Case Western Reserve University, United States.
University of California at Santa Barbara & IZA & NBER, United States.
J Health Econ. 2018 Nov;62:95-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
Recent large-scale randomized experiments find that helping people form implementation intentions by asking when and where they plan to act increases one-time actions, such as vaccinations, preventative screenings and voting. We investigate the effect of a simple scalable planning intervention on a repeated behavior using a randomized design involving 877 subjects at a private gym. Subjects were randomized into i) a treatment group who selected the days and times they intended to attend the gym over the next two weeks or ii) a control group who instead recorded their days of exercise in the prior two weeks. In contrast to recent studies, we find that the planning intervention did not have a positive effect on behavior. We observe a tightly estimated null effect even though the majority of subjects believed that planning is helpful and despite clear evidence that they engaged with the planning process.
最近的大规模随机实验发现,通过询问人们计划何时何地行动来帮助他们制定实施意图,可以增加一次性行动,如接种疫苗、预防性筛查和投票。我们使用一项涉及私人健身房 877 名参与者的随机设计,研究了一种简单的可扩展计划干预对重复行为的影响。参与者被随机分为 i)治疗组,他们选择未来两周内打算去健身房的日期和时间,或 ii)对照组,他们记录前两周的锻炼日期。与最近的研究不同,我们发现该计划干预对行为没有积极影响。我们观察到一个严格估计的零效应,尽管大多数参与者认为计划是有帮助的,尽管有明显的证据表明他们参与了计划过程。