Wang Xiaochen, Wang Peng, Wang Lulu, Ding Tao
Department of Pharmacy, Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital, Dongying City, China.
Department of Spine Surgery, Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital, Dongying City, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Dec 13;103(50):e40913. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040913.
Tubular microdiscectomy is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for microdiscectomy in improving perioperative clinical outcomes in patients with LDH. This study retrospectively analyzed the prospectively collected perioperative outcomes of patients in pre-ERAS (January 2020 to December 2021) and post-ERAS (January 2022 to September 2023) groups. Length of stay was the primary outcome measure, while secondary outcome measures included operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), postoperative first ambulation time, postoperative drainage volume, drainage tube removal time, complication rate, hospitalization cost, perioperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores for leg pain and low back pain (LBP), readmission rate within 30 days, and patient satisfaction rate. No significant differences in baseline parameters, including sex, age, body mass index, preoperative VAS scores for leg pain and LBP, and comorbidities, were observed between the groups. Additionally, operative time, complication rates, and 30-day readmission rates did not differ significantly between the groups. However, the post-ERAS group exhibited significantly lower length of stay compared to the pre-ERAS group (5.1 ± 1.2 vs 6.2 ± 1.6, P < .001). Additionally, the estimated blood loss (P < .001), drainage tube removal time (P < .001), postoperative drainage volume (P = .002), postoperative first ambulation time (P < .001), and hospitalization costs (P = .032) in the post-ERAS group were significantly lower in the pre-ERAS group. Furthermore, the LBP VAS score was significantly lower on the first day (P = .001) and third days (P = .002) postoperatively in the post-ERAS group, whereas the patient satisfaction rate on the first day (P = .036) postoperatively was significantly higher in the pre-ERAS group. Compared with the conventional pathway, the ERAS pathway in tubular microdiscectomy is associated with better perioperative clinical outcomes in patients with LDH.
管状显微椎间盘切除术是治疗腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)最常用的外科手术之一。本研究旨在探讨手术加速康复(ERAS)路径对显微椎间盘切除术改善LDH患者围手术期临床结局的有效性。本研究回顾性分析了前瞻性收集的ERAS前组(2020年1月至2021年12月)和ERAS后组(2022年1月至2023年9月)患者的围手术期结局。住院时间是主要结局指标,次要结局指标包括手术时间、估计失血量(EBL)、术后首次下床活动时间、术后引流量、引流管拔除时间、并发症发生率、住院费用、围手术期腿痛和腰痛(LBP)的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、30天内再入院率和患者满意率。两组之间在基线参数方面未观察到显著差异,包括性别、年龄、体重指数、术前腿痛和LBP的VAS评分以及合并症。此外,两组之间的手术时间、并发症发生率和30天再入院率无显著差异。然而,与ERAS前组相比,ERAS后组的住院时间显著缩短(5.1±1.2天对6.2±1.6天,P<.001)。此外,ERAS后组的估计失血量(P<.001)、引流管拔除时间(P<.001)、术后引流量(P=.002)、术后首次下床活动时间(P<.001)和住院费用(P=.032)均显著低于ERAS前组。此外,ERAS后组术后第一天(P=.001)和第三天(P=.002)的LBP VAS评分显著更低,而ERAS前组术后第一天(P=.036)的患者满意率显著更高。与传统路径相比,管状显微椎间盘切除术中的ERAS路径与LDH患者更好的围手术期临床结局相关。