Lita Emmanuel P, Ochi Erneo B, Misinzo Gerald, van Heerden Henriette, Katani Robab, Godfroid Jacques, Mathew Coletha
Department of Veterinary Medicine and Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Science, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.
School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Juba, Juba, South Sudan.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Dec 19;18(12):e0012144. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012144. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Brucellosis poses serious public health implications and substantial economic losses in pastoral rural settings in South Sudan. In humans, brucellosis is almost always originating from animals. Current literature provides scant data regarding the seroprevalence of brucellosis in South Sudan. This cross-sectional study investigates the seroprevalence of brucellosis among the pastoral community and livestock and identifies risk factors for the disease from two Counties, Terekeka and Juba in Central Equatoria State (CES), South Sudan.
A total of 986 sera; from humans (n = 143), cattle (n = 478), sheep (n = 86), and goats (n = 279) were randomly collected from 17 cattle camps in CES. Sera for the humans, cattle and goats were screened for Brucella-specific antibodies using Rose Bengal plate test (RBPT) and further confirmed by competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (c-ELISA) in series due to the cost of testing. All the sera from sheep were tested in parallel using RBPT and c-ELISA as the sheep samples were few and were all tested negative on the RBPT. A camp was considered positive when at least one animal of either species tested positive on the c-ELISA. A structured questionnaire was used to collect information on potential individual and herd level risk factors. Univariate analysis using binary logistic regression with a confidence interval of 95% at a p-value of ≤ 0.05 was used to identify the association between the potential individual risk factors and Brucella seropositivity. The investigated risk factors for livestock included age, sex, species, prior abortion history, retained placenta, parity, and reproductive status. Variables found to have associations in univariate analysis (p = 0.25) with Brucella seropositivity were further included in multivariable logistic regression. The risk factors investigated for humans included, gender, age, educational level, occupation, marital status, drinking of raw milk, aiding female animals during delivery, eating undercooked meat and blowing of air into the cow's uterus through the vagina, a practice in South Sudan.
The study revealed seroprevalence of 21.7%, 11.8%, and 4.8% in cattle, goats, and humans, respectively. Our results indicated that all sheep serum samples were negative on both RBPT and c-ELISA. The seropositive in the 13 camps from Terekeka County was 100.0% (13/13) compared to 50.0% (2/4) seropositive from 4 camps in Juba County. All the variables investigated in the univariate analysis of risk factors in cattle were significantly associated with Brucella seropositivity: sex (OR:4.5, 95% CI: 2.2-8.9, p<0.001), age (OR:6.6, 95% CI: 2.3-19.1, p:<0.001), abortion history (OR:3.1, 95% CI: 1.8-5.2, p:<0.001), retained placenta (OR:2.5, 95% CI: 1.4-4.4, p = 0.001), parity (OR:2.3, 95% CI: 1.1-4.7, p = 0.020), However, in small ruminants, none of the potential risk factors were associated with Brucella seropositivity. In humans, blowing air through a cow's vagina (OR: 1.4, 95%CI: 0.782-2.434, p = 0.035) was the only variable found to be significantly associated with Brucella seropositivity in the univariate analysis. The forceful blowing of air into a cow's vagina to induce milk letdown is a common practice among the pastoral communities in South Sudan. The multivariable logistic regression model identified sex, age, and abortion history as statistically significant factors for Brucella seropositivity in cattle. The odds of seropositivity were nearly threefold (OR: 2.8; 95% CI: 1.3-5.8, p = 0.006) higher in cows compared to bulls (male cattle). Cattle over two years old had higher odds of Brucella seropositivity than young animals (OR: 3.5, 95% CI: 1.2-10.3-, p: 0.025). Cows with a history of abortion had higher odds of Brucella seropositivity (OR: 2.8, 95% CI: 1.6-4.7, p = 0.001).
This study reports the occurrence of brucellosis in goats and its absence in sheep in (CES), South Sudan. The present study also shows the occurrence of brucellosis in cattle, goats and people in the pastoral community and recommends for the implementation of the One Health approach and awareness campaigns for effective mitigation of this disease.
布鲁氏菌病在南苏丹的牧区对公共卫生构成严重影响,并造成重大经济损失。在人类中,布鲁氏菌病几乎总是源自动物。目前的文献提供了关于南苏丹布鲁氏菌病血清流行率的极少数据。这项横断面研究调查了赤道州中部(CES)的特雷克卡和朱巴两个县牧区社区和牲畜中布鲁氏菌病的血清流行率,并确定了该病的风险因素。
从CES的17个养牛场随机采集了986份血清样本;其中人类(n = 143)、牛(n = 478)、绵羊(n = 86)和山羊(n = 279)。由于检测成本,使用玫瑰红平板试验(RBPT)对人类、牛和山羊的血清进行布鲁氏菌特异性抗体筛查,并通过竞争酶联免疫吸附试验(c-ELISA)进行进一步确认。由于绵羊样本数量较少且在RBPT上均检测为阴性,所有绵羊血清样本均同时使用RBPT和c-ELISA进行检测。当至少有一种动物的c-ELISA检测呈阳性时,该营地被视为阳性。使用结构化问卷收集关于潜在个体和畜群水平风险因素的信息。使用二元逻辑回归进行单变量分析,置信区间为95%,p值≤0.05,以确定潜在个体风险因素与布鲁氏菌血清阳性之间的关联。调查的牲畜风险因素包括年龄、性别、物种、既往流产史、胎盘滞留、胎次和生殖状态。在单变量分析中发现与布鲁氏菌血清阳性有关联(p = 0.25)的变量进一步纳入多变量逻辑回归。调查的人类风险因素包括性别、年龄、教育程度、职业、婚姻状况、饮用生牛奶、在分娩时协助雌性动物、食用未煮熟的肉以及通过阴道向母牛子宫吹气(南苏丹的一种做法)。
研究显示,牛、山羊和人类的血清流行率分别为21.7%、11.8%和4.8%。我们的结果表明,所有绵羊血清样本在RBPT和c-ELISA上均为阴性。特雷克卡县13个营地的血清阳性率为100.0%(13/13),而朱巴县4个营地的血清阳性率为50.0%(2/4)。在牛的风险因素单变量分析中调查的所有变量均与布鲁氏菌血清阳性显著相关:性别(OR:4.5,95%CI:2.2 - 8.9,p<0.001)、年龄(OR:6.6,95%CI:2.3 - 19.1,p:<0.001)、流产史(OR:3.1,95%CI:1.8 - 5.2,p:<0.001)、胎盘滞留(OR:2.5,95%CI:1.4 - 4.4,p = 0.001)、胎次(OR:2.3,95%CI:1.1 - 4.7,p = 0.020)。然而,在小反刍动物中,没有一个潜在风险因素与布鲁氏菌血清阳性相关。在人类中,在单变量分析中发现通过母牛阴道吹气(OR:1.4,95%CI:0.782 -