Ronsini Carlo, Iavarone Irene, Carotenuto Alessandro, Raffone Antonio, Andreoli Giada, Napolitano Stefania, De Franciscis Pasquale, Ambrosio Domenico, Cobellis Luigi
Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Nov 29;12(23):2404. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12232404.
Endometrial cancer (EC) is, nowadays, the most frequent gynecological malignancy worldwide. The main treatment approach for EC is surgery, especially for early-stage tumors. For advanced EC, chemotherapy (CT) with carboplatin and paclitaxel is the standard treatment, especially for women with metastatic or recurrent disease. The present systematic review aimed to establish whether neoadjuvant treatment regimens with CT and/or radiotherapy (RT) lead to better survival outcomes compared to upfront surgery in advanced EC. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, through the string "(("Endometrial Neoplasms"[Mesh]) AND "Hysterectomy"[Mesh]) AND "Radiotherapy"[Mesh] AND Chemotherapy", the selection of articles was made. A quality assessment was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The studies included patients with EC with survival and recurrence outcomes-patients treated with upfront surgery or neoadjuvant CT ± External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT) or CT ± Brachytherapy (BT). According to the selected evidence in the scientific literature, the 5-year DFS was 21.3% for upfront surgery and ranged from 42 to 73% for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Also, the 5-year OS was 6.2 to 49.7% with upfront surgery and 15.5 to 100% for neoadjuvant schemes. None of the studies dedicated to surgery reported the 5-year Recurrence Rate (RR), while in the neoadjuvant treatments, it ranged from 27 to 64.7%. The literature's paucity of data makes it difficult to compare neoadjuvant therapy regimens with upfront surgery in advanced endometrial carcinoma. Nevertheless, the current data show more encouraging results for the neoadjuvant treatment group.
子宫内膜癌(EC)是目前全球最常见的妇科恶性肿瘤。EC的主要治疗方法是手术,尤其是早期肿瘤。对于晚期EC,以卡铂和紫杉醇进行化疗(CT)是标准治疗方法,特别是对于有转移或复发性疾病的女性。本系统评价旨在确定与晚期EC直接手术相比,采用CT和/或放疗(RT)的新辅助治疗方案是否能带来更好的生存结果。按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明,通过检索词“(("子宫内膜肿瘤"[医学主题词]) AND "子宫切除术"[医学主题词]) AND "放疗"[医学主题词] AND 化疗”筛选文章。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)进行质量评估。纳入研究的患者为患有EC且有生存和复发结果的患者,这些患者接受直接手术或新辅助CT±外照射放疗(EBRT)或CT±近距离放疗(BT)治疗。根据科学文献中所选证据,直接手术的5年无病生存率(DFS)为21.3%,新辅助化疗的DFS为42%至73%。此外,直接手术的5年总生存率(OS)为6.2%至49.7%,新辅助方案的OS为15.5%至100%。所有专门针对手术的研究均未报告5年复发率(RR),而在新辅助治疗中,RR为27%至64.7%。文献中数据匮乏,难以在晚期子宫内膜癌中将新辅助治疗方案与直接手术进行比较。尽管如此,目前的数据显示新辅助治疗组的结果更令人鼓舞。