Zhang Cong, Ju Qianqian, Gan Yiqun
School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Int J Behav Med. 2024 Dec 18. doi: 10.1007/s12529-024-10342-x.
Previous studies have investigated the encouragement of healthy behaviors through both conscious manipulation and unconscious priming. However, direct comparisons between these two approaches are limited, resulting in interventions that may lack precision. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of conscious and unconscious priming on the intention to engage in physical activity, with the goal of identifying and applying the most effective method as a targeted intervention to bridge the gap between intention and actual physical activity.
In study 1, 116 participants were screened in a 2 × 2 (conscious vs. unconscious) × (prime vs. control) online experiment to examine the influence of implementation intention manipulation and goal priming on physical activity. Building on these results, study 2 employed a randomized controlled trial with 127 participants to assess the effects of conscious mental simulation interventions on physical activity behavior.
Study 1 showed that both conscious manipulation (p = .046) and unconscious priming (p = .004) significantly increased the choice of sports activities, with conscious manipulation being more effective. Study 2 found significant impacts of mixed simulation on activity levels immediately and one-week post-intervention (p = .001), with day-after intervention effects notable in the simulation group.
This study explored the causal relationship between priming process physical activity, and found out the promotion effect of conscious mental simulation intervention on physical activity.
以往的研究通过有意识的操控和无意识的启动来探讨对健康行为的激励。然而,这两种方法之间的直接比较有限,导致干预措施可能缺乏精准性。本研究旨在评估有意识和无意识启动对参与体育活动意愿的影响,目标是识别并应用最有效的方法作为针对性干预措施,以弥合意愿与实际体育活动之间的差距。
在研究1中,116名参与者在一项2×2(有意识与无意识)×(启动与对照)的在线实验中接受筛选,以检验实施意图操控和目标启动对体育活动的影响。基于这些结果,研究2采用了一项有127名参与者的随机对照试验,以评估有意识心理模拟干预对体育活动行为的影响。
研究1表明,有意识操控(p = .046)和无意识启动(p = .004)均显著增加了体育活动的选择,其中有意识操控更有效。研究2发现,混合模拟在干预后即刻和干预后一周对活动水平有显著影响(p = .001),在模拟组中干预后次日的效果显著。
本研究探讨了启动过程与体育活动之间的因果关系,并发现了有意识心理模拟干预对体育活动的促进作用。