Kumpasoğlu Güler Beril, Saunders Rob, Campbell Chloe, Nolte Tobias, Montague Read, Pilling Steve, Leibowitz Judy, Fonagy Peter
Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
J Affect Disord. 2025 Mar 1;372:502-511. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.12.050. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
Emotion regulation is a crucial function implicated in multiple mental health disorders; understanding the mechanisms by which emotion regulation has such impact is essential. Mentalizing has been posited as a prerequisite for effective emotion regulation. The current study aims to examine the roles of epistemic trust and interpersonal problems in driving the association between mentalizing and emotion regulation, contrasting clinical and non-clinical populations.
A total of 652 individuals (296 clinical and 356 community control) were employed. Sequential mediation analysis was used to examine the role of epistemic stances and interpersonal problems in the mentalizing-emotion regulation link, and moderated mediation analysis was conducted to identify group differences in these pathways.
Ineffective mentalizing was associated with emotion dysregulation and interpersonal problems. Higher levels of epistemic credulity and mistrust were associated with ineffective mentalizing, interpersonal problems, and emotion dysregulation. Sequential mediation analysis indicated that disruptions in epistemic trust (epistemic mistrust and credulity) and interpersonal problems partially mediated the relationship between inadequate mentalizing and emotion dysregulation, with these pathways being consistent across both clinical and control groups. The pathways including epistemic trust were not significant.
The study's limitations include a simplified theoretical model, a cross-sectional design preventing causal inference, and sample recruitment methods possibly limiting generalizability.
These findings suggest a potential mechanism connecting mentalizing, disruptions in epistemic trust, interpersonal problems, and emotion regulation, to illuminate a crucial aspect of psychological functioning. These results emphasize the significance of social-communicative aspect in clinical outcomes.
情绪调节是一项与多种精神健康障碍相关的关键功能;了解情绪调节产生这种影响的机制至关重要。心理化被认为是有效情绪调节的前提条件。本研究旨在探讨认知信任和人际问题在推动心理化与情绪调节之间的关联中所起的作用,对比临床人群和非临床人群。
共纳入652名个体(296名临床患者和356名社区对照者)。采用序列中介分析来检验认知立场和人际问题在心理化 - 情绪调节联系中的作用,并进行调节中介分析以确定这些路径中的组间差异。
无效的心理化与情绪失调和人际问题相关。较高水平的认知轻信和不信任与无效的心理化、人际问题和情绪失调相关。序列中介分析表明,认知信任的破坏(认知不信任和轻信)和人际问题部分介导了心理化不足与情绪失调之间的关系,且这些路径在临床组和对照组中均一致。包括认知信任的路径不显著。
该研究的局限性包括理论模型简化、横断面设计妨碍因果推断以及样本招募方法可能限制可推广性。
这些发现揭示了一种连接心理化、认知信任破坏、人际问题和情绪调节的潜在机制,以阐明心理功能的一个关键方面。这些结果强调了社会交往方面在临床结果中的重要性。