Glans Anton, Wennberg Linda, Wilén Jonna, Lindgren Lenita, Sundgren Pia C, Mårtensson Johan, Markenroth Bloch Karin, Hansson Boel
Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Department of Diagnostics and Intervention, Radiation Physics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2025 Mar 6. doi: 10.1002/jmri.29749.
MR-generated acoustic noise may be particularly concerning at 7-Tesla (T) systems. Noise levels can be reduced by altering gradient output using software optimization. However, such alterations might influence image quality or prolong scan times, and these optimizations have not been well characterized.
To evaluate image quality, sound pressure levels (SPLs), and perceived noise levels when using the acoustic noise reduction technique SofTone for T-weighted fast spin echo (TW FSE) and three-dimensional T-weighted turbo field echo (3D TW TFE), and to compare with conventional imaging during 7-T brain MRI.
Prospective.
Twenty-eight volunteers underwent brain MRI, with n = 26 for image quality evaluations.
FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Conventional and SofTone versions of TW FSE and 3D TW TFE at 7 T.
Peak SPLs (A-weighted decibels, dBA), participant-perceived noise levels (Borg CR10-scale), qualitative image assessments by three neuroradiologists (four-graded ordinal scales), interrater reliability, and percentage agreement.
Paired t-test, Wilcoxon's Signed-Rank Test, and Krippendorff's alpha; p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
SofTone significantly reduced peak SPLs: from 116.3 to 97.0 dBA on TW FSE, and from 123.7 to 101.5 dBA on 3D TW TFE. SofTone was perceived as significantly quieter than conventional scanning. TW FSE showed no significant differences in image quality assessments (p = 0.21-1.00), except one radiologist noting significantly less artifact interference with SofTone. General image quality remained acceptable for 3D TW TFE, though one radiologist scored it significantly lower with SofTone (mean scores: 3.08 vs. 3.65), and two radiologists observed significantly worse white and gray matter differentiation with SofTone (mean scores: 3.19 vs. 3.54; 2.27 vs. 2.81).
SofTone can significantly reduce sound intensity and perceived noise levels while maintaining acceptable image quality with TW FSE and 3D TW TFE in brain MRI. It appears to be an effective tool for providing a safer, quieter 7-T scan environment.
4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 5.
在7特斯拉(T)系统中,磁共振成像(MR)产生的声学噪声可能特别令人担忧。可以通过软件优化改变梯度输出以降低噪声水平。然而,这种改变可能会影响图像质量或延长扫描时间,并且这些优化尚未得到充分表征。
评估在使用声学降噪技术SofTone进行T加权快速自旋回波(TW FSE)和三维T加权涡轮场回波(3D TW TFE)时的图像质量、声压级(SPL)和感知噪声水平,并与7T脑MRI期间的传统成像进行比较。
前瞻性研究。
28名志愿者接受了脑部MRI检查,其中26名用于图像质量评估。
场强/序列:7T时TW FSE和3D TW TFE的传统版本和SofTone版本。
峰值声压级(A加权分贝,dBA)、受试者感知的噪声水平(Borg CR10量表)、三位神经放射科医生的定性图像评估(四级有序量表)、评分者间信度和一致性百分比。
配对t检验、Wilcoxon符号秩检验和Krippendorff's alpha;p < 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
SofTone显著降低了峰值声压级:TW FSE上从116.3 dBA降至97.0 dBA,3D TW TFE上从123.7 dBA降至101.5 dBA。SofTone被认为比传统扫描明显更安静。TW FSE在图像质量评估中没有显著差异(p = 0.21 - 1.00),除了一位放射科医生指出SofTone的伪影干扰明显更少。3D TW TFE的总体图像质量仍然可以接受,尽管一位放射科医生对SofTone的评分明显较低(平均得分:3.08对3.65),并且两位放射科医生观察到SofTone下白质和灰质分化明显更差(平均得分:3.19对3.54;2.27对2.81)。
在脑部MRI中,SofTone可以显著降低声音强度和感知噪声水平,同时在TW FSE和3D TW TFE中保持可接受的图像质量。它似乎是提供更安全、更安静的7T扫描环境的有效工具。
4 技术效能:5级。