• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈椎混合手术后Bryan和Mobi-C人工颈椎间盘的运动学状态:一项回顾性研究。

Kinematic status of Bryan and Mobi-C artificial cervical discs post cervical hybrid surgery: a retrospective study.

作者信息

Ma Yukun, Xiong Yang, Wang Ting, Yu Xing, Li Chuanhong, Meng Letian, Zhao He, Yang Yongdong, Zhao Dingyan, Wang Fengxian, Qu Yi

机构信息

Dongzhimen Hospital Afliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100700, China.

Department of Orthopedics, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No.5 Warehouse, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Dec 19;19(1):857. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05316-4.

DOI:10.1186/s13018-024-05316-4
PMID:39702339
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11657316/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the mid-term efficacy and imaging results of using the Mobi-C and Bryan implants after cervical hybrid surgery for 2-level cervical spondylolisthesis, and to observe their postoperative changes and differences in the flexion-extension center of rotation (FE-COR) for the anterior cervical disc replacement (ACDR) segment.

METHODS

Patients who underwent cervical hybrid surgery between June 2014 and June 2019 were included in this study. The mJOA, NDI, and VAS scores were used to assess clinical outcomes, and the FE-COR of the ACDR segment was measured. Pre-operative and 36-month radiographs were collected to compare the range of motion (ROM) in the total cervical spine, ACDR segmental ROM, and operated adjacent segmental ROM. Translation distances for the Mobi-C and Bryan devices were measured. The degree of disc degeneration in the adjacent segment and bony fusion of the ACDF segment were observed.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients were included (40 in the Mobi-C group and 41 in the Bryan group). All patients showed improvements in their postoperative mJOA, NDI, and VAS scores (P < 0.05). The C2-C7 ROM decreased in both groups (P < 0.05). There was no significant decrease in ACDR segmental ROM and upper or lower adjacent segmental ROM compared with preoperatively (P > 0.05). No significant differences were found between the two groups in the above ROM measurements (P > 0.05). For the Mobi-C group, the follow-up compared with pre-surgery showed statistical significance in both FE-COR-X (44.86 ± 7.70% vs. 57.13 ± 8.45%, P < 0.05) and FE-COR-Y (52.29 ± 12.71% vs. 34.47 ± 10.32%, P < 0.05). For the Bryan group, there were no significant differences at follow-up in FE-COR-X and FE-COR-Y compared with pre-surgery (P > 0.05). No significant difference in translation distance between the two groups was observed (P > 0.05). All ACDF segments were in a stable condition. Twenty-two out of 162 adjacent segments showed imaging ASD (9 cases in the Mobi-C group and 13 cases in the Bryan group). In the Mobi-C group, there were mild cases in 6 instances and moderate cases in 3 instances. In the Bryan group, there were mild cases in 8 instances and moderate cases in 5 instances.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical hybrid surgery using either the Mobi-C or Bryan artificial cervical discs can achieve satisfactory results. The FE-COR of the Mobi-C segment shifts forward and downward, while the FE-COR of the Bryan segment is relatively closer to the pre-operative condition. Changes in the FE-COR after hybrid surgery in both the Mobi-C and Bryan segments might not affect clinical outcomes.

摘要

目的

探讨在二级颈椎滑脱的颈椎混合手术后使用Mobi-C和Bryan人工椎间盘的中期疗效及影像学结果,并观察其术后变化以及颈椎前路椎间盘置换(ACDR)节段屈伸旋转中心(FE-COR)的差异。

方法

本研究纳入2014年6月至2019年6月期间接受颈椎混合手术的患者。采用改良日本骨科学会(mJOA)评分、颈部残疾指数(NDI)和视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估临床疗效,并测量ACDR节段的FE-COR。收集术前和术后36个月的X线片,比较颈椎总活动度(ROM)、ACDR节段ROM和手术相邻节段ROM。测量Mobi-C和Bryan装置的平移距离。观察相邻节段椎间盘退变程度和ACDF节段的骨融合情况。

结果

共纳入81例患者(Mobi-C组40例,Bryan组41例)。所有患者术后mJOA、NDI和VAS评分均有改善(P < 0.05)。两组患者C2-C7的ROM均降低(P < 0.05)。与术前相比,ACDR节段ROM以及上、下相邻节段ROM均无显著降低(P > 0.05)。两组在上述ROM测量方面无显著差异(P > 0.05)。Mobi-C组随访时与术前相比,FE-COR-X(44.86 ± 7.70% vs. 57.13 ± 8.45%,P < 0.05)和FE-COR-Y(52.29 ± 12.71% vs. 34.47 ± 10.32%,P < 0.05)均有统计学意义。Bryan组随访时FE-COR-X和FE-COR-Y与术前相比无显著差异(P > 0.05)。两组平移距离无显著差异(P > 0.05)。所有ACDF节段均处于稳定状态。162个相邻节段中有22个出现影像学相邻节段退变(ASD)(Mobi-C组9例,Bryan组13例)。Mobi-C组中,轻度6例,中度3例。Bryan组中,轻度8例,中度5例。

结论

使用Mobi-C或Bryan人工颈椎间盘进行颈椎混合手术均可取得满意效果。Mobi-C节段的FE-COR向前下方移位,而Bryan节段的FE-COR相对更接近术前状态。Mobi-C和Bryan节段混合手术后FE-COR的变化可能不影响临床疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b0b/11657316/9bd7c50d9d35/13018_2024_5316_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b0b/11657316/9bd7c50d9d35/13018_2024_5316_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b0b/11657316/9bd7c50d9d35/13018_2024_5316_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Kinematic status of Bryan and Mobi-C artificial cervical discs post cervical hybrid surgery: a retrospective study.颈椎混合手术后Bryan和Mobi-C人工颈椎间盘的运动学状态:一项回顾性研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Dec 19;19(1):857. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05316-4.
2
Changes in the centre of rotation and the anterior bone loss of the vertebral body in Mobi-C artificial disc replacement segments after cervical hybrid surgery: a retrospective study.颈椎杂交手术后 Mobi-C 人工椎间盘置换节段旋转中心和椎体前缘骨丢失的变化:一项回顾性研究。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Mar;33(3):1265-1274. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08047-y. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
3
Changes in the Centers of Rotation in Different Prosthetic Segments Following Continuous Two-Level Cervical Disc Replacement: A Retrospective Study.连续双节段颈椎间盘置换术后不同假体节段旋转中心的变化:一项回顾性研究
World Neurosurg. 2024 Dec;192:e416-e422. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.110. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
4
Mid-long-term follow-up of operated level kinematics after single-level artificial cervical disc replacement with Bryan disc.Bryan 人工颈椎间盘置换术后单节段颈椎运动节段的中远期随访研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Mar 9;17(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03051-2.
5
[Long-term outcomes of Bryan artificial cervical disc replacement for degenerative cervical spondylosis].[Bryan人工颈椎间盘置换治疗退行性颈椎病的长期疗效]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Dec 8;100(45):3602-3608. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20200711-02089.
6
Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases.单节段和双节段病例中,ACDF(前路颈椎间盘切除融合术)与Bryan人工椎间盘置换术后影像学变化的比较。
Eur Spine J. 2009 Feb;18(2):218-31. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0854-z. Epub 2009 Jan 6.
7
Cervical kinematics and radiological changes after Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion.与融合术相比,Discover人工椎间盘置换术后的颈椎运动学及影像学变化。
Spine J. 2014 Jun 1;14(6):867-77. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.432. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
8
A prospective, randomised, controlled multicentre study comparing cervical disc replacement with anterior cervical decompression and fusion.一项比较颈椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路减压融合术的前瞻性、随机、对照多中心研究。
Int Orthop. 2014 Dec;38(12):2533-41. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2497-5. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
9
Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.融合术和Bryan人工椎间盘置换术后的颈椎运动学
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Feb;21(1):19-22. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180500778.
10
[LOCATION CHANGE OF ROTATION CENTER AFTER SINGLE SEGMENTAL CERVICAL DISC REPLACEMENT WITH ProDisc-C].[使用ProDisc-C进行单节段颈椎间盘置换术后旋转中心的位置变化]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Jan;29(1):48-53.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes in the Centers of Rotation in Different Prosthetic Segments Following Continuous Two-Level Cervical Disc Replacement: A Retrospective Study.连续双节段颈椎间盘置换术后不同假体节段旋转中心的变化:一项回顾性研究
World Neurosurg. 2024 Dec;192:e416-e422. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.110. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
2
Changes in the centre of rotation and the anterior bone loss of the vertebral body in Mobi-C artificial disc replacement segments after cervical hybrid surgery: a retrospective study.颈椎杂交手术后 Mobi-C 人工椎间盘置换节段旋转中心和椎体前缘骨丢失的变化:一项回顾性研究。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Mar;33(3):1265-1274. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08047-y. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
3
Mid-long-term follow-up of operated level kinematics after single-level artificial cervical disc replacement with Bryan disc.
Bryan 人工颈椎间盘置换术后单节段颈椎运动节段的中远期随访研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Mar 9;17(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03051-2.
4
Ten-Year Outcomes of 1- and 2-Level Cervical Disc Arthroplasty From the Mobi-C Investigational Device Exemption Clinical Trial.Mobi-C 研究性设备豁免临床试验:1 至 2 节颈椎间盘置换术的 10 年结果。
Neurosurgery. 2021 Feb 16;88(3):497-505. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa459.
5
Patient Selection in Cervical Disc Arthroplasty.颈椎间盘置换术的患者选择
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Aug;14(s2):S29-S35. doi: 10.14444/7088.
6
Single-level Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty: evaluation of radiological and clinical outcomes after 18 years of follow-up.单节段 Bryan 颈椎间盘置换术:18 年随访的影像学和临床结果评估。
Eur Spine J. 2020 Nov;29(11):2823-2830. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06486-5. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
7
How Center of Rotation Changes and What Affects These After Cervical Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.颈椎置换术后旋转中心如何变化以及哪些因素会对其产生影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
World Neurosurg. 2020 Mar;135:e702-e709. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.12.111. Epub 2019 Dec 28.
8
Dynamic Fusion Process in the Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Self-Locking Stand-Alone Cages.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术中自锁式独立 Cage 的动态融合过程。
World Neurosurg. 2019 May;125:e678-e687. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.152. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
9
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus hybrid surgery in multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A meta-analysis.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术与混合手术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病的Meta分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Aug;97(34):e11973. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011973.
10
Risk factors for anterior bone loss in cervical disc arthroplasty.颈椎间盘置换术中前路骨质流失的危险因素。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Aug;29(2):123-129. doi: 10.3171/2018.1.SPINE171018. Epub 2018 May 25.