Pantoja-Ruiz Camila, Akinyemi Rufus, Lucumi-Cuesta Diego I, Youkee Daniel, Emmett Eva, Soley-Bori Marina, Kalansooriya Wasana, Wolfe Charles, Marshall Iain J
School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, United Kingdom (C.P.-R.).
Neuroscience and Ageing Research Unit, Institute for Advanced Medical Research and Training, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria (R.A.).
Stroke. 2025 Mar;56(3):794-805. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.049474. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
The latest research on socioeconomic status (SES) and stroke continues to demonstrate that individuals with low SES are at a higher risk of stroke, receive lower-quality care, and experience poorer outcomes. Despite growing evidence on the impact of SES on stroke, gaps remain in understanding the underlying mechanisms and the influence of SES in different contexts, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. This narrative review builds upon our previous reviews from 2006 to 2015, focusing on studies published since 2015 to update on the influence of SES on stroke. Reports from nationwide or population-based observational studies in the past decade have confirmed that these inequalities persist globally and have provided new evidence on their mechanisms. In high-income countries, inadequate control of cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and dyslipidemia) among lower socioeconomic groups has been found to explain much of the inequality in stroke risk. Exposure to particulate air pollution (both environmental and indoor from solid fuel cooking) synergizes with cardiovascular risk factors, especially hypertension, as major causes in low- and middle-income countries. Lower SES is persistently associated with disparities in care and increased poststroke disability and mortality. Lower SES also exacerbates other causes of health inequality among women, ethnic minorities, and migrants. Addressing stroke inequalities requires an interdisciplinary approach. Targeting cardiovascular risk factors, providing equitable quality of acute and rehabilitative stroke care, enacting legislative measures, and implementing societal changes remain leading global priorities.
关于社会经济地位(SES)与中风的最新研究不断表明,社会经济地位较低的个体中风风险更高,接受的治疗质量较低,且预后较差。尽管有越来越多的证据表明社会经济地位对中风有影响,但在理解其潜在机制以及社会经济地位在不同背景下的影响方面,仍存在差距,尤其是在低收入和中等收入国家。本叙述性综述基于我们2006年至2015年的以往综述,重点关注2015年以来发表的研究,以更新社会经济地位对中风的影响。过去十年来自全国性或基于人群的观察性研究报告证实,这些不平等在全球范围内持续存在,并提供了关于其机制的新证据。在高收入国家,已发现社会经济地位较低群体对心血管危险因素(高血压、糖尿病、肥胖和血脂异常)控制不足,这在很大程度上解释了中风风险的不平等。暴露于颗粒物空气污染(环境空气污染以及固体燃料烹饪产生的室内空气污染)与心血管危险因素相互作用,尤其是高血压,是低收入和中等收入国家中风的主要原因。社会经济地位较低一直与医疗差异以及中风后残疾和死亡率增加相关。社会经济地位较低还加剧了妇女、少数族裔和移民等群体中其他健康不平等的原因。解决中风不平等问题需要跨学科方法。针对心血管危险因素、提供公平的急性和康复中风护理质量、制定立法措施以及实施社会变革仍然是全球主要优先事项。