Kozisek Frantisek, Dvorakova Darina, Kotal Filip, Jeligova Hana, Mayerova Lenka, Svobodova Veronika, Jurikova Martina, Gomersall Veronika, Pulkrabova Jana
National Institute of Public Health (NIPH), Department of Water Hygiene, Srobarova 49/48, Prague, 100 00, Czech Republic.
University of Chemistry and Technology (UCT), Prague, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, Department of Food Analysis and Nutrition, Technicka 5, 166 28, Prague, Czech Republic.
Chemosphere. 2025 Feb;370:143969. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143969. Epub 2024 Dec 26.
This study investigates the presence of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the drinking water supplies in the Czech Republic using a risk-based monitoring approach. Tap water samples (n = 27) from sources close to areas potentially contaminated with PFAS were analysed. A total of 28 PFAS were measured using ultra-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry after solid phase extraction. Total PFAS concentrations (∑PFAS) varied from undetectable to 90.8 ng/L, with perfluoropentanoic acid (PFPeA), perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA), perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA) and perfluorobutane sulfonic acid (PFBS) being the most abundant, detected in over 70% of samples. Risk-based monitoring in drinking water showed that commercial wells had higher PFAS levels compared to tap water, particularly C4-C9 perfluorocarboxylic acids (PFCAs), possibly due to proximity to industrial areas. However, the hypothesis that risk-based monitoring is more effective than random monitoring was not confirmed, possibly because specific sources did not produce the target PFAS or because of the wide range and less obvious sources of potential contamination. The study also assessed exposure risks and compliance with regulatory thresholds. Weekly intake estimates for adults and children indicated that regular consumption of most contaminated water sample would exceed the tolerable weekly intake. Compared to EU regulations, none of the tap water samples exceeded the 'Sum of PFAS' parametric value of 100 ng/L, though one sample approached this limit. In addition, surface water samples from the Jizera River (n = 21) showed a wider range of PFAS, with C7-C10 PFCAs, PFBS, and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) in every sample, with higher PFOS concentrations at a median of 2.56 ng/L. ∑PFAS concentrations increased downstream, rising from 1.08 ng/L near the spring to 26 ng/L downstream. This comprehensive analysis highlights the need for detailed/areal monitoring to also address hidden or non-obvious sources of PFAS contamination.
本研究采用基于风险的监测方法,调查捷克共和国饮用水供应中全氟烷基物质(PFAS)的存在情况。分析了来自可能受PFAS污染地区附近水源的自来水样本(n = 27)。在固相萃取后,使用超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定了总共28种PFAS。总PFAS浓度(∑PFAS)从未检出到90.8 ng/L不等,其中全氟戊酸(PFPeA)、全氟己酸(PFHxA)、全氟庚酸(PFHpA)和全氟丁烷磺酸(PFBS)含量最高,在超过70%的样本中被检测到。饮用水的基于风险的监测表明,商业水井中的PFAS水平高于自来水,尤其是C4 - C9全氟羧酸(PFCA),这可能是由于靠近工业区。然而,基于风险的监测比随机监测更有效的假设未得到证实,可能是因为特定来源未产生目标PFAS,或者是因为潜在污染的范围广泛且来源不明显。该研究还评估了暴露风险和是否符合监管阈值。成人和儿童的每周摄入量估计表明,经常饮用污染最严重的水样将超过可耐受的每周摄入量。与欧盟法规相比,虽然有一个样本接近该限值,但没有一个自来水样本超过100 ng/L的“PFAS总和”参数值。此外,伊泽拉河的地表水样本(n = 21)显示出更广泛的PFAS范围,每个样本中都含有C7 - C10 PFCA、PFBS和全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS),PFOS浓度中位数较高,为2.56 ng/L。∑PFAS浓度在下游增加,从源头附近的1.08 ng/L上升到下游的26 ng/L。这项全面分析凸显了进行详细/区域监测以解决PFAS污染隐藏或不明显来源的必要性。