Wang Yunxin, Xu Ping, Lu Ning, Li Wenjin, Xu Shisen
Faculty of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming Yunnan, 650504, P. R. China.
Department of Orthopedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming Yunnan, 650101, P. R. China.
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Dec 15;38(12):1466-1473. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202408048.
To establish a finite element model of the knee joint based on coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) typing method, and analyze the biomechanical characteristics of different types of knee joints.
The finite element models of the knee joint were established based on CT scan data of 6 healthy volunteers. There were 5 males and 1 female with an average age of 24.2 years (range, 23-25 years). There were 3 left knees and 3 right knees. According to the CPAK typing method, the knees were rated as types Ⅰ to Ⅵ. Under the same material properties, boundary conditions, and axial loading, biomechanical simulations were performed on the finite element model of the knee joint. Based on the Von Mises stress nephogram and displacement nephogram, the peak stresses of the meniscus, femoral cartilage, and tibial cartilage, and the displacement of the meniscus were compared among different types of knee joints.
The constructed finite element model of the knee joint was verified to be effective, and the stress and displacement results were consistent with previous literature. Under the axial load of 1 000 N, the stress nephogram showed that the stress distribution of the medial and lateral meniscus and tibial cartilage of CPAK type Ⅲ knee joint was the most uneven. The peak stresses of the lateral meniscus and tibial cartilage were 9.969 6 MPa and 2.602 7 MPa, which were 173% and 165% of the medial side, respectively. The difference of peak stress between the medial and lateral femoral cartilage was the largest in type Ⅳ knee joint, and the medial was 221% of the lateral. The displacement nephogram showed that the displacement of the medial meniscus was greater than that of the lateral meniscus except for types Ⅲ and Ⅵ knee joints. The difference between medial and lateral meniscus displacement of type Ⅲ knee joint was the largest, the lateral was 170% of the medial.
In the same type of joint line obliquity (JLO), the medial and lateral stress distribution of the knee was more uniform in varus and neutral positions than in valgus position. At the same time, the distal vertex of JLO subgroup can help to reduce the uneven medial and lateral stress distribution of varus knee, but increase the uneven distribution of valgus knee.
基于膝关节冠状面排列(CPAK)分型方法建立膝关节有限元模型,并分析不同类型膝关节的生物力学特性。
基于6名健康志愿者的CT扫描数据建立膝关节有限元模型。其中男性5名,女性1名,平均年龄24.2岁(范围23 - 25岁)。左膝3个,右膝3个。根据CPAK分型方法,将膝关节分为Ⅰ至Ⅵ型。在相同材料属性、边界条件和轴向载荷下,对膝关节有限元模型进行生物力学模拟。基于冯·米塞斯应力云图和位移云图,比较不同类型膝关节半月板、股骨软骨和胫骨软骨的峰值应力以及半月板的位移。
构建的膝关节有限元模型经验证有效,应力和位移结果与既往文献一致。在1000 N轴向载荷下,应力云图显示CPAKⅢ型膝关节内外侧半月板及胫骨软骨应力分布最不均匀。外侧半月板和胫骨软骨的峰值应力分别为9.969 6 MPa和2.602 7 MPa,分别是内侧的173%和165%。Ⅳ型膝关节股骨内外侧软骨峰值应力差值最大,内侧是外侧的221%。位移云图显示,除Ⅲ型和Ⅵ型膝关节外,内侧半月板位移大于外侧半月板。Ⅲ型膝关节内外侧半月板位移差值最大,外侧是内侧的170%。
在相同类型的关节线倾斜度(JLO)下,膝关节内翻和中立位时内外侧应力分布比外翻位更均匀。同时,JLO亚组的远端顶点有助于减少内翻膝关节内外侧应力分布不均,但会增加外翻膝关节的不均匀分布。