Suppr超能文献

癌症幸存者恐惧进展快速筛查工具:恐惧进展问卷快速筛查器。

Rapid screener for the assessment of fear of progression in cancer survivors: The Fear of progression-Questionnaire Rapid Screener.

机构信息

Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Centre Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021 May;30(3):e13400. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13400. Epub 2021 Jan 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Fear of progression (FoP) among cancer survivors can adversely affect all areas of life. Existing instruments are too long for implementation in routine care. Therefore, we developed and tested a rapid screener for FoP (FoP-Q-RS).

METHODS

Data were derived from a register-based study among cancer survivors. The 12-item short form of the Fear-of-Progression Questionnaire (FoP-Q-SF) served as item-pool. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was applied to determine (a) fit indices including comparative fit index (CFI) and standardised root mean square residual (SRMR) and (b) measures of reliability including composite reliability (CR). Fit indices were compared to the FoP-Q-SF. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated to recommend a cut-off (criterion: GAD-7 score ≥10).

RESULTS

One thousand two cancer survivors participated (response rate: 53%). We selected five items for the FoP-Q-RS. CFA indicated acceptable fit (CFI = 0.936; SRMR = 0.048) and reliability (CR = 0.793). Fit indices were better than for the FoP-Q-SF. The cut-off ≥12 showed optimal balance between sensitivity (72%) and specificity (70%), the cut-off ≥10 revealed higher sensitivity (86%) with still tolerable specificity (52%).

CONCLUSION

The FoP-Q-RS shows good psychometric properties and may be applied in routine care. Further studies on preferable cut-offs and other populations are needed.

摘要

目的

癌症幸存者的进展恐惧(Fear of Progression,FoP)可能会对生活的各个方面产生不利影响。现有的工具对于常规护理来说太长了。因此,我们开发并测试了一种用于 FoP 的快速筛查工具(FoP-Q-RS)。

方法

数据来自癌症幸存者的基于登记的研究。Fear-of-Progression Questionnaire(FoP-Q-SF)的 12 项简短形式作为项目池。应用验证性因子分析(Confirmatory Factor Analysis,CFA)来确定(a)拟合指数,包括比较拟合指数(Comparative Fit Index,CFI)和标准化均方根残差(Standardised Root Mean Square Residual,SRMR),以及(b)可靠性指标,包括综合可靠性(Composite Reliability,CR)。拟合指数与 FoP-Q-SF 进行了比较。计算了灵敏度和特异性以推荐一个截断值(标准:GAD-7 得分≥10)。

结果

共有 1200 名癌症幸存者参与(应答率:53%)。我们选择了 FoP-Q-RS 的五个项目。CFA 表明具有可接受的拟合度(CFI=0.936;SRMR=0.048)和可靠性(CR=0.793)。拟合指数优于 FoP-Q-SF。截断值≥12 显示出灵敏度(72%)和特异性(70%)之间的最佳平衡,截断值≥10 则显示出更高的灵敏度(86%),但特异性(52%)仍可接受。

结论

FoP-Q-RS 具有良好的心理测量学特性,可应用于常规护理。需要进一步研究其他人群的更优截断值。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验