Yadav Ashok Kumar, Kaur Jaskiran, Kaur Prabhjot, Kamboj Kajal, Yasuda Yoshinari, Horio Masaru, Pal Arnab, Shafiq Nusrat, Sahni Nancy, Kohli Harbir Singh, Matsuo Seiichi, Kumar Vivek, Jha Vivekanand
Department of Experimental Medicine and Biotechnology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Department of Nephrology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Kidney Int Rep. 2024 Oct 10;9(12):3414-3426. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2024.09.020. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation equations have not been extensively validated in the Indian population. Preliminary data showed that the widely used creatinine-based Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) 2009 significantly overestimated GFR in Indians. Newer estimated GFR (eGFR) equations based on creatinine and cystatin C, omitting the race, have been recently proposed. We investigated the performance of race-free eGFR equations in the Indian population.
Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and potential kidney donors attending the outpatient clinic at the Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh, India, were screened for enrolment. GFR was measured by urinary clearance of inulin and plasma clearance of iohexol. Performance of eGFR equations (CKD-EPI, CKD-EPI CKD-EPI, CKD-EPI, CKD-EPI, 2020 and 2020, EKFC EKFC, and EKFC) were assessed against measured GFR (mGFR) using bias, precision, and accuracy (root mean square error [RMSE], mean absolute error [MAE] and P [% with eGFR within 30% of mGFR]).
A total of 412 subjects (55% with CKD), average age 47 ± 11 years with an equal distribution of males and females were enrolled. The mean mGFR in the study population was 54.2 ± 30.2 ml/min per 1.73 m. The average mGFR in the potential kidney donor's subgroup was 79.5 ± 23.2 ml/min per 1.73 m. Bias was highest for creatinine-based eGFR equations (CKD-EPI: -19.2 [-21.3 to -17.0] ml/min per 1.73 mand CKD-EPI: -17.0 [-19.1 to -15.0] ml/min per 1.73 m). Cystatin C- (either alone or with other markers) based equations were slightly better but still did not reach P ≥ 80%.
Race-neutral CKD-EPI equation did not significantly improve performance as compared to CKD-EPI equation. These observations emphasize the need for developing new eGFR equations for Indians and to standardize the mGFR for easy access to care providers for individualized patient care.
肾小球滤过率(GFR)估算方程在印度人群中尚未得到广泛验证。初步数据表明,广泛使用的基于肌酐的2009年慢性肾脏病流行病学协作组(CKD-EPI)方程显著高估了印度人的GFR。最近有人提出了基于肌酐和胱抑素C的新型估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)方程,省略了种族因素。我们研究了无种族因素的eGFR方程在印度人群中的性能。
对印度昌迪加尔医学教育与研究研究生院门诊的慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者和潜在肾脏供体进行筛查以纳入研究。通过菊粉的尿清除率和碘海醇的血浆清除率来测量GFR。使用偏差、精密度和准确性(均方根误差[RMSE]、平均绝对误差[MAE]以及eGFR在mGFR的30%范围内的P [%]),根据测量的GFR(mGFR)评估eGFR方程(CKD-EPI、CKD-EPI CKD-EPI、CKD-EPI、CKD-EPI、2020年和2020年、EKFC EKFC以及EKFC)的性能。
共纳入412名受试者(55%患有CKD),平均年龄47±11岁,男女分布均衡。研究人群的平均mGFR为每1.73平方米54.2±30.2毫升/分钟。潜在肾脏供体亚组的平均mGFR为每1.73平方米79.5±23.2毫升/分钟。基于肌酐的eGFR方程偏差最高(CKD-EPI:每1.73平方米-19.2 [-21.3至-17.0]毫升/分钟,CKD-EPI:每1.73平方米-17.0 [-19.1至-15.0]毫升/分钟)。基于胱抑素C(单独或与其他标志物联合)的方程稍好一些,但仍未达到P≥80%。
与CKD-EPI方程相比,无种族因素的CKD-EPI方程并未显著改善性能。这些观察结果强调了为印度人开发新的eGFR方程以及标准化mGFR以便医疗服务提供者更方便地进行个体化患者护理的必要性。