Suppr超能文献

中欧农业景观中不同栖息地植物、蜜蜂、食蚜蝇和蜘蛛的对比模式

Contrasting Patterns of Plants, Bees, Hoverflies and Spiders in Different Habitats in a Central European Agricultural Landscape.

作者信息

Vajna Flóra, Pellaton Raoul, Molnár Csaba, Soltész Zoltán, Gallé-Szpisjak Nikolett, Bihaly Áron Domonkos, Báldi András

机构信息

Lendület Ecosystem Services Research Group Institute of Ecology and Botany Vácrátót Hungary.

Freelance Researcher Basel Switzerland.

出版信息

Ecol Evol. 2024 Dec 16;14(12):e70711. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70711. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Semi-natural grasslands and their biodiversity decline rapidly, although they are key elements of agricultural landscapes. Therefore, there is a need for the re-establishment of semi-natural grasslands in intensively managed farmlands (e.g., via sowing wildflower seeds). Our knowledge, however, is limited on how different arthropod groups may respond to such newly established wildflower fields. This knowledge gap is especially relevant for the Pannonian biogeographical region, and more generally for Central Europe, where there is little to no evidence so far. We aimed to compare three different habitats (i.e., sown wildflower fields (WFF), semi-natural road verges and adjacent crop fields) in terms of their species and individual numbers and assemblage compositions to reveal differences between primary producers (plants), pollinators (bees and hoverflies) and predators (spiders). We selected eight landscapes in Central Hungary within conventionally managed crop areas. We analysed species and individual numbers by generalised linear mixed models (GLMM) and the assemblage composition with non-metric multidimensional scaling for each taxon in the three habitats. Crop, road verge and WFF habitats had distinct assemblages for each studied group, indicating clear separation among habitats. There are, however, contrasting patterns in the diversity measures of the studied groups. Crop fields are the poorest in both species and individual numbers, road verges harboured the highest abundance of spiders, while WFF had the most bees and plants. No clear pattern for hoverflies emerged. Our results suggest that the studied habitats do not harbour all groups in equal share. We propose that the design of future restorations in Central European farmlands should target a diversity of habitat types needed to support a wide range of functional groups.

摘要

半天然草地及其生物多样性正在迅速衰退,尽管它们是农业景观的关键要素。因此,有必要在集约化管理的农田中重新建立半天然草地(例如,通过播种野花种子)。然而,我们对于不同节肢动物类群如何响应此类新建立的野花田的了解有限。这一知识空白对于潘诺尼亚生物地理区域尤为重要,更广泛地说,对于中欧而言也是如此,因为迄今为止几乎没有相关证据。我们旨在比较三种不同的栖息地(即播种野花田(WFF)、半天然道路边缘和相邻的农田)在物种和个体数量以及群落组成方面的差异,以揭示初级生产者(植物)、传粉者(蜜蜂和食蚜蝇)和捕食者(蜘蛛)之间的差异。我们在匈牙利中部传统管理的作物种植区内选择了八个景观区域。我们通过广义线性混合模型(GLMM)分析物种和个体数量,并使用非度量多维尺度分析三种栖息地中每个分类单元的群落组成。对于每个研究的类群,作物、道路边缘和WFF栖息地具有不同的群落,表明栖息地之间有明显的区分。然而,在所研究类群的多样性度量方面存在相反的模式。农田在物种和个体数量方面都是最贫乏的,道路边缘有最高数量的蜘蛛,而WFF有最多的蜜蜂和植物。食蚜蝇没有出现明显的模式。我们的结果表明,所研究的栖息地并没有平等地容纳所有类群。我们建议,中欧农田未来恢复工作的设计应针对支持广泛功能类群所需的多种栖息地类型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34f0/11647180/b0daddc99ae1/ECE3-14-e70711-g002.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验