Suppr超能文献

磁共振成像声学噪声输出与听力保护装置性能综述

A Review of MRI Acoustic Noise Outputs and Hearing Protection Device Performance.

作者信息

Steckner Michael

机构信息

MKS Consulting, Beachwood, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2025 May;61(5):2083-2093. doi: 10.1002/jmri.29665. Epub 2024 Dec 17.

Abstract

The acoustic noise outputs of MR equipment typically require a hearing protection device (HPD) to minimize the likelihood of patient hearing loss. Several different ways to quantify HPD performance have been developed and adopted over many years in different countries across the world (eg, NRR, SNR, SLC80). These HPD evaluations are done in controlled laboratory conditions, following different standardized methodologies, producing different performance ratings for the same HPD, and consequently of a variable relationship with achieved real-world usage performance assessments. Conversely, the MR manufacturers follow one standard (NEMA MS-4) which strives to produce a worst-case peak and average acoustic noise output measurement. Measuring the acoustic output of MR equipment is a complex undertaking in the confined patient space, especially when considering the variability of what is in the patient imaging space. Given both the MR equipment acoustic output measurements and the HPD performance rating, it is theoretically possible to estimate the worst-case patient exposure level, subject to the uncertainty of how successfully the protection was applied and population variability. An assessment, shown here, suggests that the worst-case outputs from the loudest MR equipment requires the best passive HPD performance presently available in order to meet patient protection guidelines, but only when the HPD is properly deployed. However, when considering government agency derating recommendations that estimate protection achieved during practical application, the various metrics are not consistent in confirming that the best HPD provide sufficient protection. This paper reviews the challenges of determining and providing sufficient hearing protection. The correct deployment of HPD, and its verification, is thus a critical factor in ensuring adequate patient protection and the main concern of this review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.

摘要

磁共振设备的声学噪声输出通常需要听力保护装置(HPD),以尽量降低患者听力损失的可能性。多年来,在世界不同国家已开发并采用了几种不同的方法来量化HPD的性能(例如,噪声降低率、信噪比、SLC80)。这些HPD评估是在受控的实验室条件下,按照不同的标准化方法进行的,对于同一HPD会产生不同的性能评级,因此与实际使用中的性能评估存在可变关系。相反,磁共振设备制造商遵循一个标准(NEMA MS - 4),该标准力求进行最坏情况下的峰值和平均声学噪声输出测量。在有限的患者空间内测量磁共振设备的声学输出是一项复杂的工作,尤其是考虑到患者成像空间内物品的可变性时。鉴于磁共振设备的声学输出测量结果和HPD的性能评级,理论上可以估计最坏情况下的患者暴露水平,但会受到保护措施应用成功程度和人群差异的不确定性影响。此处所示的一项评估表明,最响亮的磁共振设备的最坏情况输出需要目前可获得的最佳被动HPD性能,才能符合患者保护指南,但前提是HPD要正确使用。然而,在考虑政府机构关于实际应用中估计保护效果的降额建议时,各种指标在确认最佳HPD是否提供足够保护方面并不一致。本文回顾了确定和提供充分听力保护所面临的挑战。因此,HPD的正确使用及其验证是确保患者得到充分保护的关键因素,也是本综述的主要关注点。证据水平:5 技术疗效:5期

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验