• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Mohs Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.Mohs 重建术的患者报告结局指标:一项系统评价
OTO Open. 2024 Dec 18;8(4):e70054. doi: 10.1002/oto2.70054. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.
2
Patient Reported Outcome Measures Used to Assess Quality of Life in Aortic Dissection: a Systematic Scoping Review using COSMIN Methodology.用于评估主动脉夹层患者生活质量的患者报告结局指标:一项使用COSMIN方法的系统综述。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023 Sep;66(3):343-350. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.06.032. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
3
Evaluating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for bladder cancer: a systematic review using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist.评估膀胱癌患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs):使用共识基础的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)清单进行的系统评价。
BJU Int. 2018 Nov;122(5):760-773. doi: 10.1111/bju.14368. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
4
Development of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Mohs Reconstruction.患者报告的 Mohs 重建结局测量工具的开发。
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2020 Jul/Aug;22(4):274-280. doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0036. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
5
The suitability of patient-reported outcome measures used to assess the impact of hypoglycaemia on quality of life in people with diabetes: a systematic review using COSMIN methods.用于评估低血糖对糖尿病患者生活质量影响的患者报告结局测量工具的适用性:使用 COSMIN 方法的系统评价。
Diabetologia. 2021 Jun;64(6):1213-1225. doi: 10.1007/s00125-021-05382-x. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
6
Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Maternal Postpartum Depression Using the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments Guideline: A Systematic Review.采用基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准评估产妇产后抑郁症患者报告结局测量指标:系统评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2214885. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.14885.
7
A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures for advanced skin cancer patients.晚期皮肤癌患者报告结局测量的系统评价。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2023 Aug;315(6):1473-1480. doi: 10.1007/s00403-022-02479-0. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
8
Patient-reported outcome measures for facial skin cancer: a systematic review and evaluation of the quality of their measurement properties.患者报告的面部皮肤癌结局测量指标:系统评价及测量性能质量评估。
Br J Dermatol. 2019 May;180(5):1018-1029. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17342. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
9
HIV-Specific Reported Outcome Measures: Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties.HIV 特异性报告结局指标:心理计量学特性的系统评价。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Dec 8;8(12):e39015. doi: 10.2196/39015.
10
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to assess sexual functioning in prostate cancer patients: a systematic review of psychometric properties.用于评估前列腺癌患者性功能的患者报告结局指标(PROMs):心理测量特性的系统评价
J Sex Med. 2025 Apr 15;22(4):605-624. doi: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdaf018.

引用本文的文献

1
Advantages of Mohs Surgery in the Treatment of NMSC in the Head and Neck District.莫氏手术在头颈部非黑色素瘤皮肤癌治疗中的优势。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 4;14(13):4732. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134732.

本文引用的文献

1
Application of a Modified Perforator Flap of the Transverse Facial Artery for Zygomaticofacial Skin Defect Repair After Tumor Resection.改良颞浅动脉穿支皮瓣在肿瘤切除术后颧面部皮肤缺损修复中的应用
J Craniofac Surg. 2023;34(5):1532-1535. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009230. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
2
Validation of the Turkish Version of the Skin Cancer Quality of Life Impact Tool (SCQOLIT): A Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire for Non-metastatic Melanoma and Non-melanoma Skin Cancer.皮肤癌生活质量影响工具(SCQOLIT)土耳其语版本的验证:一份针对非转移性黑色素瘤和非黑色素瘤皮肤癌的健康相关生活质量问卷。
Dermatol Pract Concept. 2023 Jan 1;13(1):e2023001. doi: 10.5826/dpc.1301a1.
3
Testing some psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Skin Cancer Index: A questionnaire for measuring quality of life in patients with non-melanoma skin cancer.测试意大利语版皮肤癌指数的一些心理测量学特性:一份用于测量非黑色素瘤皮肤癌患者生活质量的问卷。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 22;13:991080. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.991080. eCollection 2022.
4
Mohs Micrographic Surgery.Mohs 显微外科手术。
Dermatol Clin. 2023 Jan;41(1):39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2022.07.006. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
5
Patient-Reported Nasal Function and Appearance After Interpolation Flap Repair Following Skin Cancer Resection: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.患者报告的皮肤癌切除后介入皮瓣修复后的鼻部功能和外观:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2023 Mar-Apr;25(2):113-118. doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2021.0271. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
6
Construct validity of the anglicised FACE-Q skin cancer module.英文皮肤癌量表(FACE-Q)汉化版的结构效度。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022 May;75(5):1644-1652. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.093. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
7
Cancer worry after facial nonmelanoma skin cancer resection and reconstruction: A 1-year prospective study.面部非黑色素瘤皮肤癌切除与重建术后的癌症担忧:一项为期1年的前瞻性研究。
Psychooncology. 2022 Feb;31(2):238-244. doi: 10.1002/pon.5810. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
8
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
9
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Lymphedema: A Systematic Review and COSMIN Analysis.患者报告结局测量在淋巴水肿中的应用:系统评价和 COMSIN 分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Mar;28(3):1656-1668. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09346-0. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
10
Development of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Mohs Reconstruction.患者报告的 Mohs 重建结局测量工具的开发。
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2020 Jul/Aug;22(4):274-280. doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0036. Epub 2020 Apr 21.

Mohs 重建术的患者报告结局指标:一项系统评价

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Mohs Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Garg Neha, Mandloi Shreya, Queenan Natalia, Trivedi Jay, McCann Adam, Xu Vivian, Amin Dev, Krein Howard, Heffelfinger Ryan

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Thomas Jefferson University Hospital Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sidney Kimmel Medical College Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.

出版信息

OTO Open. 2024 Dec 18;8(4):e70054. doi: 10.1002/oto2.70054. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.

DOI:10.1002/oto2.70054
PMID:39697816
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11653222/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) and subsequent reconstructive procedures for the treatment of facial nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) significantly impact quality of life (QoL). A validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for patients who undergo Mohs reconstruction is not yet established. This study aims to systematically assess the quality of existing PROMs to determine their effectiveness in capturing the challenges faced after Mohs reconstruction for facial NMSC.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review following established Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines was performed. Medline, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched using keywords relevant to MMS, NMSC, facial reconstruction, QoL, and PROMs.

REVIEW METHODS

Inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to compile eligible PROMs. Methodological quality and psychometric properties of PROMs were evaluated using COnsensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) criteria.

RESULTS

Of 2997 articles, 78 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 45 studies utilized a PROM as an outcome measure, and 33 reported PROM development or validation. COSMIN assessment demonstrated that the FACE-Q Skin Cancer Module and Facial Skin Cancer Index have the strongest validation. The Mohs Reconstruction Questionnaire-12 (MRQ-12) was the only PROM specific to this population of interest; however, it has not undergone psychometric property assessment.

CONCLUSION

Various PROMs have been utilized to assess QoL for patients undergoing facial reconstructive surgery after MMS. A clinically validated PROM specific to this patient population is required to gain deeper insight into these emotional impacts. Further validation and psychometric testing of the MRQ-12 may be beneficial.

摘要

目的

莫氏显微描记手术(MMS)及后续用于治疗面部非黑色素瘤皮肤癌(NMSC)的重建手术对生活质量(QoL)有显著影响。目前尚未建立针对接受莫氏重建手术患者的经过验证的患者报告结局指标(PROM)。本研究旨在系统评估现有PROM的质量,以确定其在捕捉面部NMSC莫氏重建术后所面临挑战方面的有效性。

数据来源

按照既定的系统评价和Meta分析优先报告项目指南进行系统评价。使用与MMS、NMSC、面部重建、QoL和PROM相关的关键词检索了Medline、PubMed、Scopus和Cochrane数据库。

评价方法

采用纳入和排除标准来汇总符合条件的PROM。使用基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)标准评估PROM的方法学质量和心理测量特性。

结果

在2997篇文章中,78篇符合纳入标准。其中,45项研究将PROM用作结局指标,33项报告了PROM的开发或验证情况。COSMIN评估表明,面部Q量表皮肤癌模块和面部皮肤癌指数的验证最为充分。莫氏重建问卷-12(MRQ-12)是唯一针对该目标人群的PROM;然而,它尚未进行心理测量特性评估。

结论

已使用各种PROM来评估MMS后接受面部重建手术患者的QoL。需要一个针对该患者群体的经过临床验证的PROM,以更深入地了解这些情感影响。对MRQ-12进行进一步验证和心理测量测试可能会有所帮助。