• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较两个大型数据库,以了解不同人群在人口统计学、健康史和行为特征方面的差异。

Comparing two large data repositories to understand the differences in demographics, health history, and behavioral attributes in populations.

作者信息

Nasiha Maliq Nihmath, Ong Toan, Giano Zachary, Rivera William, Tiwari Tamanna

机构信息

School of Dental Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States.

School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States.

出版信息

Front Oral Health. 2024 Dec 4;5:1427109. doi: 10.3389/froh.2024.1427109. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/froh.2024.1427109
PMID:39697788
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11653124/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study conducted a comparative analysis between two large data repositories, the All of Us (AoU) medical data and BigMouth dental data repositories.

METHODS

The comparison analysis includes variables related to behavioral and systemic health, health literacy, and overall health status across race, ethnicity, and gender. The analytic approach used descriptive statistics, Chi-square, odds ratio, and 95% confidence intervals; significant comparisons were measured with Cohen's D effect sizes.

RESULTS

In the AoU dataset, 80.6% of Hispanic or Latino participants reported alcohol use compared to 16.8% in the BigMouth data repository. The female cohort in AoU showed 87.9% alcohol use, a contrast to BigMouth's 26.0%. Additionally, the diabetes prevalence among females was 8.8% in AoU vs. 21.6% in BigMouth. Differences in health literacy were observed, with 49.2% among Hispanic or Latino participants in AoU, in contrast to BigMouth's 3.2%. Despite this, 70.1% of Hispanic or Latino respondents in AoU reported satisfactory health status, while BigMouth indicated a much higher figure at 98.3%.

DISCUSSION

These variations highlight the importance of targeted health interventions addressing racial/ethnic and gender influences. Differences may arise from recruitment approaches, participant demographics, and healthcare access. There is a need for collaboration, standardized data collection, and inclusive recruitment to remedy these discrepancies. Further research is imperative to understand the underlying causes, facilitate interventions that address the disparities, and advocate for a more inclusive healthcare system.

摘要

引言

本研究对两个大型数据存储库——“我们所有人”(AoU)医学数据存储库和大嘴牙科数据存储库进行了比较分析。

方法

比较分析包括与行为和全身健康、健康素养以及不同种族、族裔和性别的总体健康状况相关的变量。分析方法采用描述性统计、卡方检验、比值比和95%置信区间;显著差异用科恩D效应量来衡量。

结果

在AoU数据集中,80.6%的西班牙裔或拉丁裔参与者报告有饮酒行为,而在大嘴数据存储库中这一比例为16.8%。AoU中的女性队列有87.9%的人饮酒,与大嘴数据存储库中的26.0%形成对比。此外,AoU中女性的糖尿病患病率为8.8%,而大嘴数据存储库中为21.6%。观察到健康素养方面的差异,AoU中西班牙裔或拉丁裔参与者的这一比例为49.2%,而大嘴数据存储库中为3.2%。尽管如此,AoU中70.1%的西班牙裔或拉丁裔受访者报告健康状况良好,而大嘴数据存储库中的这一比例要高得多,为98.3%。

讨论

这些差异凸显了针对种族/族裔和性别影响进行有针对性的健康干预的重要性。差异可能源于招募方式、参与者人口统计学特征和医疗保健可及性。需要开展合作、进行标准化数据收集和包容性招募来弥补这些差异。必须进行进一步研究以了解潜在原因,推动解决差异的干预措施,并倡导建立一个更具包容性的医疗保健系统。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7946/11653124/9c0b0e7d4de0/froh-05-1427109-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7946/11653124/2ba6da50fb90/froh-05-1427109-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7946/11653124/40a2cba70f3b/froh-05-1427109-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7946/11653124/9c0b0e7d4de0/froh-05-1427109-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7946/11653124/2ba6da50fb90/froh-05-1427109-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7946/11653124/40a2cba70f3b/froh-05-1427109-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7946/11653124/9c0b0e7d4de0/froh-05-1427109-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing two large data repositories to understand the differences in demographics, health history, and behavioral attributes in populations.比较两个大型数据库,以了解不同人群在人口统计学、健康史和行为特征方面的差异。
Front Oral Health. 2024 Dec 4;5:1427109. doi: 10.3389/froh.2024.1427109. eCollection 2024.
2
Representation of Race and Ethnicity in the Contemporary US Health Cohort All of Us Research Program.当代美国健康队列研究计划中种族和民族的代表性。
JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Sep 1;8(9):859-864. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.2411.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Investigation of hypertension and type 2 diabetes as risk factors for dementia in the All of Us cohort.在 All of Us 队列中研究高血压和 2 型糖尿病作为痴呆的危险因素。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 17;12(1):19797. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23353-z.
5
Evaluating Discrepancies in Self-Reported Glaucoma and Electronic Health Records in the National Institutes of Health All of Us Database.评估美国国立卫生研究院“我们所有人”数据库中自我报告的青光眼与电子健康记录之间的差异。
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2023 Sep-Oct;6(5):521-529. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2023.03.003. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
6
Sociodemographic characteristics differ across routine adult vaccine cohorts: An All of Us descriptive study.不同常规成人疫苗队列的社会人口学特征存在差异:一项“我们所有人”描述性研究。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2023 Mar-Apr;63(2):582-591.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2022.11.005. Epub 2022 Nov 13.
7
The prevalence of major depressive disorder in people with HIV: Results from the All of Us Research Program.感染艾滋病毒人群中重度抑郁症的患病率:来自“我们所有人”研究项目的结果。
HIV Med. 2024 Aug;25(8):998-1004. doi: 10.1111/hiv.13653. Epub 2024 May 7.
8
Burden of liver cancer mortality by county, race, and ethnicity in the USA, 2000-19: a systematic analysis of health disparities.美国 2000-19 年按县、种族和族裔划分的肝癌死亡率负担:健康差距的系统分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2024 Mar;9(3):e186-e198. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00002-1.
9
Racial, ethnic, and gender differences in obesity and body fat distribution: An All of Us Research Program demonstration project.种族、民族和性别差异与肥胖和体脂分布:全美国研究计划示范项目。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 6;16(8):e0255583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255583. eCollection 2021.
10
Cause-specific mortality by county, race, and ethnicity in the USA, 2000-19: a systematic analysis of health disparities.美国 2000-19 年按县、种族和民族划分的特定原因死亡率:健康差距的系统分析。
Lancet. 2023 Sep 23;402(10407):1065-1082. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01088-7. Epub 2023 Aug 3.

本文引用的文献

1
BigMouth: development and maintenance of a successful dental data repository.大嘴:成功的牙科数据存储库的开发和维护。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Mar 15;29(4):701-706. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac001.
2
Health literacy, health perception and related factors among different ethnic groups: a cross-sectional study in southeastern Turkey.不同种族群体的健康素养、健康认知及相关因素:土耳其东南部的一项横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 10;21(1):1109. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11119-7.
3
Association of Access to Healthcare with Self-Assessed Health and Quality of Life among Old Adults with Chronic Disease in China: Urban Versus Rural Populations.
中国慢性病老年患者的医疗保健可及性与自我评估健康和生活质量的关联:城市与农村人群比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 20;16(14):2592. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16142592.
4
The role of medical data in efficient patient care delivery: a review.医学数据在高效患者护理提供中的作用:综述
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2019 Apr 24;12:67-73. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S179259. eCollection 2019.
5
Prevalence of and Trends in Diabetes Among Adults in the United States, 1988-2012.美国成年人糖尿病患病率及趋势(1988 年至 2012 年)。
JAMA. 2015 Sep 8;314(10):1021-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10029.
6
Big data analytics in healthcare: promise and potential.医疗保健中的大数据分析:前景与潜力。
Health Inf Sci Syst. 2014 Feb 7;2:3. doi: 10.1186/2047-2501-2-3. eCollection 2014.
7
Big data and new knowledge in medicine: the thinking, training, and tools needed for a learning health system.医学中的大数据与新知识:学习型健康系统所需的思维、培训及工具
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jul;33(7):1163-70. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0053.
8
Open science and data sharing in clinical research: basing informed decisions on the totality of the evidence.临床研究中的开放科学与数据共享:基于全部证据做出明智决策。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Mar 1;5(2):141-2. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.965848.
9
Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review.低健康素养与健康结局:一项更新的系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 19;155(2):97-107. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005.
10
Race, socioeconomic status, and health: complexities, ongoing challenges, and research opportunities.种族、社会经济地位与健康:复杂性、持续存在的挑战与研究机遇。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Feb;1186:69-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05339.x.