Khorasanchi Adam, Goodstein Taylor, Dason Shawn, Singer Eric A, Zimmerman Danielle, Yang Yuanquan
Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Division of Urologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Transl Cancer Res. 2024 Nov 30;13(11):6511-6528. doi: 10.21037/tcr-24-16. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
For patients with resectable renal cell carcinoma (RCC), extirpative surgery with curative intent remains the standard of care. Despite surgical resection, most patients with high-risk features experience disease recurrence. The role of perioperative systemic therapy in the management of these patients' disease remains unclear. Several studies have evaluated the efficacy and safety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs); however, most trials have yielded negative results. Adjuvant pembrolizumab demonstrated a disease-free survival benefit in the KEYNOTE-564 trial; however, multiple studies of other immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in a similar patient population did not yield consistent results. This review summarizes the current evidence for perioperative systemic therapy studies in RCC.
The PubMed, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and clinicaltrials.gov databases were used to retrieve articles published from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2023 using the following search terms: "adjuvant", "neoadjuvant", "perioperative", "VEGF inhibitors", "immune checkpoint inhibitors", and "renal cell carcinoma". The search was limited to articles published in English.
We summarize the major perioperative systemic therapy studies in RCC patients and provide an analysis of study outcomes, comparing differences in trial design and patient selection. We also discuss ongoing trials and the emergence of novel biomarkers designed to improve patient selection.
The optimal use of perioperative systemic therapy in high-risk RCC is an area of active investigation. The use of adjuvant TKIs failed to demonstrate a survival benefit and was limited by high rates of toxicity. Several neoadjuvant and adjuvant ICI-based combination studies are being carried out to further improve clinical outcomes. Further studies will be needed to identify effective biomarkers to improve patient selection while avoiding overtreatment.
对于可切除的肾细胞癌(RCC)患者,以治愈为目的的根治性手术仍是标准治疗方法。尽管进行了手术切除,但大多数具有高危特征的患者仍会出现疾病复发。围手术期全身治疗在这些患者疾病管理中的作用仍不明确。多项研究评估了酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)的疗效和安全性;然而,大多数试验结果为阴性。辅助性帕博利珠单抗在KEYNOTE-564试验中显示出无病生存获益;然而,在类似患者群体中对其他免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的多项研究并未得出一致结果。本综述总结了目前关于RCC围手术期全身治疗研究的证据。
使用PubMed、美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)和clinicaltrials.gov数据库,通过以下检索词检索2001年1月1日至2023年12月31日发表的文章:“辅助”、“新辅助”、“围手术期”、“VEGF抑制剂”、“免疫检查点抑制剂”和“肾细胞癌”。检索仅限于英文发表的文章。
我们总结了RCC患者围手术期主要的全身治疗研究,并对研究结果进行分析,比较试验设计和患者选择的差异。我们还讨论了正在进行的试验以及旨在改善患者选择的新型生物标志物的出现。
高危RCC围手术期全身治疗的最佳应用是一个正在积极研究的领域。辅助性TKIs的使用未能证明生存获益,且受高毒性发生率的限制。正在开展多项基于新辅助和辅助ICI的联合研究,以进一步改善临床结局。需要进一步研究以确定有效的生物标志物,在避免过度治疗的同时改善患者选择。