Mundhra Rajlaxmi, Gupta Dipesh Kumar, Bahadur Anupama, Kumar Ajit, Kumar Rakesh
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Rishikesh, India.
Department of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Rishikesh, India.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2024 Mar 2;22:100295. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2024.100295. eCollection 2024 Jun.
With ever increasing rates of emergency caesarean deliveries (CD),incorporating the ERAS protocol might provide a perfect window of opportunity to increase maternal comfort during the postsurgical period, but also improve outcomes and facilitate optimal return of physiological function.
To determine whether an ERAS pathway at emergency caesarean birth would permit a reduction in postoperative length of stay and improve postoperative patient satisfaction.
MATERIAL & METHODS: Patients undergoing emergent caesarean delivery at ≥ 34 weeks of gestation were randomized to ERAS or conventional care. The primary outcome was to compare postoperative length of hospital stay. Secondary outcome variables included first oral intake, passage of flatus/defecation, first ambulation, first urination after catheter removal and postoperative pain scores in both groups.
We randomized 142 women (71 each in ERAS versus Conventional arm) undergoing emergency cesarean delivery. Incorporation of ERAS protocol resulted in shorter length of hospital stay (73.92 ± 8.96 in conventional arm vs 53.87 ± 15.02 in ERAS arm; p value <.0001). Significant difference was seen in visual analogue scoring during initial ambulation and rest on day 0 and day 1 between ERAS and conventional arms with mean scores being lower in ERAS arm compared to Conventional arm (p value <.05). In terms of quality of life, ERAS arm had better quality of life compared to conventional arm.
Incorporation of ERAS protocol in emergency caesarean definitely improves patient outcome in terms of early resumption of activities with better quality of life.
随着急诊剖宫产率的不断上升,纳入加速康复外科(ERAS)方案可能为提高术后产妇舒适度提供绝佳契机,同时改善预后并促进生理功能的最佳恢复。
确定急诊剖宫产时采用ERAS路径是否能缩短术后住院时间并提高患者术后满意度。
对妊娠≥34周行急诊剖宫产的患者随机分为ERAS组或传统护理组。主要结局是比较术后住院时间。次要结局变量包括两组的首次经口进食、排气/排便、首次下床活动、拔除导尿管后的首次排尿以及术后疼痛评分。
我们将142例行急诊剖宫产的女性患者(ERAS组和传统护理组各71例)进行了随机分组。采用ERAS方案使住院时间缩短(传统护理组为73.92±8.96,ERAS组为53.87±15.02;p值<.0001)。在术后第0天和第1天首次下床活动和休息时,ERAS组和传统护理组的视觉模拟评分存在显著差异,ERAS组的平均评分低于传统护理组(p值<.05)。在生活质量方面,ERAS组优于传统护理组。
在急诊剖宫产中纳入ERAS方案确实能在早期恢复活动及提高生活质量方面改善患者预后。