Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助远程超声引导介入系统的初步应用。

Preliminary application of robot-assisted teleultrasound-guided interventional system.

作者信息

Liu Fangyi, Qi Erpeng, Wang Xiaopeng, Wang Yan, Gao Yuejuan, Yu Xiaoling, Liang Ping

机构信息

Department of Interventional Ultrasound,The Fifth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China, 100853.

Department ofGastroenterology, Chinese PLA 305 Hospital, Beijing, China, 100034.

出版信息

Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Jun;50(6):2626-2633. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04719-5. Epub 2024 Dec 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Teleultrasound has gained significant traction in clinical practice in recent years. However, studies focusing on remote interventional ultrasound remain limited.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of percutaneous puncture using a robot-assisted teleultrasound-guided interventional system (RTIS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was approved by the institutional animal ethics committee and human research review board. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Two experienced interventional ultrasound physicians performed percutaneous punctures using both RTIS and conventional ultrasound guidance (CUG) in phantom and swine liver models, as well as in clinical settings. Puncture distance errors and operation durations were compared between the RTIS and CUG groups in the experimental models. For clinical applications, operation duration, success rates, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed in puncture distance errors between the RTIS and CUG groups in the phantom study (2.85 ± 2.07 mm vs. 1.79 ± 1.93 mm; p = 0.158) or the swine liver study (3.28 ± 1.20 mm vs. 2.56 ± 0.98 mm; p = 0.148). However, puncture operation durations were significantly longer in the RTIS group compared to the CUG group across all scenarios: phantom study (50 ± 19 s vs. 19 ± 7 s; p < 0.001), swine liver study (106 ± 19 s vs. 61 ± 32 s; p = 0.001), and clinical application (200 ± 27.02 s vs. 104.8 ± 33.92 s; p < 0.001). All six patients in the RTIS group and ten patients in the CUG group successfully underwent percutaneous puncture without complications.

CONCLUSION

The RTIS demonstrated safety and feasibility for percutaneous puncture, providing comparable accuracy to conventional methods.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The RTIS offers a safe and effective solution for percutaneous puncture, with the potential to address the scarcity of medical resources in remote and underserved regions.

摘要

背景

近年来,远程超声在临床实践中得到了广泛应用。然而,针对远程介入超声的研究仍然有限。

目的

评估使用机器人辅助远程超声引导介入系统(RTIS)进行经皮穿刺的可行性和准确性。

材料与方法

本研究经机构动物伦理委员会和人体研究审查委员会批准。所有患者均签署了书面知情同意书。两名经验丰富的介入超声医师在模型、猪肝模型以及临床环境中,分别使用RTIS和传统超声引导(CUG)进行经皮穿刺。比较RTIS组和CUG组在实验模型中的穿刺距离误差和操作时间。对于临床应用,记录操作时间、成功率和并发症情况。

结果

在模型研究中(2.85±2.07毫米对1.79±1.93毫米;p=0.158)和猪肝研究中(3.28±1.20毫米对2.56±0.98毫米;p=0.148),RTIS组和CUG组的穿刺距离误差均无显著差异。然而,在所有情况下,RTIS组的穿刺操作时间均显著长于CUG组:模型研究(50±19秒对19±7秒;p<0.001)、猪肝研究(106±19秒对61±32秒;p=0.001)以及临床应用(200±27.02秒对104.8±33.92秒;p<0.001)。RTIS组的6例患者和CUG组的10例患者均成功进行了经皮穿刺,且无并发症发生。

结论

RTIS在经皮穿刺方面显示出安全性和可行性,其准确性与传统方法相当。

临床相关性声明

RTIS为经皮穿刺提供了一种安全有效的解决方案,有可能解决偏远和医疗资源匮乏地区医疗资源短缺的问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验