Coto H, Maldonado C, Palakurthy P, Flowers N C
Am J Cardiol. 1985 Feb 1;55(4):384-90. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90381-9.
Fifty normal male and female athletes, or athletically active subjects, were evaluated, and a search for low-amplitude late potentials in the terminal part of ventricular activation was performed. Recordings from 3 normal men met the definition of abnormal late potentials, and were indistinguishable by present analytic techniques from those encountered in patients who have ventricular tachycardia (VT) after myocardial infarction (MI). Of 24 patients studied, 11 had VT, but only 2 had had an MI, which occurred in the remote past. Another patient had 1 narrowed coronary artery on arteriography. Group differences could be demonstrated using amplitudes and durations of late potentials, but late potentials generally did not prove the impressive marker of the patient with VT, which other workers, as well as ourselves, have encountered in patients after MI. Late potentials were an impressive marker in a subset of the VT group in whom cardiomegaly developed. Thus, the absence of late potentials is an effective marker in the normal subject, but the presence of late potentials is not an effective marker in identifying the patient with non-MI-related, nonsustained VT before development of cardiomegaly.
对50名正常男女运动员或体育活跃者进行了评估,并对心室激动末期的低振幅晚电位进行了检测。3名正常男性的记录符合异常晚电位的定义,用目前的分析技术无法将其与心肌梗死(MI)后发生室性心动过速(VT)的患者的晚电位区分开来。在研究的24名患者中,11名有室性心动过速,但只有2名曾发生过心肌梗死,且发生在很久以前。另一名患者在血管造影检查中有1条冠状动脉狭窄。使用晚电位的振幅和持续时间可以显示组间差异,但晚电位一般并不能证明是室性心动过速患者的显著标志,其他研究人员以及我们自己在心肌梗死后的患者中也遇到过这种情况。晚电位在发生心脏扩大的室性心动过速亚组中是一个显著标志。因此,晚电位的缺失在正常受试者中是一个有效的标志,但在心脏扩大出现之前,晚电位的存在并不是识别非心肌梗死相关、非持续性室性心动过速患者的有效标志。