Suppr超能文献

eMAG™与NucliSENS EasyMAG在临床标本上的性能比较。

Comparison of eMAG™ versus NucliSENS EasyMAG performance on clinical specimens.

作者信息

Garcia Magali, Chessa Céline, Bourgoin Anne, Giraudeau Geneviève, Plouzeau Chloé, Agius Gérard, Lévêque Nicolas, Beby-Defaux Agnès

机构信息

Laboratoire de Virologie et de Mycobactériologie, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France; EA4331-LITEC, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.

Laboratoire de Virologie et de Mycobactériologie, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.

出版信息

J Clin Virol. 2017 Mar;88:52-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 Jan 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

eMAG™ (bioMerieux) is a new nucleic acid extraction platform based on magnetic silica technology, like its predecessor, NucliSENS easyMAG (bioMerieux). Using the same reagents and disposables, eMAG™ adds further automation, allowing simultaneous extraction of 48 samples directly from primary tubes, and distribution of nucleic acid extracts on PCR strips or in tubes at the end of the extraction process.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the performance of eMAG™ and easyMAG on various clinical specimens.

STUDY DESIGN

Respiratory (n=199), whole blood (n=50), plasma (n=25) and urine (n=25) specimens were extracted in parallel on both platforms. Both qualitative (respiratory virus, cell control, CMV, EBV, HHV6 and BKV detection) and quantitative (respiratory virus and cell control cycle thresolds, and CMV, EBV, HHV6 and BKV viral loads) results were compared.

RESULTS

Detection of qualitative targets showed good agreement, ranging from 84.6% for whole blood to 95.9% for respiratory specimens. Correlations between quantitative results were good, with R ranging from 0.802 to 0.995. Quantitative results showed average overall differences below 0.10 log copies/mL between eMAG™ and easyMAG.

CONCLUSIONS

The two platforms showed comparable performance on the types of clinical specimen tested. With higher automation and throughput than easyMAG, the eMAG™ platform is likely to be advantageous for laboratories performing a large number of molecular analyses.

摘要

背景

eMAG™(生物梅里埃公司)是一种基于磁性硅胶技术的新型核酸提取平台,与其前身NucliSENS easyMAG(生物梅里埃公司)类似。使用相同的试剂和一次性耗材,eMAG™进一步提高了自动化程度,可直接从原始试管中同时提取48个样本,并在提取过程结束时将核酸提取物分配到PCR条带上或试管中。

目的

比较eMAG™和easyMAG在各种临床标本上的性能。

研究设计

在两个平台上并行提取呼吸道标本(n = 199)、全血标本(n = 50)、血浆标本(n = 25)和尿液标本(n = 25)。比较定性结果(呼吸道病毒、细胞对照、巨细胞病毒、EB病毒、HHV6和BK病毒检测)和定量结果(呼吸道病毒和细胞对照的循环阈值,以及巨细胞病毒、EB病毒、HHV6和BK病毒载量)。

结果

定性指标检测显示一致性良好,全血标本的一致性为84.6%,呼吸道标本为95.9%。定量结果之间的相关性良好,R值范围为0.802至0.995。定量结果显示,eMAG™和easyMAG之间的平均总体差异低于0.10 log拷贝/mL。

结论

在测试的临床标本类型上,这两个平台表现出相当的性能。eMAG™平台具有比easyMAG更高的自动化程度和通量,对于进行大量分子分析的实验室可能具有优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2f3/7185493/46c6f35868cd/gr1_lrg.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验