Suppr超能文献

血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂与血管紧张素受体阻滞剂及其联合应用对维持性透析患者死亡率影响的比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。

Comparison between the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers and their combination on mortality in maintenance dialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Elkoumi Omar, Elkoumi Ahmed, Elbairy Mariam Khaled, Irfan Hamza, Beddor Ahmad, Mahmoud Mostafa Adel T, Habib Omar K, Hendi Nada Ibrahim, Abdulgadir Ayah, Alawlaqi Bandar, Hamed Sarah, Ghanem Ahmed K

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Suez University, Suez, Egypt.

Medical Research Group of Egypt (MRGE), Negida Academy, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Jun;57(6):1895-1905. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-04322-z. Epub 2024 Dec 19.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patients undergoing maintenance dialysis have a higher mortality rate compared to the general population. It is known that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) have protective effects on the kidney; however, few studies have directly compared their impact on mortality in patients undergoing dialysis. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of ACEIs, ARBs, or their combination in reducing all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in maintenance dialysis patients.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Central, Web of Science (WOS), and Scopus databases from inception until August 23rd, 2024. We included all observational studies and clinical trials that assessed the effectiveness of ACEIs versus ARBs or their combination on mortality outcomes, in patients with CKD on maintenance dialysis. We used Review Manager 5.4 for all statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Five observational studies, including 126,612 patients, met the eligibility criteria and were included in the final analysis. Among all patients, no statistically significant difference was found between ACEIs and ARBs in reducing all-cause mortality (RR: 1.12, 95% CI [0.98, 1.27], P = 0.10) or cardiovascular mortality (RR: 1.10, 95% CI [0.92, 1.33], P = 0.30). In patients on hemodialysis, ARBs were associated with a statistically significant reduction in cardiovascular mortality (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest no differences between ACEIs and ARBs in reducing all-cause or cardiovascular mortality in maintenance dialysis patients. However, ARBs may reduce cardiovascular mortality more effectively in hemodialysis patients. Conducting randomized controlled clinical trials to validate our results is warranted.

摘要

引言

与普通人群相比,接受维持性透析的患者死亡率更高。众所周知,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)对肾脏具有保护作用;然而,很少有研究直接比较它们对透析患者死亡率的影响。本研究旨在评估ACEI、ARB或其联合使用在降低维持性透析患者全因死亡率和心血管死亡率方面的有效性。

方法

我们系统检索了从数据库建立至2024年8月23日的PubMed、Cochrane Central、科学引文索引(WOS)和Scopus数据库。我们纳入了所有评估ACEI与ARB或其联合使用对维持性透析的慢性肾脏病患者死亡率结局有效性的观察性研究和临床试验。我们使用Review Manager 5.4进行所有统计分析。

结果

五项观察性研究,共126,612例患者,符合纳入标准并纳入最终分析。在所有患者中,ACEI和ARB在降低全因死亡率(风险比:1.12,95%置信区间[0.98, 1.27],P = 0.10)或心血管死亡率(风险比:1.10,95%置信区间[0.92, 1.33],P = 0.30)方面未发现统计学上的显著差异。在血液透析患者中,ARB与心血管死亡率的显著降低相关(P < 0.0001)。

结论

我们的结果表明,在降低维持性透析患者的全因死亡率或心血管死亡率方面,ACEI和ARB之间没有差异。然而,ARB可能在血液透析患者中更有效地降低心血管死亡率。有必要进行随机对照临床试验来验证我们的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验