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(98)00013-3.
6
Accuracy of dietary recall using the USDA five-step multiple-pass method in men: an observational validation study.采用美国农业部五步多次通过法对男性进行饮食回忆的准确性:一项观察性验证研究。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2004 Apr;104(4):595-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2004.01.007.
7
Accuracy of telephone dietary recalls in elderly subjects.老年受试者电话饮食回忆法的准确性
J Am Diet Assoc. 1990 Dec;90(12):1680-7.
8
Using memory strategies to improve 24-hour dietary recalls among older adults.运用记忆策略改善老年人的24小时饮食回忆。
J Allied Health. 2003 Fall;32(3):196-201.
9
Patient perception of risk factors in head and neck cancer.患者对头颈部癌症危险因素的认知。
Head Neck. 2009 Mar;31(3):355-60. doi: 10.1002/hed.20970.
10
Determinants of long-term (24-year) diet recall ability using a 21-item food frequency questionnaire.使用21项食物频率问卷对长期(24年)饮食回忆能力的决定因素。
Nutr Cancer. 1989;12(2):151-60. doi: 10.1080/01635588909514013.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of an Innovative Method for Calculating Energy Intake of Hospitalized Patients.一种计算住院患者能量摄入量的创新方法的评估
Nutrients. 2016 Sep 9;8(9):557. doi: 10.3390/nu8090557.