• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结合抽吸辅助柔性接入鞘的小直径(7.5 Fr)一次性使用带直视镜内抽吸(DISS)的柔性输尿管镜:真正无石的新热潮?

Small Diameter (7.5 Fr) Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscopy with Direct In-Scope Suction (DISS) in Conjunction with Aspiration-Assisted Flexible Access Sheath: A New Hype for Real Stone-Free?

作者信息

Geavlete Petrișor, Mareș Cristian, Mulțescu Răzvan, Georgescu Dragoș, Ene Cosmin-Victor, Iordache Valentin, Geavlete Bogdan

机构信息

Department of Urology, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.

Department of Urology, "Saint John" Clinical Emergency Hospital, 042122 Bucharest, Romania.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 27;13(23):7191. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237191.

DOI:10.3390/jcm13237191
PMID:39685650
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11642066/
Abstract

: Renal lithiasis continues to represent a great challenge for modern urology in terms of minimally invasive management of lithotripsy procedures. The recent revolution of endoscopes with the miniaturization of instruments and the development of improved disposable ureteroscopes combined with recent suction methods such as suction access sheaths or direct in-scope suction (DISS) systems promise to further improve the outcome of renal stone treatment. : Considering this technological advance, this study aims to evaluate the results obtained by combining these methods in three groups: Group 1-Single-use 7.5 Fr flexible ureteroscope with standard access sheath, Group 2-Single-use 7.5 Fr flexible ureteroscope with direct in-scope suction (DISS) with standard access sheath, Group 3-Single-use 7.5 Fr flexible ureteroscope with DISS with suction access sheath. A total number of 105 consecutive patients were enrolled in the study, divided equally in each group. Several parameters were followed, such as size and location of the stones, operative time, duration of hospitalization, the need for ureteral stent insertion, residual fragments, and subjective evaluation of the lithotripsy environment visualization. : The best results were highlighted in Group 3 for almost all evaluated parameters. Significant improvements were indicated in terms of stone-free rates. : Additional large studies are needed to support these initial results, but preliminary data indicate a valuable advantage for every urologist who treats urolithiasis.

摘要

就碎石手术的微创管理而言,肾结石病仍然是现代泌尿外科面临的巨大挑战。随着器械的小型化,内窥镜技术最近发生了变革,改进后的一次性输尿管镜的开发,再加上最近的抽吸方法,如抽吸接入鞘或直视下抽吸(DISS)系统,有望进一步改善肾结石治疗的效果。考虑到这一技术进步,本研究旨在评估三组联合使用这些方法所取得的结果:第一组——配备标准接入鞘的一次性7.5 Fr 软性输尿管镜;第二组——配备标准接入鞘且带有直视下抽吸(DISS)功能的一次性7.5 Fr 软性输尿管镜;第三组——配备抽吸接入鞘且带有DISS功能的一次性7.5 Fr 软性输尿管镜。共有105例连续患者纳入本研究,每组人数均等。记录了几个参数,如结石的大小和位置、手术时间、住院时间、输尿管支架置入的必要性、残余碎片以及对碎石环境可视化的主观评估。几乎所有评估参数在第三组中都表现出最佳结果。在无结石率方面有显著改善。需要更多大型研究来支持这些初步结果,但初步数据表明,这对每位治疗尿路结石病的泌尿外科医生都具有宝贵的优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8d0/11642066/7d2a33eb449f/jcm-13-07191-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8d0/11642066/3d7956078634/jcm-13-07191-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8d0/11642066/0e61c2cb0355/jcm-13-07191-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8d0/11642066/b64ff02ad8e4/jcm-13-07191-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8d0/11642066/bf89c81811e9/jcm-13-07191-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8d0/11642066/7d2a33eb449f/jcm-13-07191-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8d0/11642066/3d7956078634/jcm-13-07191-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8d0/11642066/0e61c2cb0355/jcm-13-07191-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8d0/11642066/b64ff02ad8e4/jcm-13-07191-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8d0/11642066/bf89c81811e9/jcm-13-07191-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8d0/11642066/7d2a33eb449f/jcm-13-07191-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Small Diameter (7.5 Fr) Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscopy with Direct In-Scope Suction (DISS) in Conjunction with Aspiration-Assisted Flexible Access Sheath: A New Hype for Real Stone-Free?结合抽吸辅助柔性接入鞘的小直径(7.5 Fr)一次性使用带直视镜内抽吸(DISS)的柔性输尿管镜:真正无石的新热潮?
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 27;13(23):7191. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237191.
2
Comparison of flexible ureteroscopic suction techniques: efficacy and safety of flexible and navigable access sheath (FANS) vs. direct in-scope suction (DISS) in the management of 2-3 cm lower pole renal stones.软性输尿管镜吸引技术的比较:软性可导航鞘(FANS)与直视下镜内吸引(DISS)在处理2-3厘米下极肾结石中的疗效与安全性
Urolithiasis. 2025 Apr 19;53(1):75. doi: 10.1007/s00240-025-01748-7.
3
Aspiration properties of flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) and flexible ureteroscope with direct-in-scope suction (DISS): an in-vitro experimental study by EAU young academic urologists (YAU) urolithiasis and endourology working group.可弯曲可导航输尿管吸引鞘(FANS)和带直视下吸引功能(DISS)的可弯曲输尿管镜的吸引特性:欧洲泌尿外科学会青年学术泌尿外科医生(YAU)尿石症与腔内泌尿外科工作组的一项体外实验研究
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Feb 10. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04405-5.
4
First clinical evaluation of a flexible digital ureteroscope with direct in scope suctioning system (Pusen DISS 7.5Ch): prospective multicentric feasibility study.首款具有直接镜内抽吸系统的软性数字输尿管镜(Pusen DISS 7.5Ch)的首次临床评估:前瞻性多中心可行性研究。
World J Urol. 2024 Oct 3;42(1):560. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05275-9.
5
Introducing a new device for direct in-scope suction technique during flexible ureteroscopy for kidney stone disease: an EAU Section of Endourology prospective multicenter audit using the GLITZ system.介绍一种用于肾结石疾病软性输尿管镜检查期间直接镜内抽吸技术的新设备:欧洲泌尿外科学会腔内泌尿外科分会使用GLITZ系统进行的前瞻性多中心审计。
Ther Adv Urol. 2025 Feb 20;17:17562872251320807. doi: 10.1177/17562872251320807. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
6
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Lithiasis Using Suctioning Devices: A Shift in Paradigm?使用抽吸装置的逆行性肾内手术治疗结石:治疗模式的转变?
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 24;13(9):2493. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092493.
7
Multicenter outcome analysis of different sheath sizes for Flexible and Navigable Suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) ureteroscopy: an EAU Endourology collaboration with the global FANS study group.多中心不同鞘径的 Flexi 和 Navi 输尿管软镜取石术(FANS)用可弯曲输尿管导引鞘应用效果分析:EAU 腔内泌尿外科学会与全球 FANS 研究组的合作研究
Urolithiasis. 2024 Nov 15;52(1):162. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01662-4.
8
Technique, Feasibility, Utility, Limitations, and Future Perspectives of a New Technique of Applying Direct In-Scope Suction to Improve Outcomes of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Stones.应用直视镜内吸引新技术改善逆行性肾内手术治疗结石效果的技术、可行性、效用、局限性及未来展望
J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 27;11(19):5710. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195710.
9
Early clinical outcomes using a 6.3 Fr single use ureteroscope compared to a 7.5 Fr device.使用6.3 Fr一次性输尿管镜与7.5 Fr设备相比的早期临床结果。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 2;15(1):15362. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00515-3.
10
Could Use of a Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Be a Potential Game-changer in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery? Outcomes at 30 Days from a Large, Prospective, Multicenter, Real-world Study by the European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Section.使用可弯曲且可导航的输尿管吸引鞘会成为逆行性肾内手术中的潜在变革因素吗?来自欧洲泌尿外科学会尿石症分会一项大型、前瞻性、多中心、真实世界研究的30天结果。
Eur Urol Focus. 2024 Dec;10(6):975-982. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.05.010. Epub 2024 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of flexible and navigable suction access sheaths versus traditional access sheath in flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.可弯曲可导航吸引鞘与传统鞘在输尿管软镜碎石术中的疗效及安全性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
World J Urol. 2025 Aug 12;43(1):487. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05856-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Suction use in ureterorenoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.输尿管肾镜检查中吸引术的应用:比较研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
BJUI Compass. 2024 Jul 8;5(10):895-912. doi: 10.1002/bco2.408. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Tip bendable suction ureteral access sheath versus traditional sheath in retrograde intrarenal stone surgery: an international multicentre, randomized, parallel group, superiority study.逆行性肾内结石手术中可弯曲头部的输尿管鞘与传统鞘的对比:一项国际多中心、随机、平行组、优效性研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Jul 5;74:102724. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102724. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Scoping Review of Experimental and Clinical Evidence and Its Influence on Development of the Suction Ureteral Access Sheath.
经皮肾镜输尿管鞘的实验与临床证据综述及其对其发展的影响
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 May 16;14(10):1034. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14101034.
4
Assessment of Effectiveness and Safety of Aspiration-Assisted Nephrostomic Access Sheaths in PCNL and Intrarenal Pressures Evaluation: A Systematic Review of the Literature.经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)中抽吸辅助肾造瘘通道鞘的有效性和安全性评估及肾内压力评估:文献系统综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 26;13(9):2558. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092558.
5
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Lithiasis Using Suctioning Devices: A Shift in Paradigm?使用抽吸装置的逆行性肾内手术治疗结石:治疗模式的转变?
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 24;13(9):2493. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092493.
6
First worldwide report on safety and efficacy of using small 7.5 Fr scope for pediatric ureteroscopy: prospective pilot series from Europe.关于使用7.5 Fr小型输尿管镜进行小儿输尿管镜检查安全性和有效性的全球首份报告:来自欧洲的前瞻性试点系列研究。
Cent European J Urol. 2024;77(1):37-41. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2023.248. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
7
Efficacy of Aspiration-Assisted Ureteral Access Sheath (ClearPETRA) in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery.抽吸辅助输尿管通路鞘(ClearPETRA)在逆行性肾内手术中的疗效
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2024 May;34(5):420-424. doi: 10.1089/lap.2024.0076. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
8
Comparison of traditional and suctioning ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of renal calculi.传统输尿管取石鞘和负压吸引输尿管取石鞘在逆行肾内手术治疗肾结石中的比较。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Mar 2;409(1):81. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03275-2.
9
Is suction the future of endourology? Overview from EAU Section of Urolithiasis.抽吸术会是腔内泌尿外科的未来吗?来自欧洲泌尿外科学会尿石症分会的概述。
Ther Adv Urol. 2024 Feb 22;16:17562872241232275. doi: 10.1177/17562872241232275. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
10
Application of the direct in-scope suction technique in antegrade flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy for the removal of a large ureteric calculus in a kidney transplant recipient: A case report.直接视野内吸引技术在肾移植受者顺行性软性输尿管镜碎石术中用于清除大的输尿管结石的应用:一例报告
Urol Case Rep. 2024 Jan 21;53:102663. doi: 10.1016/j.eucr.2024.102663. eCollection 2024 Mar.