Watts Dana, Lebel Catherine, Chaput Kathleen, Giesbrecht Gerald F, Dewsnap Kyle, Baglot Samantha L, Tomfohr-Madsen Lianne
University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
JAACAP Open. 2024 May 24;2(4):250-262. doi: 10.1016/j.jaacop.2024.03.004. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Conflicting results have arisen regarding the association between prenatal cannabis exposure and risk of parent-reported developmental delay in infancy. In certain instances, this literature has become outdated or failed to adjust for confounding variables. The current study aimed to determine if prenatal cannabis exposure was associated with a greater likelihood of risk of parent-reported developmental delay at 12 months of age in a contemporary cohort, while adjusting for common confounding variables.
Participants (n = 10,695) were part of the Pregnancy During the COVID-19 Pandemic (PdP) study. A subset of the sample (n = 3,742) provided a parent-report developmental assessment, the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, Third Edition (ASQ-3), of their infant at 12 months old. Sociodemographic differences between participants who reported cannabis use (CU+ group) and those who did not (CU- group) were analyzed. To address potential heterogeneity between CU+ and CU- groups, propensity score weighting was used. G-computations were performed to analyze the association between outcome variables (gestational age, birth weight, and risk of parent-reported developmental delay) and prenatal cannabis exposure. Weighted linear or quasi-binominal logistic regression models were used, with differences of averages and odds ratios reported.
Participants in CU+ and CU- groups significantly differed on all sociodemographic variables. Prenatal cannabis exposure was not associated with any birth outcomes (s > .05). Prenatal cannabis exposure was significantly associated with risk of parent-reported developmental delay on the communication domain ( = .02). This finding was not significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons. No additional domains were significantly associated (s > .05).
Prenatal cannabis exposure was associated with increased odds of delay on the communication domain before adjusting for multiple comparisons. No other domains were significantly associated with increased odds of delay. These findings should not be interpreted as suggesting that consuming cannabis products during pregnancy is safe for infant development. Further, the analysis was performed using data from a longitudinal sample that was not specifically created to address this question, but was leveraged to explore these outcomes. Additional studies that are specifically designed to examine these outcomes are needed.
DIVERSITY & INCLUSION STATEMENT: We worked to ensure that the study questionnaires were prepared in an inclusive way. We worked to ensure race, ethnic, and/or other types of diversity in the recruitment of human participants. The author list of this paper includes contributors from the location and/or community where the research was conducted who participated in the data collection, design, analysis, and/or interpretation of the work. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented sexual and/or gender groups in science.
关于产前大麻暴露与父母报告的婴儿发育迟缓风险之间的关联,已出现相互矛盾的结果。在某些情况下,该文献已过时或未对混杂变量进行调整。本研究旨在确定在当代队列中,产前大麻暴露是否与12个月大时父母报告的发育迟缓风险增加相关,同时对常见的混杂变量进行调整。
参与者(n = 10695)是“新冠疫情期间的妊娠(PdP)”研究的一部分。样本的一个子集(n = 3742)提供了其12个月大婴儿的父母报告发育评估,即《年龄与发育阶段问卷》第三版(ASQ - 3)。分析了报告使用大麻的参与者(大麻使用组)和未使用大麻的参与者(非大麻使用组)之间的社会人口统计学差异。为解决大麻使用组和非大麻使用组之间潜在的异质性,采用了倾向得分加权法。进行G计算以分析结果变量(胎龄、出生体重和父母报告的发育迟缓风险)与产前大麻暴露之间的关联。使用加权线性或准二项逻辑回归模型,并报告平均值差异和比值比。
大麻使用组和非大麻使用组的参与者在所有社会人口统计学变量上均存在显著差异。产前大麻暴露与任何出生结局均无关联(p > .05)。产前大麻暴露与父母报告的沟通领域发育迟缓风险显著相关(p = .02)。在进行多重比较调整后,这一发现不再显著。没有其他领域存在显著关联(p > .05)。
在进行多重比较调整之前,产前大麻暴露与沟通领域发育迟缓几率增加相关。没有其他领域与发育迟缓几率增加显著相关。这些发现不应被解释为表明孕期使用大麻产品对婴儿发育是安全的。此外,该分析是使用纵向样本的数据进行的,该样本并非专门为解决这个问题而创建,而是被用于探索这些结果。需要专门设计用于检验这些结果的更多研究。
我们努力确保研究问卷的编制具有包容性。我们努力确保在招募人类参与者时体现种族、民族和/或其他类型的多样性。本文的作者名单包括研究开展地点和/或社区的贡献者,他们参与了数据收集、设计、分析和/或对工作的解释。本文的一位或多位作者自我认定为科学领域中一个或多个历史上代表性不足的性和/或性别群体的成员。