Lorente-Leal V, Gomez-Buendia A, Gutiérrez-Tobaruela A, de Juan L, Bezos J, Romero B
Centro de Vigilancia Sanitaria Veterinaria (VISAVET), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Departamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
BMC Vet Res. 2024 Dec 19;20(1):568. doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-04427-8.
The growing use of real-time PCR (qPCR) as a diagnostic method for bovine TB (bTB) requires rapid and effective DNA extraction methods, which are crucial for its success. Automated DNA extraction methods based on magnetic beads are a promising alternative to conventional silica column-based protocols (COL protocol) due to their high throughput capacity and reduced hands-on time. This study aimed to assess the performance of the MagMax CORE Nucleic Acid Purification kit and the KingFisher Flex instrument (KF protocol) as an alternative for scaling up the use of qPCR in bTB diagnosis.
Performance was evaluated with two different real-time PCR (qPCR) protocols, based on the IS6110 element and the QuantiFast and VetMAX™ (QF and VM protocols) kits, on 145 frozen tissue homogenates confirmed as either bTB-positive or negative through a composite reference standard based on microbiological culture, column-based extraction, and qPCR, as well as on negative tissue samples spiked with 10 to 10 CFU/ml of M. bovis BCG.
The performance of both qPCR protocols was very high on samples extracted using the KF protocol, with positive percent agreement (PPA) values of 89.04% [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 79.54-95.15%] and 93.15% [95% CI: 84.74-97.74%] for the QF and VM protocols, respectively, and negative percent agreement (NPA) values of 100% [95% CI: 95.01-100.00%]. A higher variability was identified in samples analysed with the same qPCR protocol but different extraction methods. Higher Ct values were identified for samples extracted using the KF protocol in both routine and spiked samples, likely due to using the same amount of starting material for both extraction methods, which was lower than recommended by the manufacturer for the KF protocol.
The results of this study indicate that the MagMAX CORE Nucleic Acid Purification kit coupled with a KingFisher Flex instrument is a valuable alternative for the extraction of MTBC DNA from bovine tissues. However, the increased variability and Ct values suggest that a larger amount of starting material is recommended for this methodology, warranting further studies.
实时荧光定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)作为牛结核病(bTB)的诊断方法,其应用日益广泛,这就需要快速有效的DNA提取方法,这对其成功至关重要。基于磁珠的自动化DNA提取方法因其高通量能力和减少的操作时间,是传统基于硅胶柱的方法(COL方法)的一个有前景的替代方案。本研究旨在评估MagMax CORE核酸纯化试剂盒和KingFisher Flex仪器(KF方法)作为扩大qPCR在bTB诊断中应用的替代方法的性能。
基于IS6110元件以及QuantiFast和VetMAX™(QF和VM方法)试剂盒,使用两种不同的实时荧光定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)方法,对145份冷冻组织匀浆进行性能评估。这些匀浆通过基于微生物培养、柱式提取和qPCR的综合参考标准被确认为bTB阳性或阴性,同时也对添加了10至10 CFU/ml卡介苗的阴性组织样本进行了评估。
对于使用KF方法提取的样本,两种qPCR方法的性能都非常高,QF方法的阳性百分一致率(PPA)值为89.04%[95%置信区间(CI):79.54 - 95.15%],VM方法的阳性百分一致率为93.15%[95% CI:84.74 - 97.74%],阴性百分一致率(NPA)值均为100%[95% CI:95.01 - 100.00%]。在用相同的qPCR方法但不同提取方法分析的样本中发现了更高的变异性。在常规样本和加标样本中,使用KF方法提取的样本的Ct值更高,这可能是因为两种提取方法使用的起始材料量相同,而该量低于制造商为KF方法推荐的量。
本研究结果表明,MagMAX CORE核酸纯化试剂盒与KingFisher Flex仪器相结合,是从牛组织中提取结核分枝杆菌复合群(MTBC)DNA的一种有价值的替代方法。然而,变异性和Ct值的增加表明,该方法建议使用更多的起始材料,这值得进一步研究。