Suppr超能文献

使用6.3 Fr一次性输尿管镜与7.5 Fr设备相比的早期临床结果。

Early clinical outcomes using a 6.3 Fr single use ureteroscope compared to a 7.5 Fr device.

作者信息

Geavlete Petrisor-Aurelian, Bulai Catalin-Andrei, Multescu Razvan-Dragos, Ene Cosmin-Victor, Militaru Adrian, Punga Ana-Maria Andreea, Geavlete Bogdan-Florin

机构信息

"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.

"Saint John" Emergency Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 May 2;15(1):15362. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00515-3.

Abstract

Flexible ureteroscopy is a cornerstone in minimally invasive urology, providing effective management of kidney stones and other urological conditions. The emergence of single-use ureteroscopes addresses challenges associated with reusable devices, such as cross-contamination, maintenance costs, and degradation over time. This prospective, single-center study compared the performance of the 6.3 Fr single-use flexible ureteroscope to the 7.5 Fr model in the treatment of kidney stones ≤ 2 cm. Forty patients were divided into two groups of 20, with preoperative assessments including CT scans and urine cultures. All patients underwent flexible ureteroscopy with thulium fiber laser lithotripsy under general anesthesia, and stone-free rates (SFRs) were assessed via CT at one month postoperatively. The 6.3 Fr ureteroscope achieved a significantly higher SFR of 95% compared to 92.9% with the 7.5 Fr model (p = 0.042). Mean operative times were 58 min (6.3 Fr) vs. 62.5 min (7.5 Fr), with no statistically significant differences in laser time or total energy used. Energy efficiency was 0.047 mm/J (6.3 Fr) vs. 0.035 mm/J (7.5 Fr), while energy consumption was 20.89 J/mm vs. 28.34 J/mm, respectively. Both devices exhibited low complication rates, with only minor complications (Clavien-Dindo grades 1 and 2) reported. Postoperative ureteral mucosal injury was assessed intraoperatively, and no cases exceeded Grade 1. This study highlights the safety and efficacy of the 6.3 Fr ureteroscope, demonstrating comparable or superior outcomes to the 7.5 Fr model in terms of SFR and operative time. While economic and sterility benefits were not evaluated, the findings support the adoption of smaller-diameter devices for minimally invasive procedures, though further studies are warranted to validate their broader clinical impact.

摘要

可弯曲输尿管镜检查是微创泌尿外科的基石,可有效治疗肾结石及其他泌尿系统疾病。一次性使用输尿管镜的出现解决了与可重复使用设备相关的挑战,如交叉污染、维护成本以及随时间推移的性能下降等问题。这项前瞻性单中心研究比较了6.3 Fr一次性使用可弯曲输尿管镜与7.5 Fr型号在治疗直径≤2 cm肾结石方面的性能。40例患者被分为两组,每组20例,术前评估包括CT扫描和尿培养。所有患者均在全身麻醉下接受可弯曲输尿管镜检查及铥光纤激光碎石术,并在术后1个月通过CT评估结石清除率(SFR)。6.3 Fr输尿管镜的结石清除率显著高于7.5 Fr型号,分别为95%和92.9%(p = 0.042)。平均手术时间分别为58分钟(6.3 Fr)和62.5分钟(7.5 Fr),激光使用时间和总能量使用方面无统计学显著差异。能量效率分别为0.047 mm/J(6.3 Fr)和0.035 mm/J(7.5 Fr),能量消耗分别为20.89 J/mm和28.34 J/mm。两种设备的并发症发生率均较低,仅报告了轻微并发症(Clavien-Dindo 1级和2级)。术中评估了术后输尿管黏膜损伤情况,无病例超过1级。本研究强调了6.3 Fr输尿管镜的安全性和有效性,在结石清除率和手术时间方面显示出与7.5 Fr型号相当或更优的结果。虽然未评估经济和无菌方面的益处,但研究结果支持采用较小直径的设备进行微创手术,不过仍需进一步研究以验证其更广泛的临床影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a71/12048471/47bd539e1867/41598_2025_515_Fig3_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验