• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善临床试验中的受试者招募:创新数字平台的比较分析

Improving Participant Recruitment in Clinical Trials: Comparative Analysis of Innovative Digital Platforms.

作者信息

Bikou Alexia Georgia, Deligianni Elena, Dermiki-Gkana Foteini, Liappas Nikolaos, Teriús-Padrón José Gabriel, Beltrán Jaunsarás Maria Eugenia, Cabrera-Umpiérrez Maria Fernanda, Kontogiorgis Christos

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.

Life Supporting Technologies (LifeSTech), Superior Technical School of Telecommunication Engineers, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 18;26:e60504. doi: 10.2196/60504.

DOI:10.2196/60504
PMID:39693619
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11694053/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pharmaceutical product development relies on thorough and costly clinical trials. Participant recruitment and monitoring can be challenging. The incorporation of cutting-edge technologies such as blockchain and artificial intelligence has revolutionized clinical research (particularly in the recruitment stage), enhanced secure data storage and analysis, and facilitated participant monitoring while protecting their personal information.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the use of novel digital platforms and their features, such as e-recruitment, e-consent, and matching, aiming to optimize and expedite clinical research.

METHODS

A review with a systematic approach was conducted encompassing literature from January 2000 to October 2024. The MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases were examined thoroughly using a customized search string. Inclusion criteria focused on digital platforms involving clinical trial recruitment phases that were in English and had international presence, scientific validation, regulatory approval, and no geographic limitations. Literature reviews and unvalidated digital platforms were excluded. The selected studies underwent meticulous screening by the research team, ensuring a thorough analysis of novel digital platforms and their use and features for clinical trials.

RESULTS

A total of 24 digital platforms were identified that supported clinical trial recruitment phases. In general, most of them (n=22, 80%) are headquartered and operating in the United States, providing a range of functionalities including electronic consent (n=14, 60% of the platforms), participant matching, and monitoring of patients' health status. These supplementary features enhance the overall effectiveness of the platforms in facilitating the recruitment process for clinical trials. The analysis and digital platform findings refer to a specific time frame when the investigation took place, and a notable surge was observed in the adoption of these novel digital tools, particularly following the COVID-19 outbreak.

CONCLUSIONS

This study underscores the vital role of the identified digital platforms in clinical trials, aiding in recruitment, enhancing patient engagement, accelerating procedures, and personalizing vital sign monitoring. Despite their impact, challenges in accessibility, compatibility, and transparency require careful consideration. Addressing these challenges is crucial for optimizing digital tool integration into clinical research, allowing researchers to harness the benefits while managing the associated risks effectively.

摘要

背景

药品研发依赖于全面且成本高昂的临床试验。参与者招募和监测可能具有挑战性。区块链和人工智能等前沿技术的融入彻底改变了临床研究(尤其是在招募阶段),增强了数据的安全存储和分析,并在保护参与者个人信息的同时便于对参与者进行监测。

目的

本研究旨在调查新型数字平台及其功能的使用情况,如电子招募、电子知情同意和匹配,以优化和加快临床研究。

方法

采用系统方法进行综述,涵盖2000年1月至2024年10月的文献。使用定制的搜索字符串对MEDLINE、ScienceDirect、Scopus和谷歌学术数据库进行了全面检索。纳入标准侧重于涉及临床试验招募阶段的数字平台,这些平台需为英文且具有国际影响力、经过科学验证、获得监管批准且无地域限制。排除文献综述和未经验证的数字平台。研究团队对所选研究进行了细致筛选,确保对新型数字平台及其在临床试验中的使用和功能进行全面分析。

结果

共识别出24个支持临床试验招募阶段的数字平台。总体而言,其中大多数(n = 22,80%)的总部设在美国并在美国运营,提供一系列功能,包括电子知情同意(n = 14,占平台的60%)、参与者匹配以及对患者健康状况的监测。这些补充功能提高了平台在促进临床试验招募过程中的整体有效性。分析和数字平台的研究结果涉及调查进行时的特定时间段,并且观察到这些新型数字工具的采用显著增加,尤其是在新冠疫情爆发之后。

结论

本研究强调了所识别的数字平台在临床试验中的重要作用,有助于招募、增强患者参与度、加快流程并实现生命体征监测的个性化。尽管它们具有影响力,但在可及性、兼容性和透明度方面的挑战仍需仔细考虑。应对这些挑战对于优化数字工具融入临床研究至关重要,使研究人员能够在有效管理相关风险的同时利用其优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4cc/11694053/0764ef1b8728/jmir_v26i1e60504_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4cc/11694053/0764ef1b8728/jmir_v26i1e60504_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4cc/11694053/0764ef1b8728/jmir_v26i1e60504_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving Participant Recruitment in Clinical Trials: Comparative Analysis of Innovative Digital Platforms.改善临床试验中的受试者招募:创新数字平台的比较分析
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 18;26:e60504. doi: 10.2196/60504.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Artificial intelligence to revolutionize IBD clinical trials: a comprehensive review.人工智能将彻底改变炎症性肠病临床试验:全面综述。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Feb 23;18:17562848251321915. doi: 10.1177/17562848251321915. eCollection 2025.
4
Digital technologies used in clinical trial recruitment and enrollment including application to trial diversity and inclusion: A systematic review.用于临床试验招募和入组的数字技术,包括在试验多样性和包容性方面的应用:一项系统综述。
Digit Health. 2024 Mar 28;10:20552076241242390. doi: 10.1177/20552076241242390. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
5
Digital Health Platform for Maternal Health: Design, Recruitment Strategies, and Lessons Learned From the PowerMom Observational Cohort Study.孕产妇健康数字健康平台:设计、招募策略及从PowerMom观察性队列研究中获得的经验教训
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Apr 7;9:e70149. doi: 10.2196/70149.
6
Using digital tools in the recruitment and retention in randomised controlled trials: survey of UK Clinical Trial Units and a qualitative study.在随机对照试验中使用数字工具进行招募和保留:对英国临床试验单位的调查和定性研究。
Trials. 2020 Apr 3;21(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04234-0.
7
General Practice and Digital Methods to Recruit Stroke Survivors to a Clinical Mobility Study: Comparative Analysis.全科医学与数字方法招募中风幸存者参与临床移动性研究:比较分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 13;23(10):e28923. doi: 10.2196/28923.
8
Building a Digital Health Research Platform to Enable Recruitment, Enrollment, Data Collection, and Follow-Up for a Highly Diverse Longitudinal US Cohort of 1 Million People in the All of Us Research Program: Design and Implementation Study.构建一个数字健康研究平台,以实现美国“我们所有人”研究计划中100万高度多样化纵向队列的招募、入组、数据收集和随访:设计与实施研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 15;27:e60189. doi: 10.2196/60189.
9
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
Research Participants' Engagement and Retention in Digital Health Interventions Research: Protocol for Mixed Methods Systematic Review.数字健康干预研究中研究参与者的参与度与留存率:混合方法系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jan 3;14:e65099. doi: 10.2196/65099.

本文引用的文献

1
The Digital Platform and Its Emerging Role in Decentralized Clinical Trials.数字平台及其在去中心化临床试验中的新兴作用。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 3;26:e47882. doi: 10.2196/47882.
2
Optimizing Clinical Trial Eligibility Design Using Natural Language Processing Models and Real-World Data: Algorithm Development and Validation.使用自然语言处理模型和真实世界数据优化临床试验资格设计:算法开发与验证
JMIR AI. 2024 Jul 29;3:e50800. doi: 10.2196/50800.
3
Enhancing site selection strategies in clinical trial recruitment using real-world data modeling.
利用真实世界数据建模优化临床试验招募中的选址策略。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 11;19(3):e0300109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300109. eCollection 2024.
4
Artificial Intelligence in Pharmaceutical Technology and Drug Delivery Design.制药技术与药物递送设计中的人工智能
Pharmaceutics. 2023 Jul 10;15(7):1916. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15071916.
5
Applying Systems Thinking to Inform Decentralized Clinical Trial Planning and Deployment.应用系统思维指导去中心化临床试验规划和部署。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023 Sep;57(5):1081-1098. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00540-2. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
6
Artificial Intelligence Applied to clinical trials: opportunities and challenges.人工智能应用于临床试验:机遇与挑战。
Health Technol (Berl). 2023;13(2):203-213. doi: 10.1007/s12553-023-00738-2. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
7
Digitally enabled decentralised research: opportunities to improve the efficiency of clinical trials and observational studies.数字化赋能的去中心化研究:提高临床试验和观察性研究效率的机遇
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023 Oct;28(5):328-331. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112253. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
8
Patient-Centric Product Development: A Summary of Select Regulatory CMC and Device Considerations.以患者为中心的产品开发:选定的法规 CMC 及器械考量总结
J Pharm Sci. 2023 Apr;112(4):922-936. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2023.01.029. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
9
Electronic Consent at US Cancer Centers: A Survey of Practices, Challenges, and Opportunities.美国癌症中心的电子知情同意书:实践、挑战和机遇的调查。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2023 Jan;7:e2200122. doi: 10.1200/CCI.22.00122.
10
Assessing the Financial Value of Decentralized Clinical Trials.评估去中心化临床试验的财务价值。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023 Mar;57(2):209-219. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00454-5. Epub 2022 Sep 14.