Karimi Mehdi, Pirzad Samira, Pourfaraji Seyed Morteza Ali, Parhizkar Roudsari Peyvand, Shirsalimi Niyousha, Ahmadizad Sajad
Faculty of Medicine, Bogomolets National Medical University (NMU), Kyiv, Ukraine.
Faculty of Medicine, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Medical Sciences Branch, Tehran, Iran.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Dec 2;11:1454921. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1454921. eCollection 2024.
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects 10% of the global population and leads to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Hemodialysis is a common treatment for ESRD, but patients often have low carnitine levels, leading to dyslipidemia, a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and the leading cause of mortality. This study aimed to assess the effects of L-carnitine on lipid profiles in adult hemodialysis patients.
A comprehensive search was conducted across the online databases from inception to June 2024 to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of L-carnitine on lipid profiles in hemodialysis patients. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed, focusing on primary outcomes, including changes in triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), and secondary outcomes including blood pressure (BP) and body mass index (BMI).
A total of 28 RCTs were eligible for the current systematic review, including 1,340 hemodialysis patients (671 intervention, 669 control). There were no significant differences in the mean change of TG (SMD: -0.006; 95% CI, -0.272 to 0.259; = 0.95), TC (SMD: -0.086; 95% CI, -0.253 to -0.079; = 0.29), HDL (SMD: 0.060; 95% CI, -0.057 to 0.177; = 0.29), LDL (SMD: -0.075; 95% CI, -0.274 to 0.123; = 0.43), VLDL (SMD: -0.064; 95% CI, -0.272 to 0.142; = 0.51), BMI (SMD: -0.025; 95% CI, -0.139 to 0.088; = 0.56), systolic BP (SMD: 0.055; 95% CI, -0.110 to 0.220; = 0.43), and diastolic BP (SMD: -0.028; 95% CI, 0.156 to 0.099; = 0.56). The same insignificant findings were observed after conducting a subgroup analysis based on the route of administration (intravenous . Oral).
L-carnitine supplementation does not significantly change and improve the serum lipid profile, including TG, TC, HDL, LDL, and VLDL levels. Additionally, it has no notable effects on BMI, systolic, or diastolic BP.
慢性肾脏病(CKD)影响全球10%的人口,并导致终末期肾病(ESRD)。血液透析是ESRD的常见治疗方法,但患者的肉碱水平往往较低,导致血脂异常,这是心血管疾病的一个危险因素,也是主要死因。本研究旨在评估左旋肉碱对成年血液透析患者血脂谱的影响。
对从开始到2024年6月的在线数据库进行全面检索,以识别评估左旋肉碱对血液透析患者血脂谱影响的随机临床试验(RCT)。进行了数据提取和质量评估,重点关注主要结局,包括甘油三酯(TG)、总胆固醇(TC)、高密度脂蛋白(HDL)、低密度脂蛋白(LDL)和极低密度脂蛋白(VLDL)的变化,以及次要结局,包括血压(BP)和体重指数(BMI)。
共有28项RCT符合当前的系统评价,包括1340名血液透析患者(671名干预组,669名对照组)。TG(标准化均数差:-0.006;95%置信区间,-0.272至0.259;P = 0.95)、TC(标准化均数差:-0.086;95%置信区间,-0.253至-0.079;P = 0.29)、HDL(标准化均数差:0.060;95%置信区间,-0.057至0.177;P = 0.29)、LDL(标准化均数差:-0.075;95%置信区间,-0.274至0.123;P = 0.43)、VLDL(标准化均数差:-0.064;95%置信区间,-0.272至0.142;P = 0.51)、BMI(标准化均数差:-0.025;95%置信区间,-0.139至0.088;P = 0.56)、收缩压(标准化均数差:0.055;95%置信区间,-0.110至0.220;P = 0.43)和舒张压(标准化均数差:-0.028;95%置信区间,0.156至0.099;P = 0.56)的平均变化无显著差异。在根据给药途径(静脉注射.口服)进行亚组分析后,也观察到了同样无显著意义的结果。
补充左旋肉碱不会显著改变和改善血清血脂谱,包括TG、TC、HDL、LDL和VLDL水平。此外,它对BMI、收缩压或舒张压没有显著影响。