• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparative analysis of ethical standards for the utilization of Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Brazil: Resolutions from 1992 to 2023.巴西辅助生殖技术应用伦理标准的比较分析:1992年至2023年的决议
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2025 Mar 12;29(1):6-12. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20240069.
2
[Critical analysis on the evolution of ethical norms for the use of assisted reproduction techniques in Brazil].
Cien Saude Colet. 2019 Mar;24(3):917-928. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232018243.30522016.
3
Pregnancy outcomes after assisted human reproduction.人类辅助生殖后的妊娠结局
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014 Jan;36(1):64-83. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30685-X.
4
Critical Analysis of The Changes in CFM Resolution 2294/21 And Its Impacts on Assisted Human Reproduction.CFM 分辨率 2294/21 的变化及其对辅助生殖的影响的批判性分析。
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2022 Nov 9;26(4):659-665. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20220007.
5
International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: assisted reproductive technology, 2014†.国际辅助生殖技术监测委员会世界报告:辅助生殖技术,2014 年†。
Hum Reprod. 2021 Oct 18;36(11):2921-2934. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab198.
6
In vitro fertilization and multiple pregnancies: an evidence-based analysis.体外受精与多胎妊娠:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(18):1-63. Epub 2006 Oct 1.
7
Quality of information provided by Brazilian Fertility Clinic websites: Compliance with Brazilian Medical Council (CFM) and American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) Guidelines.巴西生育诊所网站提供信息的质量:符合巴西医学委员会(CFM)和美国生殖医学学会(ASRM)指南。
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2023 Jun 22;27(2):169-173. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20220026.
8
Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Brazil: characterization of centers and profiles from patients treated.巴西的辅助生殖技术:治疗患者的中心和特征描述。
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2020 Jul 14;24(3):235-240. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20200001.
9
Assisted Conception Services and Regulation within the Brazilian Context.巴西背景下的辅助生殖服务与监管
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2015 Nov 1;19(4):198-203. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20150039.
10
International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: assisted reproductive technology 2012†.国际辅助生殖技术监测委员会世界报告:辅助生殖技术 2012 年报告†。
Hum Reprod. 2020 Aug 1;35(8):1900-1913. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa090.

本文引用的文献

1
Regulating non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal sex determination.规范非侵入性产前检测(NIPT)用于胎儿性别鉴定。
Med Law Rev. 2023 Nov 27;31(4):521-537. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwad014.
2
Epigenetic Risks of Medically Assisted Reproduction.医学辅助生殖的表观遗传风险
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 12;11(8):2151. doi: 10.3390/jcm11082151.
3
Critical Analysis of The Changes in CFM Resolution 2294/21 And Its Impacts on Assisted Human Reproduction.CFM 分辨率 2294/21 的变化及其对辅助生殖的影响的批判性分析。
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2022 Nov 9;26(4):659-665. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20220007.
4
Surrogacy and "Procreative Tourism". What Does the Future Hold from the Ethical and Legal Perspectives?代孕与“生育旅游”。从伦理和法律角度看未来会怎样?
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jan 8;57(1):47. doi: 10.3390/medicina57010047.
5
Founding pioneers of IVF update: Innovative researchers generating livebirths by 1982.体外受精的先驱们更新发现:创新研究者在 1982 年已经成功诞生活产儿。
Reprod Biol. 2020 Mar;20(1):111-113. doi: 10.1016/j.repbio.2019.12.008. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
6
The ethics of fertility treatment for same-sex male couples: Considerations for a modern fertility clinic.同性男性伴侣的生育治疗伦理:现代生育诊所的考虑因素。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Jan;244:71-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.11.011. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
7
[Critical analysis on the evolution of ethical norms for the use of assisted reproduction techniques in Brazil].
Cien Saude Colet. 2019 Mar;24(3):917-928. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232018243.30522016.
8
Racial classification regarding semen donor selection in Brazil.巴西精液捐献者选择中的种族分类。
Dev World Bioeth. 2007 Aug;7(2):104-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2007.00192.x.

巴西辅助生殖技术应用伦理标准的比较分析:1992年至2023年的决议

Comparative analysis of ethical standards for the utilization of Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Brazil: Resolutions from 1992 to 2023.

作者信息

Guedes Wanderlucia Arcelino, Santos Laisa Kimberly Rodrigues, Milanez Victoria Nascimento, Brito Marília Lima de, Moura Gabriel Acácio de, Monteiro Paula Bruno

机构信息

Christus University Center (Unichristus), Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.

Conceptus Center for Assisted Human Reproduction, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.

出版信息

JBRA Assist Reprod. 2025 Mar 12;29(1):6-12. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20240069.

DOI:10.5935/1518-0557.20240069
PMID:39688437
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11867254/
Abstract

Due to its documented records and technological achievements, in vitro embryo creation technology is still honored worldwide forty years after Louise Brown's birth on July 25, 1978. The World Health Organization (WHO) reports that one in six people globally who are of reproductive age may have infertility at some point in their lives. In this environment, it has become noteworthy for couples or patients to want to become pregnant through operations carried out by Assisted Human Reproduction Centers (AHRCs). This continual quest for AHRCs has already been demonstrated in Brazil, where data from the National Embryo Production System (SISEMBRIO) show that as of 2022, there were around 192 clinics nationally that offered AHRC services, and a total of 284,210 frozen embryos. The ethical conundrums that these techniques provide persist notwithstanding their remarkable success in helping patients achieve clinical pregnancies and viable embryos. The absence of legislation on reproductive assistance is another significant factor pertaining to Brazilian regulatory resolutions. As a result, clinics, hospitals, and sperm banks operating in this field are required to adhere to guidelines created by the Federal Council of Medicine (CFM). The first resolution was published on September 30, 1992. In light of the aforementioned, acquiring and keeping an eye on the standards that the CFM has developed over time helps enhance knowledge of the moral and legal framework that governs Brazil. Thus, the current study attempts to provide a comparative analysis of Brazilian ethical norms regarding the use of assisted human reproduction technology.

摘要

由于其有记录的历程和技术成就,体外胚胎培育技术在1978年7月25日路易丝·布朗出生后的四十年里,仍然在全球备受赞誉。世界卫生组织(WHO)报告称,全球六分之一的育龄人口在人生的某个阶段可能会遭遇不孕不育问题。在这种环境下,夫妇或患者希望通过辅助人类生殖中心(AHRCs)开展的手术来怀孕,这已变得值得关注。对AHRCs的这种持续需求在巴西已有体现,来自国家胚胎生产系统(SISEMBRIO)的数据显示,截至2022年,全国约有192家诊所提供AHRC服务,共有284,210个冷冻胚胎。尽管这些技术在帮助患者实现临床妊娠和获得可存活胚胎方面取得了显著成功,但它们所带来的伦理难题依然存在。生殖辅助方面缺乏立法是巴西监管决议的另一个重要因素。因此,在这一领域运营的诊所、医院和精子库必须遵守由巴西医学委员会(CFM)制定的指导方针。第一项决议于1992年9月30日发布。鉴于上述情况,了解并关注CFM多年来制定的标准,有助于增进对巴西道德和法律框架的认识。因此,本研究试图对巴西关于辅助人类生殖技术使用的伦理规范进行比较分析。