Suppr超能文献

癌症患者健康焦虑问卷的一个常用指标。

A common metric for questionnaires on health anxiety in cancer patients.

作者信息

Friedrich Michael, Schulte Thomas, Malburg Merle, Hinz Andreas

机构信息

Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.

Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 3;15:1455121. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1455121. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

After a cancer diagnosis, life is accompanied by worries, concerns and fears that the disease will recur or worsen. These can be normal and useful reactions but may also become so severe that they interfere with everyday functioning. A challenge for patient care is that the theoretical similarity of these reactions, is not consistently conceptualized in practice, hence the empirical comparability of their measures is unclear. Here we intend to show that the theoretical similarity is also empirically justified, and we present a common metric in graphical form that allows direct comparisons between different questionnaires. A total of 1,733 cancer patients completed the Fear of Progression Questionnaire Short Form, Questionnaire on Stress in Cancer Patients-revised version, Concerns About Recurrence Questionnaire, the subscales Health Distress and Negative Health Outlook of the EORTC QLQ-SURV100, and the Whiteley Index. Using a model based on item response theory, we linked the score values of the individual questionnaires. The main outcome of this study is a diagram that can be used to convert the respective values of eight questionnaires on health anxiety to another. All instruments showed a reliability above 0.75 near the mean health anxiety level. The common metric can be used to compare measurements with these questionnaires in terms of the level of health anxiety. Additionally, the reliability of the instruments can be judged at different levels of anxiety. This allows for a better comparability of test results and facilitates communication about the results among experts and with patients.

摘要

癌症确诊后,生活便伴随着对疾病复发或恶化的担忧、顾虑和恐惧。这些反应可能是正常且有益的,但也可能会变得非常严重,进而干扰日常功能。患者护理面临的一个挑战是,这些反应在理论上具有相似性,但在实践中并未得到一致的概念化,因此它们的测量指标在实证上的可比性尚不清楚。在此,我们旨在表明这种理论上的相似性在实证上也是合理的,并以图形形式呈现一种通用指标,该指标允许对不同问卷进行直接比较。共有1733名癌症患者完成了《恐惧进展问卷简表》《癌症患者压力问卷修订版》《复发担忧问卷》、欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QLQ-SURV100量表中的健康困扰和负面健康展望分量表,以及惠特利指数。我们使用基于项目反应理论的模型,将各个问卷的得分值联系起来。本研究的主要成果是一个图表,可用于将八份关于健康焦虑的问卷的相应值相互转换。在平均健康焦虑水平附近,所有量表的信度均高于0.75。这种通用指标可用于根据健康焦虑水平比较这些问卷的测量结果。此外,还可以在不同焦虑水平下判断量表的信度。这使得测试结果具有更好的可比性,并便于专家之间以及与患者就结果进行沟通。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e38/11649417/d95c3468c7be/fpsyg-15-1455121-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验